That... may be true. But let's face it, it's not like my posts are going to be that deep anyway. I just drop by the forums a couple times a day, see what's cooking and that's that. I realized on my first game that the whole second guessing and deep thinking wasn't my thing; specially on the first day when there's not that much to step on. So, now when I play, I just fool around and only get somewhat serious when I feel things are serious. It's fun for me. I understand some people may have a problem with that, and even though last time I brought it up it wasn't taken as a bad thing, it's not like I can't understand why you would vote for me.

I mean, it's Friday night and I'm in Belgium *notices forgetting to switch locale and hurriedly fixes it*. I do want a beer. Is town going to give me a beer? However, I don't get to choose my role. Otherwise, I would have killed a cop or two by now.

Okay, I think the server gnomes ate my reply, so let me try again. Hopefully it won't suddenly become a double post.

That... might be true. But let's be frank, it's not like me posting any more frequently will make my posts any deeper. I just drop by once or twice a day, see what's cooking and react to that. I understand you might have a problem with that, and I won't hold it against you if you find it a reason to lynch me, but this is how the game is fun for me therefore I play this way. I'll only get somewhat serious once I feel the situation get pretty serious.

Plus, it's Friday night and I'm in Belgium *notices forgetting to update the profile location and does it now in a hurry*. I do want a beer. I just don't want to die for one. My loyalties lie with alcohol, unfortunately, I don't get to choose my role. Otherwise, I would have killed a cop or two already.

Maybe? Let me put it this way: if I've said something that could be taken in two ways, and one is very very very bad; I meant the other.

I am guessing your posts per page is "x", where x(mod 20) = 0.

Heh.

Yup, that was indeed the case. After the second post I switched to 50 and there was my post. Both of them.

Now, feel free to have fun and spot the differences of what I said on my first impulsive reply and the second, more thought out one. I'm sure you'll find tiny traces of my psyche that you can use to discover my true game identity, which will inevitably lead to my death.

Unless I planned it all, and those traces are misleading on purpose. MWAHAHAHAHAHAAH!!! Oh who am I kidding, I'm not smart enough for that.

EBWOP

Actually, a better, and broader, way to put it would be:

Your post count is 'x', where 421(mod x) = 1

No Sherl Shitlock!!

Yes. I meant 'x' to be the same as in the first example .. bleh.

Unvote yogsloth
Vote P1na

Yup, if you all wanted to jump on board and lynch him now I'd be fine with that. I think balance of probability suggests he's town, but his flip either way gives us more info then a No Lynch would.
It's the waiting around till the deadline that annoys me. And the fact that no one else shares my enthusiasm for just lynching and getting on with it (bar Ix) yet they will still just lynch anyone when the time comes because there is a deadline.

Emphasis added.

I'm not usually one to push on things like this, but it's day 1 and their's bugger all else going on.

The SK, as in; one you know exists? That seems an overly strong assumption given absolutely no evidence to suggest there is a SK.

Hell, I don't see any better place to park a vote, so why not.

Vote drealmer7

Ok, I will give Krypsyn that, although that's not always been the case when I've been playing with him...

But look at it this way, there should only be a few "random" votes on a wagon as any vote after that would presumably not be random (unless we all randomly voted the same player at once) and those could be analysed. So at worse you only lose a few votes worth of analysis.
I know I'm never likely to convince people on this one, but I don't think we're playing the RVS part of the game right and that's why day 1 sucks so much.

Just like that other time, eh? When you claimed to have placed a random vote? Which you then took back because of popular demand? And not because you were scum trying to throw us off by voting and unvoting your scum-buddy? Eh?


So, if you notice things, it's OK to dig into them, else not. Will keep this in mind. ;-)



I don't see how I implied anything, pretty sure I didn't imagine those exchanges of yours I referenced in my previous post.


Well, it's not obvious to me, since I'm questioning you about it. And no, I don't see what the problem is with his post #27, if that's the post you're referring to.



It's the same vision he had last game, and probably the same he'll have next game. That's not to say that I like it, didn't like it last game (and not just because I wasn't town back then), don't like it this time, won't like it in the future. But I don't see it bothering others.


