It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
trentonlf: @Bookwyrm my question is a moot point now. I was asking because JMich was hinting that he role blocked drealmer but drealmer was alluding that he was not so I was wondering if drealmer had no night action if he would have known about being role blocked. But drealmer has since said he was blocked so it does not matter.
Fair enough, though I think the question might also be answered from two sources now.

avatar
JMich: I shudder to think what kind of crisis would require my specialization. So no, I am willing to bet there won't be one for mine.
...That troll crap cleaner joke was a lot closer to the mark than I realized, wasn't it?
avatar
Bookwyrm627: ROFL!
Must be really slippery if you started rolling as well.

Also, are people mental? How does it make sense, on night 1 after a no lynch to be considered scummy if you don't interfere with potential investigative roles? Wut?
avatar
Bookwyrm627: ...That troll crap cleaner joke was a lot closer to the mark than I realized, wasn't it?
You do see that I only mentioned the troll part of your quote and not the cleaner one, right?
here have an:

UNOFFICIAL Day 2 Votecount:
L-5 adaliabooks (krypsyn[#1392],trentonlf[#1345],ixamyakxim[#1361])
L-6 hijack (rwarehall[#1393], flubbucket[#1488])
L-7 rwarehall (hijack[#1330])
L-7 ixamyakxim (yogsloth[#1375])
L-7 jmich (drealmer7[#1493])

avatar
Ixamyakxim: I think they're making another play for a long drawn out day of attrition, hoping for disengagement and another no lynch.
avatar
Krypsyn: If that happens... I think I will have exceeded my shits given for this game entirely. It would be just nonsensical, horrible play all around, and just not worth my time. Day 1 is a toss up, I can somewhat accept No Lynch derpiness then, but not on later Days.
Well I for one am not sold on any wagon yet, and I don't simply want to restart the one of yesterday, which most seem to be doing.

As for adaliabooks' claim, I think it should be confirmable somehow, either because maybe abilities should normally flip aswell (seems odd we still don't know exactly what a maintenance droid does. Was it a jailer? Was it a vanilla? maybe abilities flip only when the coroner does his thing?) or because maybe we'll see dark flips in the future? So I wouldn't just lynch him right of the bat. But if nothing comes up to support him, I guess we can do without a coroner...

As for rwarehalls captain claim, this should be the easiest to confirm. And I think that's the main reason we should wait until a crisis is over before lynching somebody. If he isn't confirmed, it's an easy scum lynch and if he is, we do finally have our first truly confirmed town player and should look at his lists anew. Well I know, he doesn't know who's scum just because he's confirmed, but at least it won't be lists made by scum to misdirect us...

As for our claimed roleblocker team, refreshed there and ookay yet another claim. now this is getting pretty massclaimy, I thought we don't like those?
anyway, seems one roleblocker is confirmed, as for hijack, maybe you better use your powers tonight, if you survive the day, so that we might believe you tomorrow....
Btw, what happens when two roleblockers try and block each other?

As for agent ... hmm, maybe one more chance to report something? but that's it then... scum shouldn't be able to block the same person twice in a row, right?

As for who to lynch then? I say, there's still a crisis ahead and maybe this time scum will be stupid enough to try and sabotage and then we can put someone out of that team in the hot seat... if not, I'll definetly not stand for another no-lynch. You'll see me jumping the highest wagon for sure, unless I'm almost certain we'll hit town with it. Then I'll be on the second highest ;)
avatar
mchack: ... I don't simply want to restart the one of yesterday, which most seem to be doing.
It is what happens when there is no Day 1 lynch, as other mentioned Yesterday. Without a lynch, there is less to go on for Day 2, so, often, Day 1 just repeats itself. Town made their beds; now they can deal with it (WIFOM is fun).
avatar
Krypsyn: It is what happens when there is no Day 1 lynch, as other mentioned Yesterday. Without a lynch, there is less to go on for Day 2, so, often, Day 1 just repeats itself. Town made their beds; now they can deal with it (WIFOM is fun).
And our tracker and our "sumthin" cop both got roleblocked during the night, so no info. What are the odds? Let's go buy a lotto ticket.

