I put this on the back burning when Bookwyrm reported his investigation, now there is more to add to it.
cristigale: My preference is to select someone I find scummy over someone I (simply) believe is not contributing as much as others.
dedoporno: Fair enough. Is there someone fitting that description?
Had to do a little bit of digging. I think I found what was bothering me about the flubb/hunter exchange I mentioned
here My overall impression of the exchange was flubb seemed to be twisting what Hunter said. It reminds me of what he did in the Gameshow Showdown game (CSPVG’s open setup where flubb, JMich, and I were scum). Flubb decided to go after Bookwyrm. He went after Bookwrym (and then HijacK) harder in that game than what we’ve seen here, but perhaps went too hard. It played a factor in his lynch.
(The above is what I had at when Bookwyrm reported his investigation.)
Flubb’s recent post about Bookwyrm is similar. I agree with his final point about the lack of information that Bookwyrm is willing to share. That is cause for concern. The other points deal with Bookwyrm when Bookwyrm was attempting to push CSPVG’s wagon apart from a report. Whether Bookwyrm is town or scum, claiming that Bookwyrm didn't post about CSPVG with enough conviction seems thin. Comments like this one:
Bookwyrm627: ...........<snip>...........
Yes, voting you was necessary. Alright, I'll ask: is there a reason we shouldn't lynch you?
flubbucket: If CSPVG is scum, there is no reason.
Seems like an twist on the context of Bookwyrm’s question. It keeps reminding me of when flubb was scum in the past. I’m also suspicious that the comment about Bookwyrm potentially framing me was an attempt to swing me to vote for Bookwyrm.
Vote flubbucket I think Bookwyrm is telling the truth but am also concerned he might be a bastard role. The problem is that if we go with Bookwyrm and he is insane/paranoid, we’ve shot ourselves in the foot. For the first time, I’m considering no lynch. Whether or not I’m willing to vote CSPVG may depend on Hunter’s answer to my question.