Is that what kids call it nowadays?

Oh, and BTW, my vote for no-lynch shouldn't be quite as scummy now, in light of recent events.

Ah geez Krypsyn, are you Scum again? Man, that sucks for you.

I don't think there's enough time to engineer yet another new wagon in the 8½ hours left to us.

I'm comfortable where I'm at, unless CSPVG can suddenly wow us with something critical in that time. But yep yep yep, we've got some good stuff coming up to take care of as soon as Day 2.

Given the number of folks who implicitly (some a bit explicitly) are corroborating his claim, I must say 'no'. Either HijacK's is the luckiest fake claimer around, or there is something to what he is saying. Regardless, I doubt he is getting lynched Today, and I wont' condone a No Lynch.

Unvote: HijacK
Vote: adaliabooks

If it's just to secure a lynch isn't CSPVG the more viable choice considering he is closer to the brink?

He is closer, but adaliabooks is still scummier to me. CSPVG's only crime is that he is a lurker, unless i missed something. I will certainly move my vote to him to avoid a No Lynch, but he is not my first choice.

My internet connection is leaving a lot to be desired of tonight. If this happens to be a double post (I hint the 'Post my message' button just as I disconnected), I apologise.

Anyway, onto what I meant to post:

You know, maybe the last two 'bold moves' which began the previous two games have deadened us to just how crazy and scummy what yog has done is. This close to the deadline, and for all the reasons stated before (and none of them OMGUS-linked, dedo), I'm going to have to Vote: Yogsloth.

I would like to elaborate (once again) on how posting does not necessarily equate to contributing, but I think that, at this point, would not really be listened to. What I would like to add, however, is this: I am a lurker by accident instead of design. I get into these games thinking that I will have more time than I do, and then try my best to contribute when I can. It is not as if I sit here reading and rereading the thread, thinking to myself,"Haha, I can post now, but I won't!" Yes, I know that this is an excuse, but I beg of you to pick someone that has done something which you consider scummy, instead of someone you consider to 'not have contributed enough'. This could be me, of course. I'd just like my fellow townies to off me, if off me they must, for a better reason.

Pre-post edit: I am still totally in the dark as to what Our Lord, Yoggle-Boggle the Mighty is up to. I'm most likely be thick, but my vote stays where it is. I remain unconvinced that either yog or (now seemingly) agent 'have' anything at all.

Noted.

Boy...

OK, my vote does stay as well. Thank you for the content, and that's not sarcasm. You do seem to be reading yesterday's newspaper, but I can now feel a little better about the inherent risk of voting a lurker. We've got enough to at least start to play for realsies now.

btw, can I keep "Yoggle-Boggle the Mighty"?

Well, after reading CSPVG's "defense", adlaiabooks was no longer my scummiest target.

CSPVG, 'tis almost the worst thing you could possibly write. I acknowledge internet problems are nasty things, but there should be several alternative methods, including reading the pages while you're not online.

unvote Krypsyn

V-v-v-vote CSPVG

I'm not totally convinced you're anti-town, but it's imperative you actually notice everything that's going on. By no means am I the one person who 'has' something. For future reference; yogsloth, dedoporno, Krypsyn, JMich, myself, and perhaps a few others 'have' something. And I'm pretty certain there aren't six anti-town out of fourteen players.

Allright. I can understand that reasoning. Thanks. And thanks as well for clarifying the misunderstanding about your claim. If your claim is true, with all it's implications, then some things make a lot more sense. I'm not totally conviced yet, (after all you have made up crazy sounding claims before), but I do hope your claim is true and I am willing to wait and see what the next day brings.

For now, I am not willing to vote HijacK today anymore and I am also not sure lynching Yog would be a good idea anymore. That leaves me with just one viable option: in case of doubt, lynch a lurker.

vote CSPVG

Lurking was just too beneficial to scum last game and it is in any case not beneficial to town.

That puts CSPVG at L-2, am I right?