It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
trentonlf: *wonders what in the hell is a shitpickle*
avatar
CarrionCrow: Presumably, a pickle that's been up someone's ass for whatever reason. Beyond that, not sure.
I think that is for aging purposes. For those lacking canning or jarring technology.
Hey folks - looks like a particularly busy work day for me, so might not be as active as usual.

_____

So I'm feeling a little bit like bait being trawled across the pond to see which fish give a bite. Normally, I'm OK with that... because I'm usually the one who puts that plan into place! Nevertheless, we seem to actually have a bite:

avatar
mchack: I just don't see yogs as very scummy yet... don't really have an opinion on him at all as of now.
avatar
mchack: if we're talking the deadline is neigh and to avoid a no-lynch then definitly yogsloth since he has the biggest wagon, hence most chance of avoiding a no-lynch. Wagon analysis helped us alot last game on day 2 I think, so I would like there to be a wagon to analyse :) (and a flip to make sense of it, obviously)
Uh huh.
Finger of Suspicion Yogsloth

For trying to make sense during early RVS...

I wanted to vote for you early, but too many are on the bandwagon...
And obviously voting the mod is not a thing. Didn't think so, but pardon me for being a little antsy after that Bagatha Crusty crap.

Definitely floundering a bit here, but I do think (like usual) figuring out the lay of the land is key here. I think I'm suffering from a little pressure to do something zany, because I've boxed myself in that way. I haven't got much, as believe it or not I don't want to just start blurting out PM information every single time. Man, I wish Bookblerbookswyrm was here.

Oh, hey:


avatar
agentcarr16: *quietly unvotes Leonard03, [votes HypersomniacLive*
wtf was that, by the way? I'm looking for a secret code in the bolding and not finding it. Is this a legit vote?
avatar
mchack: On Krypsyn:

I really don't know what to make of him this time around.
Bummer.

avatar
mchack: -For one he doesn't post youtube links anymore (which has been commented on as him maybe not being scum this time around).
Irrelevant.

avatar
mchack: -Secondly he is throwing out weird messages: #35 he states with a certainty that yogsloth is scum, which I guess, he could only have if he was scum himself, but then it wouldn't make sense to do it. Any elaboration on why you're so sure yogs is scum this time around, would be nice.
Redundant.

avatar
mchack: -Thirdly he probably lied twice #42 and #76. But in #123 he says something that could be interpreted as never meaning it in the first place. On the other hand it could be all true of course, I only know my own stats and that's three without any snooker skills mentioned...
Heh.

avatar
mchack: All in all, I think he's making too easy a target of himself, which I don't think he'd do as scum, so he might be town (or neutral) after all. Time will tell...
WIFOM.
avatar
yogsloth: Oh, hey:

avatar
agentcarr16: *quietly unvotes Leonard03, votes HypersomniacLive*
avatar
yogsloth: wtf was that, by the way? I'm looking for a secret code in the bolding and not finding it. Is this a legit vote?
*nods silently*
avatar
RWarehall: Finger of Suspicion Yogsloth

For trying to make sense during early RVS...

I wanted to vote for you early, but too many are on the bandwagon...
I don't know, I actually agree with yogs on mchack' post, the tone is LAMIST and fells off to me. If somehow yog's wagon continues and he is lynched mchack has created a reason to be on it even if he doesn't think yogs is scum, trying to create himself a free pass to vote yogs. Still not a fan of yogs talking PM info, but now that it's a moot point I will

Unvote yogsloth
avatar
trentonlf: I don't know, I actually agree with yogs on mchack' post, the tone is LAMIST and fells off to me. If somehow yog's wagon continues and he is lynched mchack has created a reason to be on it even if he doesn't think yogs is scum, trying to create himself a free pass to vote yogs. Still not a fan of yogs talking PM info, but now that it's a moot point I will

Unvote yogsloth
Not saying i disagree, I mostly just wanted to use the word "finger".
Yep, RWare still scum.
avatar
trentonlf: I don't know, I actually agree with yogs on mchack' post, the tone is LAMIST and fells off to me. If somehow yog's wagon continues and he is lynched mchack has created a reason to be on it even if he doesn't think yogs is scum, trying to create himself a free pass to vote yogs. Still not a fan of yogs talking PM info, but now that it's a moot point I will

