It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Community
General discussionForum Mafia #31: Crisis at Space Station Epsilon(2361 posts)(2361 posts)
(2361 posts)
Pages:
1
25
50
75
83
84
85
86
87
125
150
158
This is my favourite topic
Posted October 20, 2015
avatar
RWarehall: But, I'll say one last thing about Flub's wagon, the fact it has stalled so quickly is really making me believe we might be onto something.
This is what I believe about the HypersomniacLive wagon.
Posted October 20, 2015
avatar
RWarehall: Your insults aside
Which ones? You may need to check the dictionary for that.

avatar
RWarehall: , what have you brought?
Insight. As opposed to the empty hollow words you bring as testaments.

avatar
RWarehall: You sit here and criticize...
Because you do nothing. Nothing at all.

avatar
RWarehall: I gave my reasons, you may buy them or not, whatever...but for you to dismiss them out of hand because "the Great HijacK" finds them faulty somehow...
They reek of shallowness, reasons that you are so obtuse you cannot even explain. I asked you to detail. I got bored being ignored. You're scummy.

avatar
RWarehall: Yes, my list is based differently than most. The result leaves a handful of players who have contributed nothing, like you HijacK.
Says the one who besides a list made of imaginary motives hasn't brought shit to the table. Ironically hilarious.

avatar
RWarehall: I explained why I'm not on Drealmer's wagon, because I just don't believe that a new player, with a scum PM and the OP role example, would be the first to claim and come up with a role of Health & Safety Administrator. And while involved in some scuff-ups, I find the lack of knowledge and potentially scummy behavior to be generally consistent which a new player. That any bad vibes I feel are outweighed by the unlikelihood of that claim.
Your feelings are not facts, hence why I do no consider what you are saying worth while. You can share an opinion. I will not take it for granted.

avatar
RWarehall: While I refuse to go into exactly why, I feel the larger list of players acted according to how they compared PM's. Especially the earliest ones to react.
And then you wonder why I'm calling you on it. Hollow statements. Hollow statements.

avatar
RWarehall: As to the list, I feel its more a living list. It's certainly not set in stone. If those "confirmed" start taking scummy actions, it can be reassessed. The term "confirmed" is always a misnomer in these games anywhere. One always has to compare actions and make judgments. For now, those players apparently saw through the unfortunately verbose claim.
Backing down on your statements already?

avatar
RWarehall: But, I'll say one last thing about Flub's wagon, the fact it has stalled so quickly is really making me believe we might be onto something. That its very possible that his scum buddies are dragging their feet hoping for a no-lynch. Especially with how people were throwing votes around willy-nilly earlier in the game. Funny how people can vote on thin air, but all of a sudden can't vote for an uncontributing lurker because he hasn't "done anything scummy".
I'll say one thing about you. I find amusing how people are more willing to vote for a lurker than for someone who made obviously scummy actions.
Posted October 20, 2015
avatar
drealmer7: So, JMich, why don't you do more question-posing, cross-examining, etc., like you suggest yogsloth to do?
Yog is known for his stance of "Lynch all lurkers" and "Slaughter the useless", which is an overly aggressive stance. I'm suggesting to him to not be so focused on the number of posts one makes (or doesn't make), but instead to try and coax the lurkers to respond, and should they fail, have a reason to vote them. I can't currently do a proper re-read, so I can't do such cross examinations.

avatar
drealmer7: Why make a comment about your sarcasm detector instead of just address the issue presented to you by HSL?
Bread crumbing. Or not.
I know my Day 1 isn't up to the question posing standards people expect (do they? really?), so I wasn't sure if HSL meant it sarcastically or not. So instead of answering one way or another, I ask for clarification.

avatar
drealmer7: JMich seems fine for now though I'm curious if you still really think I'm most likely to be an intruder? And if so, is there anything I can do to try and alleviate your suspicion? I really suppose it's just a matter of time, or that you are scum and are trying to keep some heat on me for validation of a future attack. I do question why you haven't contributed more to the other goings-on D1 and seem to have mostly contributed when it comes to me, is it because you are sure I'm town but want to keep doubt in others so I remain a viable candidate? *rhetorical* I only keep it in mind as a slight possibility, as any aware player should do.
Your play style irks me. That by itself isn't enough to warrant a vote, but it does mean that my limited time is focused on reading (and trying to understand the RP) your posts a bit more closely. Day 1 is filled with fluff that makes it hard to recognize the important bits, so I'm focusing on one or two people until more info is available.
Posted October 20, 2015
avatar
HijacK: snip
Another useless post of yours...
Full of insults and zero usefulness...
You are scum...very obvious...
You are trying too hard to save your scum buddies as I've put too many on my list...
Posted October 20, 2015
I wonder if we are going to get a vote count before the deadline? That would be all sorts of useful.