Perhaps I'm the only one that didn't have a dollhouse.

But since you got it, do you think his vote was justified at that point?



While sitting in the shadows and doing nth so that you yourself don't make any slips, mistakes, acting strange, etc.?



You forgot to put you own, and a couple of others', name in that list.

I don't recall you going after any of the above for the reason you say though.

If that is indeed the reason you're voting yogsloth, why him and not one of the others that are playing this game?

And since when anything Krypsyn does must make him town? I thought it was the opposite.



Mind sharing why you're voting him?



I was about to agree with Krypsyn that P1na reminds me of CSPVG's play in terms of the excessive lurking, when a refresh revealed a number of posts by him. Not sure what to make of them, a few (too many) questionable things dressed up as light-hearted fun. I've not played with him before, so no idea if he indeed enjoys joking around, but it's a bit too easy and too convenient to say eyebrow-raising things, then chalk it up to joking to get a free pass.

Thing is... you may not believe it, but that vote was genuinely random. It just happened to land on CSPVG, but while I was tempted to role again I thought screw it and went ahead anyway.

Yes! Now you've got it! ;)

Although considering you're imploring us to consider scum to be intelligent, suggesting that anyone might have missed yog's claim seems to be crediting the players with a low level of intelligence or interest in the game...
(And before you say anything, I know you haven't actually said that, but suggesting that anyone may not have picked up on yogs claim in the way I hadn't picked up on the details you had in that other game amounts to the same thing as far as I can see)

Post 335. You wrote: "Well, at least you don't deny that you have no intention to enlighten the rest of us that don't get your reasons."

Good question.

Me too.

What can I say? I haven't been spending as much time on the forum lately, but tonight I didn't quite like the game I was intending to play so I'm hanging around longer, therefore posting more. It seems everyone is basing their play on how previous games went, so let me give you (and anyone else who cares) a fast rundown:

1st game: I was some kind of town bodyguard, slipped some joke about wanting to "protect everyone", was killed by mafia on first night. Murdered by JMich, IIRC.

2nd game: I was a thief, town or neutral. Was fun stealing people's stuff, and I actually survived long enough to discuss the mechanics and exchange the info I discovered by sneaking into others' rooms. Most fun game so far, I got nightkilled by mafia eventually but was fun while it lasted. I don't remember how the game ended after I was dead.

3rd game: I believe I was taking over for someone else, some kind of aliens with power to read the dead thread? I was traveling in Japan at the time and it was a slow game, so I lost interest and the game didn't end well.

4th game: I replaced someone else, got nightkilled before I could even post.

Did I miss any?

Here, I fixed that for you :) I kid though, I have no actual read on Krypsyn just yet.


The wording seems off to me to be that. Even though lynching is technically killing it's supposed to be less... hm... nefarious. As for why I think we should keep this discussion for Tomorrow or whenever we have more information, the reason is pretty simple. We don't have any useful official information to work with. This means that all discussion will be pure speculation and assumptions and these are dangerous. They are also a distraction. There is also potential for accidental secret information disclosure while the discussion goes which is also not something we want happening (unless scum do it, but statistically the chance of that should be around 4 times smaller and we may not have the necessary knowledge to actually catch that).




I disagree on that. Yes, when he posts it's more about some non-game related stuff, but he participated a lot more in the last couple of days than I expected from him.


Nothing of serious proportions. Small bits here and there, but not enough to go on it right away. I'm mostly giving Ix and adalia the bad eye, I don't like the way Leonard is waiting for stuff to happen, cristi/p1na and somewhat HijacK are too non-present for my liking and of course flub/yog/reactions deserves a lot of attention.


Come on, man! That's even worse than before.

Wtf?!

@trent, p1na kicked it up a few notches. Like a whole bunch of notches.

@p1na, this is where you start to get more involved and explain yourself.


I guess it's a matter of perspective, really. I do believe it was justified in the eyes of Krypsyn. I won't go so far as voting for just this but that doesn't mean others won't. I don't see how that makes bler so scummy, but I can see how someone will go after people for lesser things they don't like just because there isn't anything else better to work with.