It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Travel to Los Angeles A.D. 2019 and witness its revamped looks in a new, enhanced edition of the cult point & click classic.
Genre: Adventure
Discount: 50% off for the owners of the previous GOG version of the Blade Runner game. The latter will be added to every Blade Runner - Enhanced Edition purchase.
avatar
Dogmaus: Normally accepted reviews on GOG are like I don't like this game because you play a woman and I am a boy; this game is jsw communist propaganda because one character is gay or black. Just random letters like dhdhdhfhfbd. Reviews like this are all over the site and never removed in years.
avatar
mrkgnao: One of my favourite examples is this list of eight consecutive reviews on the "We Are the Dwarves" game page (see image). Note how the reviews are all five stars, all by users with a tiny number of games and reviews, all by users with highly convincing user names, and all posted within a period of five days in April 2019.

I wonder why the developers of the game didn't contact GOG to delete these reviews.
"My wife says she is happy with this product"
avatar
UCrest:
avatar
BreOl72: ...
You wrote in your initial post (quote): "Alwa's Awakening was part of the release of its sequel Alwa's Legacy and by popular demand from the community separated the versions into two products".
...
I wouldn't say "by popular demand from the community".
Alwa's Awakening (standalone) was added to catalog the day after release of Alwa's Legacy (bundle).
GOG's AL+AA bundle was always intended to be a time limited launch deal from Elden Pixels' side, but remained listed for weeks due to miscommunication with GOG.
Hello!

Lead Designer of both Alwa's Awakening and Alwa's Legacy here :)

Just thought I'd clarify the bundle we had during launch. When we first discussed this bundle with GOG they suggested it and we agreed because we thought it was a great deal to launch with. But we misunderstood each other and from our side it was a launch offer and from GOG's side it was a permanent bundle. We reached out a few weeks after the release and asked why the bundle was still up and they said it was permanent. We agreed to take it down since it wouldn't be fair to customers on other platforms if one game was given for free.

So this was entirely a result of miscommunication and we're really sorry for any confusion it might have caused. I hope this clarifies this a bit. Thanks!

Mikael Forslind
Elden Pixels
https://www.gog.com/forum/general/alwas_awakening/post12
Post edited June 29, 2022 by JackknifeJohnson
avatar
Linko64: Normally with deleted review it's to control false revies e.g. ranting with no reference to the direct quality of the product. A chunk of these talk directly of the product, deleting them in err....a odd one. I've not had too much time to play the 'enhanced' edition so can't comment on its quality, but there is clearly a issue with it. Deleting reviews in this case is a a bit reckless
avatar
Dogmaus: Normally accepted reviews on GOG are like I don't like this game because you play a woman and I am a boy; this game is jsw communist propaganda because one character is gay or black. Just random letters like dhdhdhfhfbd. Reviews like this are all over the site and never removed in years.
I'm not entirely what their plan is with reviews if they are willing to kill legit ones, even at the request (if that happened) of the dev. It's wrong either way, as too is the silence.
avatar
Timboli: P.S. I'd gotten the impression, because of the long running bad reviews at Steam, and the back story, that Nightdive would be unlikely to address the issues, but now I have read where that might be wrong, and so now I could be really pissed I did not buy the Enhanced Edition when it was 50% off. EDIT - Without the necessary fixes being concrete though, there is still not enough reason for me to buy yet.
The 50%-off is a permanent offer. If you own the previous [ScummVM]-GOG-version you will get the EE with a 50%-discount.

Nightdive isn't usually known for being lazy or greedy in what they do. They gave away their EE to previous owners of System Shock I. They aren't usually known not to iron out bugs when they're made aware of them. Iff possible

---

That in this case it was a very bad move to bundle the SCUMM version with the EE. Mainly because the SCUMM version will still be supported, which wasn't the case with the original release of SS, SIN Gold and others.

I don't like to see old games removed in favor of some EE where the team behind got no work at all on the original that's now no longer available, while being very aware of the fact that if the original version remained and people could buy it instead of the other version, it would outsell them 1000:0.05 any day. BG, NWN, PST or IWD anyone?

In other cases it does hurt because a previously purchased version is removed, a new Ultimate version is added to the store, free for previous owners, the original version is replaced by a generic classic 1.0 release a flash version instead of the deluxe, with which DLC no longer work while still left in the library. To add insult to injury the 'classic version' does contain ad's for the deluxe content and their Ultimate version, where the DLC links in-game lead to a dead website. I'm looking at you, Guild of Dungeoneering! GOG never bothered to ever have them restore the version for deluxe-edition owners so the 1.10 DLC can be used, despite having been made aware of the situation.

That said, for Nightdive, if they wish to safe face, they should add the original Disc-Version of Blade Runner, unbundle the SCUMM version and ride the storm as best they can. GOG is again hurt by this decision and whoever party had them convinced to make the move.

