Posted March 21, 2020
low rated
Oh hi. So I hesitate to post anything because I'm not familiar with the community, but I've been running into confusions that have been alarming me lets say, and I thought it would be useful to share in the threads for those who make decisions about the storefront, Galaxy and everything. I realize that's not likely as this would need to be miraculously upvoted to some height, but anyway here I go:
I'm not completely new to GoG - many, many years ago I think I bought Beneath a Steel Sky - but I am new to today's GoG. Everything is very nice, but I find the library of games contained in my profile links to be kinda odd. I understand that Galaxy is supposed to be used for everything - and that's what everyone wants which is fine - but what's left over for those of us who refuse to have yet another real nice platform piled up onto our desktop is basically just several download links with little explanation of what the hell they might be, and various inconsistencies between titles..
Please don't become disgusted with these luddite words that are coming from my furiously typing fingers - I know what all the files are after puzzling them out and I use Steam just fine. I have used Epic very, very briefly and will not comment further on that; I've used Battlenet in the past when I actually wanted to play their games; I used Origin for a long time before it started getting too EA'y and unpleasant and I've even used the Microsoft Storefront once, which of course I regret to this day.
Why not Galaxy too? Apart from the casual disdain shown above, all of these things together are like a row of retail shops in a mall - and a mall is the very last @&!$ thing I want to deal with anywhere. I finally drew the line for Good Old Games when I first realized a flagship client had been built. I personally was like "No, not like this..." or maybe "Et tu, Brute?" but to be honest I understand why Galaxy has probably been fun to build and also is a good idea survival-wise.
So, after ranting about that, I'll say that the installers could use a boilerplate blurb explaining what they might be about: Why there are multiple parts, what an archive file probably is, what the actual installer might be, that installers sometimes are packed in zip's, that some titles are not always posted with Windows as the default OS... funny, I felt pretty dumb googling "what the hell is an sh file" before I caught that one. Wherever have you been, thrice beloved Linux?
I get the feeling that we're being gently pushed into using Galaxy., That might be fine for many, but I recall clearly as a child being "gently pushed" onto the ride Space Mountain at Disneyland, and as a tiny and skittish 9 year old the result was nightmare material for quite a while. I'm still leery about giant glowing orbs in the dark, which maybe isn't a bad thing now that I think of it... IF I don't want to go there, I also prefer not to be pushed there. Oh well, these have been my words.
P.S. Those quotes are from The Matrix and The Forum respectively. It is March after all, and interestingly the site where young Julius was finally set upon is now a feral cat colony, or was at least. How the times mock themselves...
I'm not completely new to GoG - many, many years ago I think I bought Beneath a Steel Sky - but I am new to today's GoG. Everything is very nice, but I find the library of games contained in my profile links to be kinda odd. I understand that Galaxy is supposed to be used for everything - and that's what everyone wants which is fine - but what's left over for those of us who refuse to have yet another real nice platform piled up onto our desktop is basically just several download links with little explanation of what the hell they might be, and various inconsistencies between titles..
Please don't become disgusted with these luddite words that are coming from my furiously typing fingers - I know what all the files are after puzzling them out and I use Steam just fine. I have used Epic very, very briefly and will not comment further on that; I've used Battlenet in the past when I actually wanted to play their games; I used Origin for a long time before it started getting too EA'y and unpleasant and I've even used the Microsoft Storefront once, which of course I regret to this day.
Why not Galaxy too? Apart from the casual disdain shown above, all of these things together are like a row of retail shops in a mall - and a mall is the very last @&!$ thing I want to deal with anywhere. I finally drew the line for Good Old Games when I first realized a flagship client had been built. I personally was like "No, not like this..." or maybe "Et tu, Brute?" but to be honest I understand why Galaxy has probably been fun to build and also is a good idea survival-wise.
So, after ranting about that, I'll say that the installers could use a boilerplate blurb explaining what they might be about: Why there are multiple parts, what an archive file probably is, what the actual installer might be, that installers sometimes are packed in zip's, that some titles are not always posted with Windows as the default OS... funny, I felt pretty dumb googling "what the hell is an sh file" before I caught that one. Wherever have you been, thrice beloved Linux?
I get the feeling that we're being gently pushed into using Galaxy., That might be fine for many, but I recall clearly as a child being "gently pushed" onto the ride Space Mountain at Disneyland, and as a tiny and skittish 9 year old the result was nightmare material for quite a while. I'm still leery about giant glowing orbs in the dark, which maybe isn't a bad thing now that I think of it... IF I don't want to go there, I also prefer not to be pushed there. Oh well, these have been my words.
P.S. Those quotes are from The Matrix and The Forum respectively. It is March after all, and interestingly the site where young Julius was finally set upon is now a feral cat colony, or was at least. How the times mock themselves...