So we're back in Day 1 again, only with less pep. Less vim. Less porno. And I can already see I'm going to be the lone fool, howling in the wind again.

MAN it would be great if we could start that crisis event. Since we need four days to resolve the damn thing.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: If the dispatcher dies, does someone else become the dispatcher? If there is no dispatcher, how do assignments work during the crisis events? Do we auto-fail all checks for each event, losing extra town members each day for massive failure?

I suspect the scum team would likely be willing to sacrifice one member if it meant extra kill(s) each Day for the rest of the game. Might be worth taking the chance even if they aren't sure that is what would happen. It's not like we have a reputation for lynching before a deadline is declared.

Also, Adalia: is your role active or passive?
No idea. I would assume there must be some back up. The crisis events can't just end if the dispatcher dies, but whether that means a new dispatcher is chosen (some kind of station hierarchy of which we are all a part? or randomly?) or whether the teams get chosen randomly, or something else I have no idea.

I can't see scum being willing to sacrifice a member on the off chance it would make the crisis events more beneficial to them...

I checked with Quad to make sure after daybreak because I assumed active, but wondered if maybe my presence alive meant we got flips (which would mean my claim was a very bad idea) but Quad said it is active and I have to choose to use it. I asked if I could use it on dedo, but he said I would have to wait till tonight to try...
avatar
Bookwyrm627: ...That troll crap cleaner joke was a lot closer to the mark than I realized, wasn't it?
avatar
JMich: You do see that I only mentioned the troll part of your quote and not the cleaner one, right?
Didn't notice at first, but yes, I see it now.

Also, the longer I look at that gif, the funnier it gets. Breathing is optional, right?
avatar
Bookwyrm627: ...That troll crap cleaner joke was a lot closer to the mark than I realized, wasn't it?
avatar
JMich: You do see that I only mentioned the troll part of your quote and not the cleaner one, right?
So.... let me get this straight.
You're a role blocking janitor droid?

And people doubt my claim...
avatar
yogsloth: MAN it would be great if we could start that crisis event. Since we need four days to resolve the damn thing.
Agreed. Would rather it show up now so it can be out of the way.
I feel I should mention I won't be on at all tomorrow (or not until late if I am) as I'm working all day (yay!)

I don't see it being a problem... I can't imagine we'll be any closer to a lynch in 24 hours...
avatar
Ixamyakxim: Also, scum please nightkill agentcarr.
Just bumping this little gem that absolutely everyone has ignored.

You disappointed, ix? Agent only got roleblocked by some anonymous party. Maybe Scum wasn't taking your advice? Huh.
avatar
drealmer7: I'm not so sure I slipped, and if I did, it was you that pushed me and made me slip.
avatar
JMich: Nope. I didn't push you. I just polished the floor.
Polisehed the floor AT me specifically somehow? I don't quite follow, which is why I'm asking for you to elaborate (and of course you're not.) But, yes, at least I understand your position that much, you say you only polished the floor and not push me, I heard you, no need to repeat yourself.

And...
How convenient, now, after I have given you the detail+flavor of what happened to me, that you can come up with something that isn't contradictory and still makes you look okay. Sure, what you say could be true, I'd have believed it more if you had been more direct or forthcoming at any point.
avatar
drealmer7: What flavor did you receive from your action result?
avatar
JMich: Exceptional cleaning inside and outside your door, you slipped and knocked yourself out as you were entering your room.
Yeah, we get your position. Stop trying to roleplay, you're not good at it. No wonder you don't like it.
avatar
drealmer7: What exactly was your action?
avatar
JMich: Roleblocking you.
Are you evading the question or did you not understand it. I asked you for exact, specific information, not some implied or general role (of "roleblocker"), but what you actually did.