Unvote yogsloth
avatar
RWarehall: Not saying i disagree, I mostly just wanted to use the word "finger".
LOL
It seems several of you are totally content, even desiring, to lynch someone without discussion, provocation, or any apparent reasons. For me, this draws suspicion directly to you and I will detail my reasons and progressions of accusation (current level of suspcion level underlined):

- trentonlf (who is actually the first to accuse yogsloth, very arbitrarily it would seem, as, I believe it is possible yogsloth was just trying to share some valid and pertinent information.) A bit of a joker, and that is all good, I don't think it is out of not-caring for the situation at all. He has since removed his vote towards yogsloth and so, with that action, to me, he is not suspicious.)

- Ixamyakxim is the 2nd to throw out a reasonless vote, and in that regard it seems they are trying to cast suspicion away from themselves. They then come back onto the wagon of yogsloth, and so, it adds to my thoughts that a bunch of intruders are trying to remove yogsloth for some reason very suspicious.

- Krypsyn then comes in with a vote for yogsloth as well, in conjunction with trentonlf's vote (intruders working together?) and the fact that he makes claims of loyalty right away followed by incendiary statements and harder accusations of yogsloth makes him extremely suspicious.

- flubbucket is making reasonless accusations, again, probably just out of the initial fear of the situation, if they have any more information as to why they voted the way they did, I'd like to know why. As of now, minor suspicion.

- vitek also jumps on the yogsloth wagon, seeming to want to cause a fast-lynching, which is very disconcerting and, seems to be causing some issues otherwise among us, again, another seeming extremely suspicious, to me.

avatar
Vitek: If you had to vote right now, whom would you choose?
No one ever HAS to vote for a lynching. I think that is forgotten for some reason. We can all vote no lynch and if that becomes the majority, then no lynching happens for the day, I believe. Let's wait until we have more facts of the situation, which none of us really seem to have any of, and try to resolve everything peacefully, with no deaths.

For those that haven't voted and would like to maintain some civility here, keep an eye out on those who would be fast to kill someone, for they are more likely the intruders, IMO. In the meantime, I recommend everyone who doesn't wish to be seen as over-reactive, attacking, or devious, to vote no lynch. If you feel the need to vote for someone and get rid of a possible intruder, let's try to work together and remove one of them rather than let the intruders work together and remove a true crew member. After my recommendation of voting no-lynch, I could be okay with and recommend a vote for vitek or krypsyn, or Ixamyakxim making a case for themselves being an intruder as well.

Thoughts?
avatar
drealmer7: - vitek also jumps on the yogsloth wagon, seeming to want to cause a fast-lynching, which is very disconcerting and, seems to be causing some issues otherwise among us, again, another seeming extremely suspicious, to me.
He did? I thought Vitek was already on the wagon, at least according to the vote count one post above Vitek's.
avatar
drealmer7: I think that is forgotten for some reason. We can all vote no lynch and if that becomes the majority, then no lynching happens for the day, I believe.
Vote drealmer
Vote drealmer
Vote drealmer
Vote drealmer
Vote drealmer
Vote drealmer
Vote drealmer
Vote drealmer
Vote drealmer


We are not doing no-lynch.
avatar
Vitek: We are not doing no-lynch.
Speak for yourself only, please.
avatar
drealmer7: Thoughts?
There's two sides to every coin, but you are only looking at one side.

Your suspicions are all based on the fact that yogs is Town. If you look at the situation that yogs is scum does it change how you view your suspects? Also, as JMich pointed out Vitek had voted yogs early, the "lets see if we can get a fast lynch" was not a true vote. You should go back and read post 169....

I will also say this, If you somehow have knowledge that yogs is not scum that would lead most to believe you are scum because that's who would know that at this point. Right now no one knows who is or is not scum except for scum themselves. Unless you had some N0 action that you can share.