HereForTheBeer: Semi-satirical kool-aid. I shoulda put a ; ) instead of a : )
I do think it's a dumb sales gimmick, especially considering the repetitions, but I don't find it at all consumer-unfriendly. And certainly not a psychological attack, at least not by any definition that I would consider serious.
Heard several comments of that sort in the other thread, that it's hurting the customer. I invite anyone hurt by the flash sale gimmick to post their story of how voluntarily buying a game at a discount caused harm.
jepsen1977: I get that this thread is supposed to be funny but I am genuinely interested in hearing your take on lootboxes and it's relations to gambling. In other words: outside of outright scams, how much consumer-protection do you think there should be if any? Can it all be counted as poor impulse-control management on the part of the consumer or is there such a thing as "predatory" behaviour on the part of the seller?
I have to waffle on this one, sorry. I've never tried lootboxes myself, so I can't really speak to the cost, the value, and the effects good or bad. I don't even know how they're implemented in a game. I'll read deeper the next time a lootbox thread comes up, though.
Breja: So first you tell me the true intention of the thread went over my head, and then you proceed to produce this wall of pro-flash sale text.
I see. If you want my position on the matter, read post 9. And 25, too. Post 1 gives a bit of a tongue-in-cheek thumbs-up to flash sales, mostly because I think the premise in the other thread is really weak and somewhat ridiculous, and not backed up with anyone saying how they were actually harmed by this flash sale. So far it's all conjecture. My bad for not making it obvious that it was tongue-in-cheek. The later posts state not that I'm pro-flash sale, but that I disagree that it's causing harm - and give reasons why I disagree with the anti-flash argument. If there is something you don't understand about my position after reading the later posts, fee free to ask.
I understand why they don't like the mechanics of the sale; I also think the gimmick is stupid. What I don't see is how a voluntary 3-step purchase process - with the opportunity to get a refund after - is anti-consumer.