yogsloth: Nicely organized.
You will note that in the post of mine you linked to, I directly say: It's Day 2. My belief remains that we need it the most in further days, and if I'm here in Day 3, I pledge I will give it my best shot to analyze all the wagons side-by-side.
[...].
Thanks, helps with not being tunnel-visioned.
yogsloth: [...]
My criticism of adalia has more to do with his skipping mchack's vote in order to try and pin an ulterior motive on cristigale.
I don't think that adaliabooks did it on purpose (it's not difficult to miss/ mess the timeline of votes if one goes only by the mod's vote count), but how does mchhack's vote change anything in his argument?
Pre-post edit: I see that he took it back, but I''d still like you to answer.
cristigale: @hyper - post #992
I believe that yogs, mchack, and dedo are all part of the town group with direct knowledge about restrictions. (Along with a few others).
I did not intend to paint blue in a negative light. I'm not going kick a guy while he's down. He may be town, may not. Not going there Today. And again for the record, I have him leaning town, but no real proof of it.
I never called you on not voting. I'm using the name you used in past dead threads and mentioned here.. I don't remember you voting for anyone on day one in past games. That's why I found it surprising. Your apparent new boldness in voting day one lead me to believe this might be the scum version of Hyper.
I'm not purposefully delaying, I'm using the time available to me when I have it. My post #955 was posted 2 minuets after adalia posted #954. (At least that's what it said on my phone) I noticed adalia asked the same question but thought with the time difference it would be obvious I was ninjaed. I doubt anyone can back it up now. If you really thought it was an hour, perhaps my phone doesn't sync well. I did not see adalia's post until after I posted.
A couple of your posts in Game #27 beg to differ on "I never called you on not voting. Anyway.
I guess one should not try and improve their play lest they'd be immediately thought of being scum. I can always go back to not voting if it'd make you happy, but if you think that I'm scum, then perhaps you should vote me.
As for the rest, I've seen this sort of arguments from you before to take them at face value. Until some evidence dictates otherwise, question-mark stays.
Krypsyn: HijacK said he was "Reserve" , so this implies that he is not the main one, but a back-up (I even thing he said as much). Thus, there is no way for him to prove his claim immediately unless the first Guru dies. If you mean that he could be confirmed by a role at Night? Possibly, but that would still give him another Night, as scum, and there is no guarantee that town has, or wold even use, that role on him.
[...]
There's also no guarantee that town has not a role that could confirm (or not) his role, nor is there a guarantee that the role-holder wouldn't use it on him. So, that's not much of an argument as to why you did not take every possibility into account, especially since you demand it from others.
Krypsyn: [...]
I am Bull (Town Overprotective Orderly). My role is a sort of Restriction-Blocker/Jailer, I guess, although it was never stated as such. I can target a person and take them to my room to keep them safe from bullying or intimidation by other contestants, but there is a chance I will block them from using their Night action. The ability will work on only those who that lack confidence in themselves and need sheltering.
[...]
This also implies that scum has a restrictor role, else why would my role even exist, and thus they may be privy to information some town players feel only they know.
[...]
Krypsyn: [...] My role only works to save people from getting restricted,[...]
I'm having a bit of difficulty following what your role supposedly does. As adaliabooks said, you claim to shelter people from getting restricted and also that your role only works on those that are already restricted. It doesn't make sense
And all the arguments you used against HijacK apply to you too if you're scum.
On a side note - that part about taking people to your room at night, sounds pretty perverted. ;-P
adaliabooks: [...]. If there is a scum 'restrictor' [...]
I had wondered if CSPVG had permanent roleblocking abilities as a Mafia Thief.
yogsloth: [...]
If I'm right?
You know the drill.
<----------------------------
I'm pretty sure no-one here wants to have anything to do with your arse, so could you please stop with this tasteless joke?