HypersomniacLive: Really? What happened to
this? Not good enough to place your vote? Or are you still in RVS?
Not quite yet. I'm mildly concerned about him, but not really any more than I am about say trent, or JMich or Lift.
I'm still waiting for some more info to go on.
adaliabooks: As for Krypsyn's argument, if a wagon grows on a player whom I'm voting that I don't agree with I'll move my vote, simple as that.
dedoporno: Then what's the point of having a vote at all? If you vote for a person you need to vote for - good. But what is the point of random voting if you are going to back off if a wagon starts to form?
I only said I would move my vote if I didn't agree with the wagon. If for example CSPVG does something that makes me consider him more townie then I will move my vote. If a wagon suddenly builds on him because, I don't know, he refers to 'Town' instead of us or we then I will remove my vote because that's a stupid reason to lynch anyone. But if he decides to claim nexus or PGO or suggests scum might chat during the day then I'll leave it where it is.
If someone else presents as scummier I will move my vote accordingly, I don't really see what's so complicated about it...
yogsloth: My theory is that it's a Quixotic quest to prove some sort of political point about Day 1 lynching. He got hosed on it last game so he's determined to keep bashing away at that same path until we all throw our hands in the air and mea culpa and announce we all realize he was right all along.
We've hit the point in Day 1 of this game where I'm getting ready to see how many jellybeans I can stick up my nose, just to keep myself entertained.
:D
Call me Sancho