Bler, I don't think any of the scum teams went into last Night with all their members intact. If one of them did, then the rest of us can't afford to lynch you or they win.
At this point, I'm fairly sure that all of the people who were supposed to be my allies are dead. So I'm going to say that if there is a scum team of two out there, I have a message for you two: You can't afford to kill Bler. Sometimes Necessity dictates your alliances.
If you are a scum team of 3, then you still shouldn't be trying to kill Bler, you should be looking for the other team of 3. Without him and me, you stand the risk of sudden loss.
I think Bler did indeed give me a key. Sadly, I don't like the door it opened.
-----
drealmer7: I really wasn't proposing the idea of a neutral godfather, or didn't mean to. I simply mis-interpreted the wiki.
This post: I don't think I've seen a more frantic attempt at back pedaling since the first time I upgraded to a bike where the only brakes were on the handle bars.
-----
HijacK: Your "you could have told us" piece is just a fool's argument. And I don't even believe you trust it yourself.
I agree with Bler. It could have easily been arranged to prevent Trent from hammering himself. Heck, shopping around to set up a hammer prevention would have been more informative even if Trent did still manage to hammer himself.
-----
HijacK: If you agreed with the analysis I provided and were willing to vote trent, IN WHAT WORLD WOULD A TOWNIE BE AFRAID TO HAMMER SCUM?
How about a world where he knows there are other scum out there, and he's trying to pin them down?
-----
bler144: , even though there's at least the possibility the teams are mirrored and there's more than one Trent. Seeing his flip would've been very nice for gauging what we face, wouldn't it?
HijacK: Possibility is there. His flip already guaranteed such a role exists. Who else has it, if anyone? Well, data is insufficient.
*face palm* Just think what we could have done WITH his flip! Would have been nice if we could have, I dunno, confirmed whether Trent was able to dink around with things besides the lynch flip.
-----
Ixamyakxim: In two words:
Hijack's back.
Didn't get this when I first read it (just scanning posts based on who quoted me). Having caught up to this point, now I do. +1 to you, sir!
-----
HijacK: Krypsyn and yogy seemed to correlate in votes quite a bit. I'm having trouble grasping this argument. I don't know what makes you think yogy wasn't in the same team as krypsyn. They were pushing for similar people as well.
...really Hijack? You really and truly can't see why Kryp and Yog weren't on the same team?
-----
drealmer7: "oh wait, maybe if we do lynch him another team will suddenly control the vote and so we shouldn't lynch him"
This is EXACTLY what people should be considering. You've already looked at the idea of the game starting with three scum teams of four people each. Think about what happens if one of those teams hasn't lost someone, and someone NOT on that team is lynched.
-----
Here's a thought. Why don't we try voting on the various proposals from the OP?
Vote End Prohibition.