scientiae: This is actually a good idea. …
skeletonbow: That's fine though because if someone with a low trust actually reports something properly which is in violation, the chances are that there will be many more people reporting it too. So the combination trust of all the people who submit a report is what will affect its position in the queue. If the report gets approved as a violation, then everyone who reported it has their score elevated including those with low trust, so they can still gain trust.
But people who abuse the system more than they use it properly will always end up with a lower trust metric. If someone has a change of face eventually and starts being more responsible with how they use the forums and report things, then they'll gradually gain system trust over time again.
The system would be a sliding trust metric, with some amount higher weight placed on more recent activity than older activity, thus rewarding people who contribute in a positive manner to the system, even if they were the opposite at a previous point in time.
The exact algorithms and how they're tweaked would be an internal thing that is adjusted over time based on how well it works to get the desired results, and to manage corner cases or any ways in which someone figures out a way to abuse the system.
Agreed. :)
ResidentLeever: I don't get why you can't cancel an up- or downvote, I've done it by accident a few times.
Well, I guess the answer would complain about (programming and user) cost versus (goodwill) reward. By user cost I mean this could be alleviated with a confirmation dialog ("Are you sure?"), but that doubles the work (two clicks minimum instead of a single click) or means the metrics can be further revised (not just by people scouring old threads to find people they hate to downvote antiquated comments) as Goggites click madly between up-/down-voting.
ResidentLeever: I don't get why you can't cancel an up- or downvote, I've done it by accident a few times.
GameRager: Good point....the best one can do is push the opposite button. :\
Beat me to it. :)
I have made mistakes myself, and I generally just reverse the vote to amend it. What I mean is, even if the comment wasn't what I would reward with an upvote, if I accidentally downvoted it I would then correct it with an upvote.
But really, it's pretty insignificant when considering individual posts; statistics are useful for measuring quantities of items, not the specific individual instances.