Since I am guessing he has the most votes currently, and I don't want a No Lynch:

Unvote: HypersomniacLive
Vote: flubbucket

He is pretty middle of the pack as far as my reads go. The only thing of which I am fairly certain is that he isn't vanilla.
Posted October 20, 2015
avatar
RWarehall: Another useless post of yours...
Full of insults and zero usefulness...
You are scum...very obvious...
You are trying too hard to save your scum buddies as I've put too many on my list...
You're beyond ridiculous and scum at that. Unless you eliminate me tonight I'll be all over your ass tomorrow.
Posted October 20, 2015
avatar
HijacK: Unless you eliminate me tonight I'll be all over your ass tomorrow.
Yep. He is certainly at, or near, the top of my Scumlist as well.
Posted October 20, 2015
Need to leave for an appointment. I'm really curious as to how this day will end. If flub flips scum it will be no more luckier than the hit on CSPVG was the previous game. I'll just say that he plays pretty much like usual. People haven't voted for him due to this in the past (well, except yogsloth). What changed?
Posted October 20, 2015
QA is offline and deadline ETA assumed to be ~3 hours, so I’ll toss in another unofficial count.
Last official votecount (#1221):

flubbucket: 4 (mchack, trentonlf, RWarehall, yogsloth)
HypersomniacLive: 3 (Krypsyn, Ixamyakxim, dedoporno)
Ixamyakxim: 2 (HypersomniacLive, Vitek)
Vitek: 2 (Crewdroog, drealmer7)
agentcarr16: 1 (CarrionCrow)
drealmer7: 1 (Jmich)
trentonlf: 1 (flubbucket)
RWarehall: 1 (HijacK)

Not voting: agentcarr16*


Changes:
Agent’s unvote becomes official, asterisk removed (1226)
Krypsyn unvotes HSL, votes flub (1265)

Unofficial Result:
flubbucket: 5 (mchack, trentonlf, RWarehall, yogsloth, Kryp)
HypersomniacLive: 2 (Ixamyakxim, dedoporno)
Ixamyakxim: 2 (HypersomniacLive, Vitek)
Vitek: 2 (Crewdroog, drealmer7)
agentcarr16: 1 (CarrionCrow)
drealmer7: 1 (Jmich)
trentonlf: 1 (flubbucket)
RWarehall: 1 (HijacK)
Not voting: agentcarr16

Flub would be closest at L-4
Posted October 20, 2015
avatar
HijacK: snip
No, you are ridiculous...
"Believe me, I know" with no actual reason or analysis whatsoever accomplishes nothing.
The fact you are still so blind as to pretend nothing was learned says volumes.

But go ahead and yell and scream with all your non-reasons...
I'm scummy because you say so, umm, well, hardly a reason...
And should I get confirmed town, are you offering up your head?
Posted October 20, 2015
Flubbucket is amusing.

Deadline is in < 3 hours.

I will be checking back in frequently and will vote to avoid no-lynch.
Posted October 20, 2015
avatar
agentcarr16: Flubbucket is amusing.
Agreed and Noted.
Posted October 20, 2015
avatar
HypersomniacLive: I'm not sure I follow:
- Shot? What do you mean?
You don't know what does it mean to shoot someone?

avatar
HypersomniacLive: I'm not sure I follow:
- What purpose does posting serve in your opinion?
Keeping the game alive?


avatar
flubbucket: Is Alive subjektivní nebo je to neměnný stav bytí ??
Stop cheating with Translator. Subjektivní a neměnný don't even rule out each other.

avatar
flubbucket: So you'd be willing to "vig" me out of my misery??

Thank you old friend.
If I could I would shoot you all.


Gah, I don't want no-lynch either.
Vote HyperSomniacLive.
I'd rather vote Rwarehall but this one's had twice the number of votes.


avatar
agentcarr16: whiteish avatar
What is this treachery? I thought you are LIfhtrasil for a while.
Posted October 20, 2015
avatar
agentcarr16: whiteish avatar
avatar
Vitek: What is this treachery? I thought you are LIfhtrasil for a while.
Sorry. Bolzano-Weierstrass function. Continuous everywhere, differentiable nowhere. Craziest counterexample ever.
Posted October 20, 2015
avatar
QuadrAlien: ...
Deadline at Tuesday 20th October, 20:30 GMT, barring anyone having a decent reason for wanting to extend this. ...
@QUAD Please don't extend the deadline just because we can't decide on who to lynch. Then we simply deserve the no-lynch we'll get. This day dragged on for ages I just want it to stop and get a few days off this game during nighttime. (and to think I've took a free day from work for this...)
Pages:
1
25
50
75
83
84
85
86
87
125
150
158
This is my favourite topic
Community
General discussionForum Mafia #31: Crisis at Space Station Epsilon(2361 posts)(2361 posts)
(2361 posts)