Cloud Atlas
Let's be clear about one thing: Cloud Atlas is absolutely epic in scope. Perhaps one of the most ambitious films I've ever seen just in terms of how much it tries to do. 6 different self-contained plots set in wildly different times and places, and with wildly different themes and tones, all mashed together as one. It's an idea that is perhaps doomed to fail, which is why it's so impressive that Cloud Atlas makes it work. Makes it work marvelously, in fact. All the stories fit together nearly seamlessly, with the dramatic and emotional arcs aligning and diverging at just the right times. The overall impression can verge on being awe-inspiring. That said, the movie fares significantly less well if you examine the individual plots, which are all "been there done that" at best and downright patronizing at worst. It's a movie about the big picture, not the little details. And the big picture is quite nice, but perhaps not significantly nicer than a more traditionally focused movie (in other words, Looper is still my pick for "Best Film." Although I haven't seen Argo yet...).
It can be very emotional, in a sort of ethereal abstract way. It touches you, perhaps even deeply. But yet I left the theater feeling like something was missing. It was almost something truly beautiful. Almost, bu not quite. And I think the problem is that most of its effectiveness comes just from seeing the lives of these different people playing out together and aligning in different ways, and not from actually having anything thought provoking to say. It hints at deep truths, but never actually uncovers them. But then, I found The Matrix to be woefully full of itself as well, whereas everyone else seems to think it was some incredible philosophical achievement. So I know I'll probably be in a minority about Cloud Atlas. And that's perfectly fine.
I did like it. I liked it a lot, in fact. One of the best films I've seen this year. But it didn't come across as a work of confident artistic maturity. Rather, it was a combination of both clumsy mediocrity and stunning virtuosity, sometimes happening at once. And the result somehow manages to be something special.
EDIT: Wow. Just took a look at Metacritic, and its got a shockingly low critical score. 55/100. I would have expected them to be showering it with praise.
Post edited October 26, 2012 by jefequeso