It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
adaliabooks: My play is not better than anyone else's, I didn't claim that it was. I just find that yours tends to be worse.
Let's look at a comparison. I'm often less erroneous than you in judgement. I don't make as many stupid plays (i.e. you last game). I don't quite put words in other people's mouths like you were caught doing.

If mine's worse than everyone else's, yours is just beyond terrible.

avatar
adaliabooks: Distractions aren't threats. This is a distraction, it serves no benefit to town, it's not a threat. Unless you mean you are a threat to town when you distract us from scum hunting?
Am I distracting anyone? I seem to recall you making a ridiculous statement to which I corrected you. Not only you implied that I know better, you went on to confront me. Who's distracting who?

avatar
adaliabooks: He wasn't lynched, but it was suggested that he should be policy lynched for claiming PGO. There are other examples, but I can't be bothered to root them out.
That's because there are none others.

avatar
adaliabooks: Yup, so I'm just gonna leave it here. We don't like each other's playstyles, we don't agree with how we choose to play and our bickering will do nothing more than distract everyone else (and no doubt annoy them too), as it seems to every game.
What can I say? It would be unwise of me to let hyperboles to float around while we scum hunt.
I am home and free from the confines of work! Anyone else need a drink?

avatar
yogsloth: I am neither lying, nor kidding, nor Scum. I am also not trying to get lynched - quite the opposite. I'd like to continue playing as long as possible.
avatar
adaliabooks: I'd just like to point out that if you were lying or scum then of course you would say that.

And if you are saying you are genuinely claiming Town Cop then you are both stupid and most likely dead.
But I'm interested to see where this is going, colour me intrigued for now.
It seems that intrigued is something most people are by yogs play..


avatar
cristigale: Count yourself lucky on this one. :-)
Very Lucky. That show is an embarrassment to NJ and having to explain to people that the cast is mostly from NY and NJ residence normally do not fist pump and nor do we all look like we rolled in a bag of Doritos. ---I think it really is time for a drink now. Will read more in a min
avatar
HijacK: Is it just me or do I feel a deja vu?
I'm not sure.

I'm having a feeling of vuja de. You know that feeling that sometime somewhere I've never done any of this before....
avatar
HijacK: Is it just me or do I feel a deja vu?
avatar
flubbucket: I'm not sure.

I'm having a feeling of vuja de. You know that feeling that sometime somewhere I've never done any of this before....
Parlez-vous francais? Non? J'ai pense que non :)
avatar
cristigale: Either way, scum must be wondering what his angle is as well.
The way your post is this I could be reading this wrong so better to ask. Do you find yogs to be town as of right now or is this based on if he is telling the truth?
avatar
CSPVG: I will, however, catch up and post something when I get back tonight.
I would love to hear your thoughts on everything so far.

avatar
flubbucket: Lack of further votes on yogsloth noteworthy...
I think this is something he wanted. Attention and yet a spark of could he be town cop thrown in. Just enough to keep the votes away from him and everyone waiting to see what is next or what he is doing. And yet I still feel this is a bit of look at me!! so you do not look at something else. But there is enough of a mind screw that I am confused as I am finding yogs play very different and I have to stop taking other games into account.


avatar
Sage103082: I am off to play some KQ Ill
avatar
BlueMooner: Are you playing GOGs KQ3, or from "elsewhere"?
I am sorry. You will learn very quickly - I am a horrible speller and my grammar leaves a ton to be desired. =)
This should of had a ' as in I'll and a period before that. I was playing KQ the new release. Sadly it is not from GOG (As I do not think it is here yet) but do not fret I have all of old King's Quest from GOG as well as on floppies and CDs

avatar
BlueMooner: ******************************************

Now, this may be wrong on my part, especially since nobody else has said anything, but I want to ask about Trent. Trent kept asking over and over what some of us thought Yog is up to. Sure, Yog became all anyone could talk about first post, but when some of us said that we thought there may be a method to his madness and we didn't think we should elaborate, Trent kept pushing for more info. Am I mistaken?

Nobody else explained their reasons, but I at least said that I think Yog's actions are potentially town+. Maybe others agree or think something else, but Trent seemed to ignore that completely. Sure, I'm a newb, and my opinion isn't worth much, but if you cared about town wouldn't that give you some pause? Wouldn't you think "hey, I don't know wtf Yog is doing, but others seem to think it's town+, so I'll let it go"?

Yes, everybody's dissecting Yog's statement, but Trent seemed to keep pushing for us to share WHY we think it's town+, to give details, even though we said doing so might... interfere. And if you're trying to interfere with something town+, isn't that town-, and therefore scummy?

Thoughts?
ok I bolded my first part I want to touch on. I do not like the way on this line of thinking. Scum can easily push a idea or thought on to us and as they have more information, if we go with this line of thought then we might fall into follow the leader down a wrong path. I think it is best for everyone to express their own thoughts and go on that and not to just follow the pack. I also find it hard to have yogs as a town+ with his opening statement as hey im town cop! I think there is way more to it and as of right now I dunno what but I in no way have yogs as a confirmed town right now.
avatar
yogsloth: Do note, however, that most rookie mistakes are forgiven
avatar
HijacK: What? Since when? I recall during flub's ranch game being all over cristi and ddickinson for making extremely questionable rookie plays. I don't quite think you're sincere here.
I did make a poor rookie play, I deserved it. It just so happened that the RL stuff that occurred at the time very likely played a part in my decision. I was focused on the protective aspect of the role and failed to properly weigh the full liability of the blocking part.

