It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
EBWOP

Oh, about the name thing. That was why I was asking flubbucket that silly math questioning involving his name.

Doing it for the name 'Miller' yields an integer:

Number value of M =13; number of letters in name = 6

13*13 + 11 = 180

180/(6*6) = 5

This also works for 'Melvin' (and many other names), which was JMich's name, so it wasn't a hard confirmation, merely an indication.
avatar
flubbucket: Has the deadline been moved to yesterday yet??
I am a benevolent mod, and your request is granted!

Er...in part, anyway.


Derp - reverse order
You have a deadline. It has slipped forward to [edit] 1:23 pm PST today, 5 hours and 10 minutes from now.
Post edited March 31, 2016 by bler144
avatar
RWarehall: The problem I have is Bookwyrm saw violence and all that in the file of CSPVG yet he flipped Town. Now you are claiming when CSPVG saw someone harmless, he was correct, but when he was told you were Town he was wrong...
Town was his conclusion based on me being harmless described by the phrase I stated before. This was what he said in his post " All of this lead me to conclude that Hunter is Town. "

avatar
flubbucket: I see no reason for CSPVG to fabricate evidence.

Also he didn't state emphatically you were town. He concluded, which to me seems like a reasonable deduction instead of undisputed investigation results.
I didn't say that he fabricated evidence, and I noted that town was his conclusion already here I still have no idea as to why he got the poison statement in my file.
avatar
Krypsyn: ................

My night PM, in brief and paraphrased. I had trouble sleeping, I heard a BANG (as noted by others), a while later I heard shuffling feet outside my room, and I didn't perceive anyone visiting my room during the Night.
Shuffling.....I wonder why??
avatar
flubbucket: Also he didn't state emphatically you were town. He concluded, which to me seems like a reasonable deduction instead of undisputed investigation results.
Look at the wording. It's unclear whether CSPVG was paraphrasing his PM and Bler told him specifically that this leads to you concluding Hunter to be town or whether CSPVG concluded that himself. I can read his statement both ways.
avatar
flubbucket: Shuffling.....I wonder why??
I am guessing that was an indication of the Night Action phase. People were moving past my door, in the hallway.
avatar
RWarehall: The problem I have is Bookwyrm saw violence and all that in the file of CSPVG yet he flipped Town. Now you are claiming when CSPVG saw someone harmless, he was correct, but when he was told you were Town he was wrong...
Not quite. I saw words that are associated with violence in CSPVG's file, like guns, explosions, and decapitation. However, I wasn't told that he committed violence. A cop might have worked cases that involved those things, or maybe they were in the play CSPVG was working on.

Likewise, in JMich's file, the biggest evidence was a picture of him grinning while holding a bloody knife, and his apparently obsession with death, etc. Doesn't actually mean he was a killer.

If Hunter is indeed neutral, then I'm more likely to guess that CSPVG was naive and I'm paranoid. Where does that leave town, considering their potential game breaker? I don't know. Maybe it doesn't exist.
avatar
flubbucket: Shuffling.....I wonder why??
avatar
Krypsyn: I am guessing that was an indication of the Night Action phase. People were moving past my door, in the hallway.
Or....
avatar
adaliabooks: Or....
Man, now you are making me want those pork chops I set aside to marinate last night! It is far too early, however; they are for dinner. You are so mean. :(
avatar
RWarehall: Look at the wording. It's unclear whether CSPVG was paraphrasing his PM and Bler told him specifically that this leads to you concluding Hunter to be town or whether CSPVG concluded that himself. I can read his statement both ways.
Based on my reads, CSPVG-player provided his investigative result, not interpreted it. CSPVG-Danny looked at the file and came to the conclusion that Hunter was town, and mechanically CSPVG-Player has the investigative result that "Hunter = Town".
avatar
Bookwyrm627: If Hunter is indeed neutral, then I'm more likely to guess that CSPVG was naive and I'm paranoid. Where does that leave town, considering their potential game breaker? I don't know. Maybe it doesn't exist.
If that turns out to be the case, then you and CSPVG were useless from the start. In fact, more damaging to town than being Vanilla as we were virtually guaranteed to mislynch as a result.
avatar
Hunter65536: I didn't say that he fabricated evidence, and I noted that town was his conclusion already here I still have no idea as to why he got the poison statement in my file.
I'm not accusing you of fabrication.

However, why would CSPVG speak specifically of poisoning ability??

If the moderator told him his results were town, isn't it a safe assumption he would have stated such??

Instead he says "All of this lead me to conclude that Hunter is Town."

I'm not trying to be pedantic, it just doesn't align.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: If Hunter is indeed neutral, then I'm more likely to guess that CSPVG was naive and I'm paranoid. Where does that leave town, considering their potential game breaker? I don't know. Maybe it doesn't exist.
avatar
RWarehall: If that turns out to be the case, then you and CSPVG were useless from the start. In fact, more damaging to town than being Vanilla as we were virtually guaranteed to mislynch as a result.
*shrug* I don't know what to tell you. We'll be able to see the full setup after the game, including what Bler had in mind for order of play. One of my biggest curiosity points is how random the file distribution was, and why CSPVG and I started with different numbers of files.

Anyway. I hate to inflict a loss on someone unnecessarily, but I'm willing to victimize Hunter for the clarity and decent risk of him being scum. We don't even need to wait for me to investigate him. If he's neutral, then lynching him on Day 3 is a waste of a lynch, and we don't have time to wait and see if he is alive Day 4 if he is scum.

Additionally, it looks like we might have a Krypsyn versus Trent lynch choice.
avatar
Hunter65536: I didn't say that he fabricated evidence, and I noted that town was his conclusion already here I still have no idea as to why he got the poison statement in my file.
avatar
flubbucket: I'm not accusing you of fabrication.

However, why would CSPVG speak specifically of poisoning ability??

If the moderator told him his results were town, isn't it a safe assumption he would have stated such??

Instead he says "All of this lead me to conclude that Hunter is Town."

I'm not trying to be pedantic, it just doesn't align.
CSPVG said himself, he thought it was in reference to his excessive flatulence. In essence, the only way Hunter could kill someone was poisoning him with his farts.

As I've said all game, I think you are going too far with the poison. I see no deaths tied to poison just as I see none tied to fire. I think both aspect are meant to mislead us.

The part I don't get about Trenton is if we have insane cops and he's a psychiatrist, what kind of psychiatrist can only cure Serial Killers?
avatar
flubbucket: However, why would CSPVG speak specifically of poisoning ability??

If the moderator told him his results were town, isn't it a safe assumption he would have stated such??

Instead he says "All of this lead me to conclude that Hunter is Town."

I'm not trying to be pedantic, it just doesn't align.
CSPVG said that Hunter couldn't murder someone except via poison. Doesn't mean Hunter does use poison, just means that it doesn't preclude Hunter from using poison. Then there was the fart joke bit; it isn't entirely clear whether CSPVG or Danny is making the fart joke connection.

My Danny draws conclusions, so I expect that his Danny did too, and CSPVG may have just been speaking for CSPVG-Danny when revealing his read.

avatar
RWarehall: As I've said all game, I think you are going too far with the poison. I see no deaths tied to poison just as I see none tied to fire. I think both aspect are meant to mislead us.
We've only had one night, and the poison might not be immediate. Of course, if we've got a disappearing act type kill, an evisceration type kill, and a poison type kill, town never really had a chance.