Bookwyrm627: Different game, different alignment (for me, anyway), same reason. I wanted to look for CSPVG's buddies before they knew my hook was in the water.
Why did you claim now? You asked CSPVG about his ID yet you didn't wait for him to respond. What was the point of asking if you were going to claim anyway?
By the way, @CSPVG, you were asked about your ID yet you didn't respond.
RWarehall: So CSPVG's claim seems to be he's staff and has access to our files...
This is not true.
He said he is in the hospital after an accident. He said he got hold of some files to look at, not that he is staff. He may still be scum but you are basing your accusation on false arguments (may be a result of reading it wrong, of course).
cristigale: He seems like the least likely person I would expect you to choose.
Really? I have to agree with Wyrm that he would have probably been among my top picks for a N0. When you have nothing a lurker is probably your best choice.
drealmer7: Dedo and trent: I yearn for the sound of your thoughts! Please share some!
To be honest, I'm concerned. The only thing that makes me want to believe Wyrm is that it seems way too risky to make such a bold move on D1. What makes it scary is that now I know there was a N0 which makes it possible for scum to night-chat and exchange information prior to the game. If they have something that makes such a play less risky it suddenly becomes a better and potentially very lucrative play.
I really don't know what I think. I'm afraid my judgement is clouded by past experience. I know I'm not voting for Wyrm since there wasn't a counter claim. I'm thinking about whether or not I want to vote for CSPVG.