dedoporno: Hijack flipped exactly what he said he will along with the quotes. Trent kept saying Hijack is full of it and lying yet the flip was claimed upfront which rings a bell for me. And it's not only the result. Trent's alleged knowledge of Hijack's bad-guy-ness since N0 was shared at the end of the day for no practical reason and it wasn't in sync with his behavior towards Hijack during D1. I don't see how this wasn't obvious to a lot of people (we practically opened Today with questioning in this direction and we still didn't have the Sage read).
So, I don't know if you are missing something or my view of the general perspective of things is distorted and I expect more other see the same things I see and in the same way. Probably one of these. Or both.
I was the first to point out that his D1 play didn't reflect him having knowledge since N0, so I get all this. My "Am I missing something here?" refers to your [emphasis added] "It was just
a single fuzzy read at the time" (post #885), with "at the time" defined by you as [emphasis added] "
Last Dusk when we got Hijack's flip which differed from trent's report
and the following Night when targeting/planning and so on would have happened" (post #889), as your explanation for your post #881 counterargument to cristigale.
dedoporno: Hijack flipped exactly what he said he will along with the quotes. Trent kept saying Hijack is full of it and lying
yet the flip was claimed upfront which rings a bell for me. [...]
[emphasis added]
Just to make sure I understand you - what exactly are you saying with the part I highlighted in relation to trentonlf's "you're full of it and lying"?
On a side, but related, note - has the way things unfolded Today influenced your view on the likelihood of HijacK having been truthful about his role and alignment?
Question open to anyone that wants to chime in.
trentonlf: [...] 1. I expected JMich to ignore my claim because he is scum and a scum JMIch just wants the easy lynch and doesn't try to get answers like he does when he's town. So his ignoring my claim and what it entails was not surprising because I know he is scum and just wants to lynch me and move on. And if it's not clear it was JMich I investigated.[...]
You sure enjoy being ambiguous about your claim(s). You know JMich is scum because you investigated him. I was going to ask you how exactly your result was worded, but I see that cristigale beat me to it.
First you said [emphasis added] "scum
of some sort" for flubbucket, then "flip scum
or some sort", so what alignment do you file under scum? <damn it, RWarhall, we can't use quotation marks to actually quote what others say when referring to alignments, lest we create even more confusion; perhaps we should use the Polish style of them>
And given that the other two of your claimed results don't quite match the flips we got, what makes you so sure that he's scum-scum, and not "scum"?
Seeing that in his posts #833 and #837 JMich doubted your result on HijacK, I'm not sure why you'd expect him to ask any questions about your result on flubbucket, if he were town. I'm also not sure how telling the lack of questions from him is, given that he's hardly asked anyone anything. This is no defence of JMich, I'm just not sure if you're using these arguments in an attempt to make your latest clam about your N2 investigation, its result and your certainty it's accurate, believable. More so since your narrative changed pretty drastically. Why should we believe you're telling the truth this time?
trentonlf: [...] 2. As for flub, it is brought to light that he has been read as town and his response is to vote the person that is saying he is town. If flub was truly town he would not try and lynch a potential town investigative role, especially one that is clearing him. flub is scum of some sort and if he's not I will be shocked.
Going over flubbucket's posts, I don't read his vote as his response to you town-clearing him. I mean, given that every argument had already been made at the time he voted you, it does look (a bit) like piggybacking, but I don't see him voting you in relation to your result on him.
Having said that, in the same post you town-cleared him, you also revealed two other results that don't match the actual flips, which, as already pointed out, doesn't exactly mean that you cleared him as town. Additionally, in that same post you claim to have been told by the mod in your role PM that alignments in quotation marks "really mean anti town neutrals", though you don't get them in your results for some reason, which if true, as already pointed out, leaves a lot of room for a flubbucket "Town" flip, i.e. you have anything but cleared him as town.
Call me crazy, but if I were in his shoes, and you had claimed to have "cleared" me as town, I'd not put any stock in it. Again, this is no defence of flubbucket, I just don't think your argument holds up, and I wonder if you weren't hoping that he'd buy it, no questions asked, and have one less player willing to vote you Today.
Funny thing is that you're a pretty smart and skilled player, so I'm doubtful that you actually believe any of this yourself, and in turn quite puzzled if, why and how you expect any of us to believe it.
And you have yet to tell us how drealmr7's N1 action and flip fit in your knowledge about alignments in quotation marks, but I see that cristigale did.
trentonlf: [...] 2. From my perspective it is a very good reason to read him as scum,
his actions are not consistent with town flub. [...]
[emphasis added]
OK.
flubbucket: I have no idea if anything exists. However, a busdriver could switch player's places with each other.[...]
A Bus Diver, or similar, role is within the realm of possibilities, I guess, so if such a role is in play and responsible for the unreliable flips, that would mean that two players were switched with each other at Night, i.e. the alignment of at least one of them isn't their own, or at least not their actual one, yes?
How would a Bus Driver or similar role explain HijacK's flip since he was lynched and not NK-ed?
cristigale: [...] Trent's claim doesn't necessarily preclude a regular neutral from being anti-town, [...]
I've been waiting for trentonlf to make this sort of argument ever since I first asked him, as it's a quite valid one, but he chose to ignore my question. Which makes me wonder why he chose that path, and doesn't exactly help with believing him.
RWarehall: [...] Why does no one follow the motto of "Lynch Early; Lynch Often"?
To annoy the mod. Obviously.