trentonlf: Also, drealmer this comment "gamma are you ever going to be scum in a game with me again? (we've been in like 10 games together and he's been scum once?)" sure sounds like you are lamenting the fact that you are scum this game and gamma is not with you.
Vote drealmer
it really sounds like that? and why would I be openly sounding like that as scum? that's not at all what it is, I'm simply trying to get some response from gamma so I can start to read him
that is quite a stretch, and you even vote me off of it? highly suspect
Lifthrasil: ... since he again just takes something in a (
probably intentionally) wrong context...
I never try to take something intentionally wrong, all I'm doing is trying to understand (and scumhunt.) You trying to paint me as doing such (without even addressing it like "yo, d, it feels like you're intentionally taking this wrong, and the only way that makes sense is if you're scum.") So how much do you actually think I'm intentionally taking it wrong? Again it feels like you're just trying to paint me as scum.
Lifthrasil: ... is something that gives a player like drealmer somethin to latch on to. He doesn't care that after the experience of the last game my worry is a very valid one. He just cares to find anything he can attack. But I am somewhat surprised, that you tag along. I thought you were more perceptice that that and could recognize a player-worry as such.
where have I "latched on" to it? It struck me, I noted it, there was some apparent misunderstanding about it, I addressed it. You're the one who seems to be latching on if anyone is.
Lifthrasil: You might want to bold that.
you obviously want him to bold that - it kind of feels like you started the game set to paint me as scum and get me lynched
drealmer7: gamma are you ever going to be scum in a game with me again? (we've been in like 10 games together and he's been scum once?)
Sage103082: Do you know something we don't, as in if gamma is or is not scum this game? How would you know he is not scum this game making him scum twice during your games together? The only ones that know who is scum and who is not scum is scum.
You could say that I meant it as I know im not scum but he maybe and I know who I am so I can say I not scum so we cant be scum together this game but then you follow it up with the amount of games played together and mention he has only pulled scum in one mutual game. /eye brows raised here, big time.
TL:DR ;To me this says: Im scum and your not, are you ever going to be scum with me again. Then we have been in 10 game and gamma has only been scum once. And I know he cant be scum now because I know who scum is.
Uhhh, what? well first let me simply answer the straightforward question:
No, I don't know if gamma is or is not scum this game. That is why I ask him the question (to get his response, which is obviously going to be 'no', but it is HOW he says the no that I'm looking for.)
And then you go on to act as if I am saying I do know if he is scum or not? it really seems like you're doing logical cartwheels to try and make something I asked suspicious when all it is is a simple question to gamma to get a response from him - also, gamma and I have never been scum with gamma. I look forward to the day though!
if it were as you say, why would I say any of it like that if I were scum? are you really suggesting I'm sitting here going "hey all I'm scum and gamma is not! DAMNIT!" - hence my "uhhh, what?" - I just don't quite get what this post of yours is all about other than potentially trying to make me look like scum. pings for you
Sage103082: To me I can not see how being ok with throwing around votes on someone who did not have the chance to post at all is not a good thing. And could possibly lead to a wagon and quick lynch. And that would be very bad for us. We could lose an important role.
This (and the rest that has be excised) sounds very LAMISTy - 'oh no I'm concerned about a fast wagon/quick lynch - BAAAAD' and you go on to explain the obviousnesses of possibilities ad-nauseum - when it really wasn't THAT big of a threat to happen, at all.
bler144: Two ways you can tell I'm not mafia:
1) My posts have typos- when I'm scum I obsess over every post for content/tone, and here while it's not stream of consciousness, I'm not really investing in it. I said my food thing was intentional when it was unintentional, and one of the sentences in my last post clearly has the wrong words in the wrong places ("talk them everyone it ") that I would have caught it I were actually proof-reading at all.
2) Life is literally a shitshow right now. If I had rolled scum I'd either be lurking or I'd have come out the door self-voting so my teammates could at least not go down trying to defend my complete not trying. I literally could not handle any more stress than I already have going on.
1.) of course with your self-awareness of this this point becomes moot as you could be not correcting your typos / poring over your wordchoice/phrasings because 'ohhh, this is a scumtell of mine let me try and turn it into a towntell as scum!"
2.) *hug* *passes bong* - hope things chillax for you, dude!
trentonlf: Is no one else seeing that comment drealmer made as odd?
"gamma are you ever going to be scum in a game with me again? (we've been in like 10 games together and he's been scum once?)" actually, now that you've re-iterated this combined with sage's similar issue I think maybe it's at least partially a misunderstanding? I think you're thinking I'm saying "scum with me" instead of "game with me" - the object phrase is crucial here and the 'again' is reiterative of the point, since we've never been scum together - I've amended my above response to sage accordingly to try and clarify the issue if that is indeed the issue
bler144: On the 2nd point, I agree it was curiously fervent for that point in the game. Like Lift distilled to his Lift-iest essence (which seems to me to be a pattern so far). Also agree with cristi (perhaps putting words in her mouth) that you were curiously fervent about Lift's curiously ferventinity.
I love this
bler for retirement community president - do you need a campaign manager?
drealmer posts a relevant youtube link OMG bler144: But it is a good argument for not putting wagons off until deadline (assuming there are such), so there's time to assess whatever is claimed and who's making it.
always the goal, imo
we wouldn't want someone to claim 30 minutes before deadline, have everyone hop off because of the claim, giving no time for the true CC to be heard, and it to go to no-lynch...
HijacK: I think drealmer, Hyper, and lift should take it easier with accusations. It looks like they are already raising the roof and such combative posts will only lead to them thinking of each other as scum purely based on the fact of conflict, not necessarily related to other behaviors, actions, and statements.
the absence of alcohol has given you a clarity of mind! I like it! and I totally agree in theory, however, I still feel like lift is being overly eager/aggressive in trying to get others to view me as scum, and I can't help but SR him for that given the level it has gotten to
bler144: not exactly sure what is going on there, but feel fairly confident saying sage + trent not w/w
wow that is interested because right as I read the series of 124 -
128 the thought jumped in to my head "huh, is this possibly 2 scumbuds talking to each other in the open?"
omg, bler, I'm so glad you're playing you keep making me laugh
bler144: For the record, I'm not interested in either flub/yogs at the moment
not even as showering companions?
*checks the state of the game before posting*
*posts this much for now because DAMN I'm behind* - this won't last through the game (I hope) I actually intend to get all caught up in the next day and be LIVE with you all because that is always so much better