drealmer7: You don't think my point to flub is valid? You don't think I'm right to poke him a bit about his thoughts on yogs?
Bookwyrm627: If you hadn't already said you were already working on a post about Yog, then I wouldn't have questioned you asking Flub about Yog. Within the context of "I'm working on a post about player X", asking someone else "So, what do you think about player X" raises the question of whether the questioner is hoping to do some "What he said".
Understandable, but not what I was doing. My point with flub was more to point out that he doesn't really share any of his thoughts, at all, ever, (it seems to me), and I was frustrated with that, especially considering he seems to have enough thoughts on yogs to be voting him. He must have thoughts around all of that, I figure, I'm curious what they are, they seem pretty solid and damning of yogs, you know?
(I wasn't asking you for what
information you had, flub, I was asking you to share SOME thoughts of SOME sort, hell, about anything would be nice.)
I just like to have open discussion about all theories, mine and others. Not so I can jump on and say "oh yeah that!", but, as conversation/discussion about all possibilities and thoughts had so we can actually WORK TOGETHER to try and figure out wtf is up (with yogs and everything else going on in-game.)
drealmer7: Seriously though, I'm not having fun right now, I'm fucking pissy and not thinking clearly and am going to step away. Judge me for it if you like, I don't fucking care atm.
Bookwyrm627: If you need a break, then take a break. Generally speaking, you don't need our permission unless you plan to be gone long enough that the "Not Posting" guidelines become an issue.
Okay, well, I'll reiterate that I found it rather not-cool and possibly scummy to me, and definitely doesn't sit well with me regardless, for you to see me say "I'm not having fun" and it seemed your response was basically "too bad, play anyway." Off of it now, and sorry for my shitty attitude.
drealmer7: The difference between me and hijack though is that he got a PM about being jailed (so he says), I did not.
HijacK: ...How did you know you were jailed then?....
I am very very inclined to vote now. That sounds like a massive slip.
I didn't say I was jailed, I wasn't jailed (unless I received no notification, I suppose is an option, so more accurately I should say "I have no awareness of being jailed.") I think you're misunderstanding me. Or, more likely, fabricating things to make look how you want them to look so you can validate voting me because of my read on you, OR because you simply don't like how I play the game.
The point you're missing is that I don't believe you were jailed. I believe you didn't die because you're scum and the prodding was of no concern to you (as I pointed out previously.) Being jailed is an easy way to explain away why you were safe. I'm inclined to believe that it is a lie more than the alternative, at least. (especially considering your re-iteration of the statement "pls. I was jailed..." to Ix when he shares some theory. Yes, we know you said you were jailed, why do you feel the need to repeat yourself? To me that is more something a liar does.) If leonard doesn't flip town jailer, you're my next highest suspect, simple as that.
Right now it is looking to me like bookwyrm is very afraid of what yogs is going to tell us (he seemed so earlier in the day as well, is how it is reading to me) and wants to prevent it at all cost. (oh hey, and yogs calls him on that I see...reading on!...)
So, I got done reading. Sheesh! *lets the brain wrack a few*