I dearly hope the formatting in this post is not going to get messed up terribly.
Dessimu: Why? I find your suspicion to be suspicious. Doing reading on you now.
Huh? Okay...
Dessimu: There are so many things about Leonard that, if given a thought of him being scum, look indeed very strange.
As if this wouldn't be true of
anybody playing?
Leonard03: So you think there are game mechanics based on what people's names are? That seems highly improbable.
Dessimu: Keeps making his point that names are not important, sharing them gives nothing good. And then in the same post:
Leonard03: I would be in favour of everybody sharing their names and dislikes.
Dessimu: Explaining later:
Leonard03: Well considering how much of a hullabaloo has been made over it, may as well have everyone share their info.
Dessimu: I guess the probably suspicious thing here is how quickly Leo changed his opinion when just recently making a stance of against importance of our names.
Nope. Never changed my stance, I still think names are unimportant. However, since there were people who were putting more stock in them it seemed wise to have everybody share.
Dessimu: I feel like I would be grasping at straws here, but vote on flub was not RVS, yet not based on reasons, only the deadline. I did not count it, but I think we still had some hours till the deadline (look how eagerly we discussed things when Lift's deadline was coming up). If Leo was town, I find it suspicious to condemn drealmer because his PM talk was
strange (not
wrong) and because weekend was coming up. And I don't like how Leo says "IMO he wasn't a bad lynch either" about drealmer. Because it was a bad lynch. Bad for town. And a good lynch for scum only.
My vote on flub was based on him acting different from normal. Why can that not be a reason? You what happened just a few games ago when nearing the end of the game flub started to contribute more? Him and his scum buddies won.
I don't see what you're getting at between "strange" and "wrong". drealmer was clouding things by making an unnecessary (sorry drealmer!) ruckus over the names. When I said it wasn't a bad lynch, I was referring to my feelings at the time. Obviously when we lynch town it is a bad lynch.
dedoporno: If any of this is part of an elaborate ruse I'm fine with losing to such a masterful play.
Well, I'm not.
I think it's 2.B
Dessimu: Leo later answered to trentonlf "Just to be clear - I am not scum". But maybe this answer was because this innocent "Yes" attracted unwanted attention? Add to that:
...
Proud of being slippery. Why slippery?
Continual insistence of being town is blah and boring, so I don't do it.
Dessimu: Sounds like a challenge.
*gansta voice* You gonna make a deal outa' it boy? :P
Dessimu: Why interested in CSPVG?
Cause I had just re-read him and noticed he had done the same thing as you were accusing HSL of. So why should I
not mention it?
Dessimu: And Leo seems to "accidentally not pay attention to things"
Nope. I miss things all by my self, no need for contrived "accidents".
Dessimu: To sum up... Through the game, Leonard voted:
> flubbucket, because:
- deadline was approaching
- flub talks too much this game
> drealmer (hammered), because:
- deadline was approaching (even though there were about 12 hours till deadline)
- to avoid no-lynch
- because of
strange PM talk
> Lifthrasil, because:
- of re-discovered thing about third reason in Lifthrasil's vote being wrong
- deadline approaching
A little bit of journalistic license, but ok.
Dessimu: And Leo made wrong and strange points, that:
- drealmer was a
not bad lynch
- we can lynch anyone as long as it is not a no-lynch
1) Answered this one.
2) I am strongly against no-lynch, but there are exceptions.
Dessimu: What are your thoughts?
Though this theory concludes that I am not scum (which is correct)... not in a million years.
Hunter65536: I say we go with Leonard.
Vote Leonard03 Not hard to convince you huh?
flubbucket: The
total lack of counter claim isn't enough for you??
No.
In fact,
Vote: flubbucket Where did this come from?