I thought I smelt a whiff top shelf whiskey when I was putting the wash in.

I just went through the balancing an I need at least 9 players for the game I have in mind.

Count me in

Isn't he more of a bourbon guy?

I went back and forth between the two and figured whiskey is stronger in taste and so I went with that one lol. Im more a vodka girl so I have no clue on a good whiskey or bourbon.

you've got to give it some time

I agree give it a little bit more time

I cannot guarantee much attention from the 22nd on (except every third day), but if a 2 out of 3 day floater doesn't bother you, I could fill a spot.

Yay! I can't say whether the players will kill you for floating, but I'm okay with a limited absence period if it is pre-announced.

It is I, returned from my long slumber!

(Like, I would like to be an observer for now.)

Long time! Welcome back :)

@Lift, I might be able to join but am still waiting to confirm my schedule for the next 2 weeks.

Yay! Sure you don't want to jump in at the deep end and play right away?

OK. Let's wait for that confirmation.

No offense meant against RW, but I'm kind of worried about him not being able to post even every other day. Seems like it starts town off with a handicap, regardless of his alignment. It just feels like starting the game with a lurker lynch in the works.

Does a lurking, yet providing strong and useful insight player has to be lynched for lurking? It is up to RW to provide valuable content of course and I do understand that any townie would be tempted to lynch a lurker just because (s)he (in general) is less readable and giving more doubt than any other player... But then, evaluating the actual content maybe is more important?

In other words, I ask if "quality against quantity" helps in case of a lurker or not, and from experience - is it better to just lynch lurkers?