Meh, I tire of trying to communicate effectively with you. You are difficult, vague, elusive, and again, non-contributory becoming more and more a waste of my time it seems. You're mostly just seeming scummy.

avatar
yogsloth: I’d really like to know how your title fits together with whatever deeply mysterious “totally not roleblocker” roleblocker role you have.
avatar
JMich: My role is practically a roleblocker one, but it's not called roleblocker. That doesn't mean that the roleblock is my only ability, even if it is the only night action I have.
See, you said the roleblocker thing before already. No need to repeat yourself. Either elaborate/be more helpful or shhush.
avatar
drealmer7: Why did you feel the need to perform it on me when I already claimed Healthy and Safety Executive? Did you think that was an intruder role? That I was lying?
avatar
JMich: My action is a hindering one. I will be picking the person I find scummiest for it. And the person I find scummiest is usually the one I vote for. So see my vote reasoning for why I chose to roleblock you.
More vagueness and non-answering.
avatar
drealmer7: You've been wholly non-helpful this ENTIRE time. Non-contributory, antagonistic, hypocritical even.
avatar
JMich: Sounds I'm doing a proper job then.
So, to me, that's basically a confirmation that your goal is to not help the crew achieve their goal, because I'm trying to find the intruders, you're just, hmmm, yes, being scummy/anti-town, very much so.

On to other things


avatar
Bookwyrm627: If the dispatcher dies, does someone else become the dispatcher?
I think yes, from my understanding of how things generally work in roles like that. I think he would even possibly appoint someone himself.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: Bold 3: Liar, the post I quoted and replied to was addressed to adalia, not me. :P
Sorry, no, regardless of the quote, I still have asked your opinions and not received them, and it is frustrating. I understand you might have not had time to digest it all well-enough yet, I didn't mean to be so harsh about it, I'm just trying to get us all to work together to handle this intruder situation.
avatar
drealmer7: I pointed that out already. Go back and read the logs and follow along and get all caught up, please, until then I'm not even going to listen to anything you have to say because you're just talking out of your ass if you really didn't pay much attention to yesterday or catch up on the happenings yet (and apparently not even today.)
avatar
Bookwyrm627: I was typing up a post as I was re-reading from my last post. I noticed you commented in a similar vein, but I decided not to remove my remarks on the same topic.
You are allowed to ignore everything I say. I'd advise against it (naturally), but you are allowed to do so.
Fair enough, I didn't say I was going to ignore what you said, I just said I'm not really going to listen to it, as, it seems like uninformed opinion moreso than anything, is all, of course I'm still going to pay attention to everything that goes on (cept for the damn mis-reads that have happened, grrr!)
avatar
drealmer7: Here is my full claim, everyone:

I am Tawny Somerset, your Health and Safety Executive.

I can investigate any of the individuals who took part in the Crisis Event.
avatar
Bookwyrm627: Your "full claim" is missing something: when you investigate, what sort of result are you supposed to get? Stats? Alignment? Role? Flavor? Race (Human/Alien/Droid/Other)?
I have no idea on the specifics, I would think that when I investigate, I'd find out then, which is why I'd investigate, you never know what you're going to turn up. I'm sure if I were to turn up anything, it would be useful, but I may just get a general reply like "Bookwyrm627 did not try to make the crisis event fail," which is still somewhat useful, I suppose.
I guess it still isn't a full claim though because I didn't give my stats (STR: 4 FIN: 3 INT: 8) or put my alignment (station crew, obviously)? Now it's a full claim, I think. Whoopie doo!

More people need to be contributing more thoughts. Everyone is playing way too timid.
avatar
drealmer7: More people need to be contributing more thoughts.
I had a couple foie gras corn dogs for dinner. Basically, haute cuisine meets carnival food. I think they were pretty awesome.
avatar
drealmer7: More people need to be contributing more thoughts.
avatar
Krypsyn: I had a couple foie gras corn dogs for dinner. Basically, haute cuisine meets carnival food. I think they were pretty awesome.
Not in-depth enough. You need to describe flavor, texture, how many stars would you rate it.

You're not really trying, are you?