It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Community
General discussionForum Mafia #31: Crisis at Space Station Epsilon(2361 posts)(2361 posts)
(2361 posts)
Pages:
1
25
50
63
64
65
66
67
100
125
150
158
This is my favourite topic
Posted October 14, 2015
Unvote drealmer7.

Vote agentcarr16.
Posted October 14, 2015
Well, I don't see it either. So without putting being Station Crew as addendum, I didn't claim right?
whatever all I wanted to say there, was that I'm right choice for repairing generators and that worked fine enough.
I won't be next one pressured into fullclaiming right now, scum has enough info as it is, I think.
But if that's what krypsyn is trying here, have at it. I'm not able to defend very well in the next 10 hours though, since it's back to work for me now. (again, as it will be same time tomorrow)

But I hope I'll have time to answer any questions that may arise when coming home before falling into bed sleeping (like I did today).
Posted October 14, 2015
avatar
yogsloth: I'm not hanging a man for parentheses.
...
Posted October 14, 2015
avatar
Krypsyn: Heh.
avatar
Krypsyn: Heh.
Precisely the sort of non-helpful response I would have figured to come from you. I do actually want to know why you find it to be false though, so any answer you are willing to provide at any point would be appreciated, it could prove helpful. If you don't want to be helpful in trying to discern who the intruders are, well, yeah, no surprise I suppose.
Posted October 14, 2015
avatar
yogsloth: I'm not hanging a man for parentheses.
I thought it was hanged on a comma...
Posted October 14, 2015
avatar
trentonlf: I totally missed that. Please no one else out PM info out there!!!

Vote mchack
Maybe you can clarify for me? Are you voting for him simply because he shared PM information from the A.I., or are you voting for him because, with that information you are able to discern he is an intruder. If you are able to discern that he is an intruder with that information, could you please tell us why so the rest of us can make a more informed decision? Or what?
Posted October 14, 2015
avatar
mchack: So without putting being Station Crew as addendum, I didn't claim right?
Heh.

avatar
drealmer7: I do actually want to know why you find it to be false though,
I bet.
Posted October 14, 2015
avatar
trentonlf: I totally missed that. Please no one else out PM info out there!!!

Vote mchack
avatar
drealmer7: Maybe you can clarify for me? Are you voting for him simply because he shared PM information from the A.I., or are you voting for him because, with that information you are able to discern he is an intruder. If you are able to discern that he is an intruder with that information, could you please tell us why so the rest of us can make a more informed decision? Or what?
There's more to it than the list Krypsyn linked. And I am not going to make this a game about PMs
Posted October 14, 2015
avatar
Krypsyn: Yep.

Unlike mchack, you got your claim correct. (post 588, iirc)

Unvote: agentcarr16
Vote: mchack
Oh, indeed.

Vote mchack.
Posted October 14, 2015
avatar
trentonlf: There's more to it than the list Krypsyn linked.
Okay then if there is more to it, please share it.

Vitek seems to have picked up on it too. There should be no harm in sharing whatever factors there are that have made you go to vote this way if he is in fact an intruder and you did in fact pick up on discrepancies or off-behavior from him.

A bunch of "ah, yes!" and "oh!! yeah!" from varying people highly suspicious in my view. "oh, indeed!" WHAT exactly? Any of you voting mchack, please, enlighten the rest of us.
Posted October 14, 2015
avatar
trentonlf: And I am not going to make this a game about PMs
To be fair, that's exactly what it is right now.
Posted October 14, 2015
avatar
CarrionCrow: If you're only going to post part of your initial game PM while projecting the image of full disclosure to save yourself, you aren't exactly committing to the approach.
It's against the rules to directly quote my PM. I told you that which I thought was necessary, and I'll be quite honest in saying that I'm not paraphrasing my entire PM.

avatar
RWarehall: And again, for any cops out there, please don't waste it on confirming a townie. Don't listen to Agent. It helps us far more to discover an actual scum. And a less beneficial side-effect to a "miss" is you always confirm a townie...

Agent's advice is bad advice...find the scum...save the cheerleader!
Sorry, I was intending to point out that my claim is confirmable. If I had claimed Vanilla, then it would be a real waste of the cop's time to investigate me. As I have a role, it's not quite as much of a waste.

avatar
RWarehall: Of course I have no idea why Agent decided it was necessary to reveal his role...
Frankly, that part was completely unnecessary...
I suppose it wasn't necessary, but I think it strengthened the effect of the entire post, which was what I was aiming for.

avatar
yogsloth: <snip snap>
...
My vote stays for now, although "Tracker" would be an awfully ballsy role for Scum to claim,
...
<crackle pop>
So besides my meta, why are you voting for me?

avatar
Krypsyn: <snip snapples>
I'm with trentonlf on this, but thatt's enough for me to vote mchack for now.

avatar
drealmer7: What makes mchack's claim unquestionably false?
avatar
Krypsyn: Heh.

avatar
CarrionCrow: Nothing that I can see.
avatar
Krypsyn: Heh.
I'm hoping that they simply don't see the importance of it...

avatar
drealmer7: A bunch of "ah, yes!" and "oh!! yeah!" from varying people highly suspicious in my view. "oh, indeed!" WHAT exactly? Any of you voting mchack, please, enlighten the rest of us.
@ everyone else - Is it likely that this'll be useful later in the game? If not, we might as well share...


@ Q.U.A.D. - Votecount please
Posted October 14, 2015
avatar
trentonlf: And I am not going to make this a game about PMs
avatar
Vitek: To be fair, that's exactly what it is right now.
Sadly I know :-(

@drealmer7, my suspicions of him started early on in this post http://www.gog.com/forum/general/forum_mafia_31_crisis_at_space_station_epsilon/post187. Was a very scummy play on his part.
Posted October 14, 2015
avatar
drealmer7: Any of you voting mchack, please, enlighten the rest of us.
I find it much more enlightening to see who gets it (or, at least, claims to get it) without help. I do have a reason, and, although it isn't certain, it is about as good as any Day 1 reason can get. Especially when added to my other concerns about mchack.

avatar
Vitek: To be fair, that's exactly what it is right now.
Which makes me feel a little dirty. However, at least it is about a claim, and the veracity thereof.
Posted October 14, 2015
avatar
agentcarr16: It's against the rules to directly quote my PM. I told you that which I thought was necessary, and I'll be quite honest in saying that I'm not paraphrasing my entire PM.
Then why do it at all? You're basing your defense on incomplete information, then expecting people playing a game of lies and manipulation to believe you.
Pages:
1
25
50
63
64
65
66
67
100
125
150
158
This is my favourite topic
Community
General discussionForum Mafia #31: Crisis at Space Station Epsilon(2361 posts)(2361 posts)
(2361 posts)