Only can speak for myself of course, but to me the "reading problems" statement doesn't come across as having been made with malicious intent but rather in a sarcastic manner?
Looks like the mod(s) can tell the difference as well, otherwise MarkoH01 surely must have already been banned by now.

Having the original game discs, I find this all very amusing.
It's also why copyright needs to be cut back so people fixing or remastering them should make it worth it.

Babyface Runner. :)

I hope it's possible to mod in the different background for the main menu.

As if.
For starters it was a comment, and by all accounts a true one.
You'd have to be pretty thin skinned to see "reading problems" as an insult.
At most forums I have ever used, at worst you would be given a warning for something like that. Mostly it would be ignored, unless it led to something more.
Clearly you have got some kind of agenda going on, Mr. Spinner.

No matter if it's true or not, it is still an insult. I understand you and your ilk don't want to accept that fact, but it is a fact nonetheless. As to my "agenda" (<plays X-Files theme song for your conspiracy>), it is merely for people to follow the rules that GoG has set forth. Something that seems to be sorely lacking on these forums, which is why these forums have become a joke among other gaming forums. Rules are in place, therefore the rules should be followed. End of story.

It's OK. We understand that you don't know GoG's ToS at all. The reviews were removed, because they violated the rules. But, hey, no matter how many times you tell yourself otherwise, what I stated still remains a fact. Also, to all the individuals downvoting me, it just proves that you are angry at me for stating facts.

Well said.

That's either a lie or an admission of incompetence of your support reps.

Let's take an example. This is the review user "panoloc" wrote on June 24. As far as your review guidelines are concerned, this is acceptable. It's about the game, and it's not abusive (and there are others just like this). So why was it deleted?

I don't know who is downvoting you, but they shouldn't be, you are perfectly entitled to your opinion, despite it being very clear you have an agenda or view things with tunnel vision.

What you are saying does border on obnoxious, but certainly not obnoxious enough to downvote ... but hey, some like yourself interpret things too narrowly and negatively.

I agree 100%. The removal of legitimate negative reviews amounts to an attempt at false advertising by GOG, through trying to manipulate and skew the review score for the game. It might even constituitute illegal behavior in some jurisdictions (which may have laws against false advertising).

The deleted reviews need to be re-instated immediately and I would like to call on GOG's CEO to apologize to the user base and provide an assurance that it won't happen again. Unfortunately, GOG seems to have a problem with admitting when they have done something wrong.

The reviews violated GoG's ToS, which is why they were removed. Keep up.

As has been shown in the evidential images and examples, many of the reviews that were deleted did not violate the ToS. Perhaps you should consider reading what other users have written and stop trolling (as usual)?

<Pats you on your head> No matter how many times you tell yourself that, the fact is that they still violated ToS. Those screenshots (assuming they are actually reviews that were removed... no evidence of that), vast majority were only about ScummVM instead of the game. Those violate the ToS, something you clearly don't understand. Finally, mods, I was insulted (calling me a "Troll"), so are you going to ban Time4Tea? The rules are there for a reason, so use them.

Does it include the original?