In any case, this rookie mistake seems lesser in comparison. Something we should keep in mind is that if mchack is scum, it was actually a clever play. I don’t read this situation like that, but it’s a possibility.

avatar
agentcarr16: I'm reading back through the thread, and I'm picking up on a few little things that I missed first time around.

avatar
Krypsyn: I can; scum.
avatar
agentcarr16: Sorry, lol, but that semi-colon caught my eye this time. It should be a colon.
Lol, I learned something. Knew part of it but not all. “Use those semicolons carefully or don’t use them at all” Yes, Ma'am :-)
avatar
flubbucket: I'm not sure.

I'm having a feeling of vuja de. You know that feeling that sometime somewhere I've never done any of this before....
avatar
agentcarr16: Parlez-vous francais? Non? J'ai pense que non :)
Nope. But I do know some french words:

..........toast

..........fries

..........braid

..........vanilla

..........bread

..........connection

..........drain

..........horn

..........poodle

..........kiss

..........quarter

..........revolution
A lot of mis-use of the phrase "policy lynch".

A policy lynch has nothing to do with how someone plays. It's a lynch of an unverifiable role, not the player currently playing it. i.e., you lynch the Paranoid Gun Owner or the Nexus because those are roles that can't be verified. You lynch because otherwise a Scum could claim one of those roles and go unchallenged. Has nothing to do with the behavior of the player.
avatar
yogsloth: A lot of mis-use of the phrase "policy lynch".

A policy lynch has nothing to do with how someone plays. It's a lynch of an unverifiable role, not the player currently playing it. i.e., you lynch the Paranoid Gun Owner or the Nexus because those are roles that can't be verified. You lynch because otherwise a Scum could claim one of those roles and go unchallenged. Has nothing to do with the behavior of the player.
You might want to check the page that Krypsyn linked to.
avatar
Sage103082: I think there is way more to it and as of right now I dunno what but I in no way have yogs as a confirmed town right now.
Exactly! Nor is he a confirmed non-town or a liar ;)


avatar
HijacK: Ha. You'd be surprised.
Try me!
avatar
agentcarr16: Parlez-vous francais? Non? J'ai pense que non :)
avatar
flubbucket: Nope. But I do know some french words:

..........toast

..........fries

..........braid

..........vanilla

..........bread

..........connection

..........drain

..........horn

..........poodle

..........kiss

..........quarter

..........revolution
lol, awesome. And I actually learned something! Hmm... so a French Drain is the same thing as weeping tiles. :)

I had to because 'deja vu' means, literally, 'already seen'.
'Vuja de' on the other hand, just means, ummm... I think you just coined a phrase!?!
avatar
cristigale: Lol, I learned something. Knew part of it but not all. “Use those semicolons carefully or don’t use them at all” Yes, Ma'am :-)
Heh... I actually missed him correcting me. Honestly, whether or not I was wrong depends on how he interpreted my statement. In the sense of making my response more clear, he is entirely correct.

I was using the word 'scum' as a sentence fragment, although it makes just as much sense, perhaps more, as the focus of my previous words directly.

My full statement would have been something like this: "I can tell you who learns most. It is most likely scum." So, that is how I arrived at the semi-colon instead of the colon. However, the colon is more logical and direct in this instance, so I would certainly edit it to a colon if I could; the semi-colon is superfluous.
avatar
cristigale: Lol, I learned something. Knew part of it but not all. “Use those semicolons carefully or don’t use them at all” Yes, Ma'am :-)
avatar
Krypsyn: Heh... I actually missed him correcting me. Honestly, whether or not I was wrong depends on how he interpreted my statement. In the sense of making my response more clear, he is entirely correct.

I was using the word 'scum' as a sentence fragment, although it makes just as much sense, perhaps more, as the focus of my previous words directly.

My full statement would have been something like this: "I can tell you who learns most. It is most likely scum." So, that is how I arrived at the semi-colon instead of the colon. However, the colon is more logical and direct in this instance, so I would certainly edit it to a colon if I could; the semi-colon is superfluous.
*grin*

Yeah, that's me. The Grammar Police. I tell ya, the people on this forum...

I figured that that would have been your full statement, and that the 'scum' was a sentence fragment. That was the reason that a colon would be more proper. I had to think about it though, and I actually watched through the clip to see if I was right before I posted it :)
avatar
agentcarr16: Yeah, that's me. The Grammar Police. I tell ya, the people on this forum...
Hehe... I am pretty persnickety about grammar as well, although I tend to get lazy on the internet. Also, I must confess I an way too enamored of the semi-colon in general, and I use it far too much. It has been for as long as I can remember, so it isn't a new thing. I suppose it is because my thought process is so often tangential that the semi-colon let's me append even more to a single thought.
avatar
HypersomniacLive: You might want to check the page that Krypsyn linked to.
I must admit I've generally written that off as a waste of time and rarely pursue the exercise. I don't need anymore inane youtube videos in my life.