Death is a possible outcome on a failed crisis. Thus why I wouldn't want to see it happen.

word...

finally caught up (ah that night shift's killing me just woke up :/)

Yay, for successfully resolving this crisis, good going Team Teslascarab! :D

Nay, for the fullclaim :/ not sure where you were at, agent, but I don't think it was more than L-3 or L-4.

So what now? I wonder what would happen if we never ever got a deadline ;) We might still be at it in a month...

So let's see, it's poorly reasoned that I took issue with you "wanting to see what the consequences were" even though possible crew death was specifically mentioned...

Apparently its also poorly reasoned to believe that town should censor itself on certain topics that only really help scum which strangely you seem to disagree with. Right? Maybe we can all just start discussing who we think is giving out the orders and help give scum the leg up on their night kill... (This is being sarcastic...for the love of God, please don't!)

And in terms of not reading the thread...as I claim...
You went off on how the station crisis might be resolved trying to figure out which stats might resolve what, when I'm pretty sure everyone else caught immediately it would be STR for the Teslacrabs and FIN for the repairs.

Then you somehow accuse me of "breadcrumbing" my stats after had volunteered and was already picked to the crisis by the "Appointinator".

I also do not like the way you have claimed at L-3 after threatening to claim yesterday...

Yet, somehow, you are claiming how poor and misguided and prone to a witch-hunt everyone else is...

So, for now, I'm not removing my vote. I don't like how eager you have seemed to role claim...

Now, on a less serious note...
Since Q.U.A.D. can now apparently sense the rough location of intruders...
Why didn't he scan the away team so we'd know how many scum were contained within?
Heck, we could make this really easy, people could move off one-by-one and be scanned...
Game over, we could move on! Town wins!

How about it Q.U.A.D.?

I was, and still am, at L-3.

Am I the only one who noticed that Crew Death is only a possibility if "multiply failures occur in one event."?
I want to know what happens if we have one failure. Or if there's a tie with the target.

I won't. Don't worry. I agree that there are certain topics that we need to keep quiet about, like the dispatcher. But the stats were and are relatively public knowledge, so I still don't see any harm in discussing them.

Wrong. Not everyone caught that immediately. Drealmer7 didn't catch it until I pointed it out to him.
And considering that I corrected myself within 10 posts, you might assume that I posted before reading Post #2 carefully. Which shouldn't be a problem since I correct myself with careful reading.

If you specifically say that you shouldn't be picked for a FIN task, then it's fairly obvious that you have low FIN, so we can assume that you have a high STR or INT. That's breadcrumbing, if I'm not mistaken.
And obviously the dispatched took it as a breadcrumb as well.
So why is it a problem that I call it a breadcrumb?

I have my reasons. Namely, I don't want to be lynched.

Did you read the warning? I'm being sarcastic.

Get used to it. I may play like this more often, as I'm thoroughly enjoying myself!

I figure that on Day 1, Town is always witch-hunting. They don't really have any clues, it's pretty close to blind lynching.
And meta is always a bad reason to lynch someone, in my opinion.

No, you were at L-4, as one person had already unvoted you. You are now at L-5, since after checking on a couple things, I have to unvote you as well...

Unvote AgentCarr

And for the record, breadcrumbing is the act of leaving a not so obvious trail.
Volunteering and saying pretty obviously not to pick me for the FIN task, as far from a breadcrumb...

As to what might happen with just a single failure, I'm pretty sure most of us are willing to wait to find out when the game is over...

Yes. I'm sorry about that. I had forgotten that Trent unvoted me.

We talk about obvious breadcrumbs and not-so-obvious breadcrumbs, don't we?

And thanks for the unvote of confidence.

I don't like this one bit. It stinks of a false claim and in a very dangerous role to have being false. Hell, you even ask our cop to come out and clear you on Day Two.

Unfortunately about the only thing I do like about it seems compelling enough for now though.

unvote agentcarr

Vote HSL

And again, for any cops out there, please don't waste it on confirming a townie. Don't listen to Agent. It helps us far more to discover an actual scum. And a less beneficial side-effect to a "miss" is you always confirm a townie...

Agent's advice is bad advice...find the scum...save the cheerleader!

Assuming they aren't scum.

Well I have a bunch of thoughts about the progressions that have gone on here, but, unless anyone specifically wants to hear them or to hear what I have to say about something specific, I'll just observe at this point and see how it unfolds. Unless of course I feel like I really have something strong to contribute.

crewdroog, I feel I addressed your issue of my "saying a lot but not saying much", if I have not, I can try and reiterate it for you more clearly. Do you have issue with my vote for Vitek and do you see it as an intruder-like move still and would you like me to explain it to you more? I'm totally willing, but don't want to strain everyone's eyes unnecessarily if you are good at this point.

Of course I have no idea why Agent decided it was necessary to reveal his role...
Frankly, that part was completely unnecessary...

How are you able to speak with such certainty that Agent isn't scum?