HijacK: Not solid enough to mention it every time. Looks like you're trying to be all friendly with everyone.
So I'll throw this to the group. Do you want me to stop?
I'm the kind of person that says "please" and "thank you" all the time. However, if people think I'm trying to brownnose, or butter everyone up, then say so and I'll stop.
BlueMooner: I pointed it out, and you didn't feel people talking about you was worth looking into??
HijacK: No. I did not feel that. Got a problem with that?
Yes, I think it's suspicious.
Agent was dissecting Yog's posts and looking at factors like him starting all his posts with "So", and his capitalization
mistake. I've spent too many years online and seen too many typos to even begin to think that's some sort of super secret coded message on Yog's part. However as Flub pointed out, it's a different story to miss a name altogether, especially when he explained he was making a list of players and grouping them based on suspicion, and MOST especially after claiming to be cop.
His "oopsy" explanation does not sit well with me. While I don't care about typos, I do care about missing names and it does make me wonder if Yog was "saying" something by not including you. Now it's possible that you didn't think it was a big deal and just thought Yog messed up, but I don't know that that's actually the case... I'm not you. I have the slightest sense that you didn't say anything because maybe you didn't want to draw attention to yourself, hoping everyone would overlook it. Which to me, is suspicious. Why hide, unless you're hiding something.
This insistent info fishing sounds more like role fishing to me, on the very day 1.
Isn't it called scumhunting? Why are you defensive about roles, when I never asked about them?
Not only that, you also argued for a no-lynch
I didn't argue for a no-lynch, I ASKED about it, since I'm still learning game theory.
Unvote agent
Vote BlueMooner
On a personal note, I got the sense that my posts upset you. Your responses seemed irritated with me. I don't know why, since I thought it was clear from the context and tone of my post that I was 1) being playful, and 2) trying to stir the pot to get players more actively engaged and initiate some banter. Didn't you yourself comment on that?
BlueMooner: Maybe I'm just overexcited at my first game and want something to HAPPEN already.
HijacK: Fascinating. So you want something to happen, but you're waiting for it. Hmmmmm. Not the party starter, are you?
So I'm Starting a Party, or Stirring a Pot. (settle down agent, that doesn't mean anything).
I care about people's feelings, which is partly why I try to be nice to everybody. You don't seem to be that type. Normally I'd apologize here if I had accidentally upset you, but since you think I'm kissing-up to people, I won't.
It also occurs to me that IF you were trying to stay under the radar and not mention yourself because you're mafia, and then someone questioned you on it, a strong response might be a common tactic to try to fend me off, thinking I'll back down. The fact that you jumped IMMEDIATELY to a vote on me, simply for throwing out wild statements at people which were MEANT to be provocative but not serious (Hyper and CS didn't so much as blink), seems defensive and suspicious. Suspicious enough to vote.
Vote Hijack trentonlf: To me the greatest weapon town has is the vote. It puts pressure on people so reactions can be gauged, it shows who people really think is behaving in a scummy manner or think is scum (that's why people are upset with adaliaboks for just voting random), and gives town a sense of uniformity in their decisions. Voting is underused IMO.
This answers my question, thank y... um, nothing.
JMich: Prod preventing post. Will try to catch up later tonight though.
*puts prod back down*