As far as Blade Runner SCUMM is concerned, the best move would be to purchase the EE, file a ticket for refund, let GOG know how you feel and ask to have the original remain in the library. It's free after all so who cares, right? The same could be done with Beamdog's EE when only interested in the original games. Again, can't purchase it anymore, it's bundled and free. That's maybe the only lesson that even thousands of lines of discussion drives home the point to all parties involved: Don't bundle, have your customers make the decision what they want and listen and attend to their every wish instead of listening and obeying to people who don't put money in your pockets on a daily basis. The last one is to you, GOG. Stop listening to parties and 'gamers' but your customers! ;-)
Edit: Sorry for the double post, but totally forgot to mention that the gentleman from ScummVM team who tweeted the much re-tweeted message responded on Steam about a day ago. Not everyone checks the steam forum I reckon, so here it is in the attached screenshot.
Source

avatar
JackknifeJohnson: Thanks for the reply. I checked GOG Support Center:

If you have been a GOG affiliate since before April 2021, you might still be using our legacy affiliates program. The legacy affiliates program has shut down on September 31st, 2021.
avatar
JackknifeJohnson: https://support.gog.com/hc/en-us/articles/4405004689297-How-to-join-the-GOG-Affiliate-Program
AdTraction handles affiliation partnerships for GOG now.

Better to donate to ScummVM directly.
(and not to buy ND's EE)
Thanks a lot for checking it out. Maybe it would be worthwhile to ask ScummVM team if they plan to update to this AdTraction system in the future, as it seems that the old partner affiliate links are no longer supported in general. I had no idea to be honest and maybe they are unaware as well, or simply they don't care much for pursuing it further. However you are absolutely right about the direct support being a better option. Cheers!
Attachments:
Post edited June 29, 2022 by Spectrum_Legacy
avatar
Mori_Yuki: The 50%-off is a permanent offer. If you own the previous [ScummVM]-GOG-version you will get the EE with a 50%-discount.

Nightdive isn't usually known for being lazy or greedy in what they do. They gave away their EE to previous owners of System Shock I. They aren't usually known not to iron out bugs when they're made aware of them. Iff possible
Well hopefully you are correct on both accounts, and the situation with the ScummVM folk is addressed.

And those like myself can just wait ... and hope the base price doesn't increase.
avatar
Spectrum_Legacy:
I always thought buying this Blade Runner original version send a tip to ScummVM but reading the attached screenshot seems not.
high rated
avatar
Spectrum_Legacy:
avatar
argamasa: I always thought buying this Blade Runner original version send a tip to ScummVM but reading the attached screenshot seems not.
@JackknifeJohnson and @Spectrum_Legacy thank you for the information about the outdated referral link. I've forwarded the info to the ScummVM project leaders and they're looking into it.
avatar
neumi5694: afaik you actually get the classic version as bonus if you buy the new one.
avatar
Narushima: Yes, but all that means is you are forced to reward some awful work in order to get the genuine article.
Though technically the same company would still get your money even if it WERE possible to buy the classic version. The only thing that would change were the statistics of sold numbers of a certain project (a thing you cannot see anymore when it comes top a bundle with two products).
avatar
Linko64: It's wrong either way, as too is the silence.
If I am not mistaken "silence" is simply GOGs favorite policy when it comes to the question on how to handle their unsatisfied customer base. I have absolutely no idea why they still follow this policy since they have been told already by (at least) 6 persons from said customer base that silence policy is never working ... maybe they just did not believe them - maybe they weren't even interested for real in what those 6 thought could improve the GOG/customer releations ... it will remain a big mystery to me why the results of two days talks were thrown away completely but we can't understand everything in life I guess.
avatar
Linko64: It's wrong either way, as too is the silence.
avatar
MarkoH01: If I am not mistaken "silence" is simply GOGs favorite policy when it comes to the question on how to handle their unsatisfied customer base. I have absolutely no idea why they still follow this policy since they have been told already by (at least) 6 persons from said customer base that silence policy is never working ... maybe they just did not believe them - maybe they weren't even interested for real in what those 6 thought could improve the GOG/customer releations ... it will remain a big mystery to me why the results of two days talks were thrown away completely but we can't understand everything in life I guess.
I put the link to the archive of the last capture I could find in my short review and here, now, too. That way people can go check out the original and it's reviews:

https://web.archive.org/web/20220530012435/https://www.gog.com/en/game/blade_runner
(sorry, for both links, you'll have to copy/paste instead of click)

avatar
MarkoH01: In the case of Hitman there were quite a lot of "reviews" that weren't reviews at all but pure rants. Unfortunately we don't have any screenshots here of what they actually deleted so we can't tell for sure if they deleted valid reviews there as well. I don't want to say that it wasn't the same I just try to say that it COULD be that it wasn't .. without screenshots we won't know what they really deleted.
Anyone who's interested in looking on archive.org might find evidence of deleted, valid reviews. Here's the capture page:

https://web.archive.org/web/20210801000000*/https://www.gog.com/game/hitman_game_of_the_year_edition
(copy/paste link)
Post edited June 30, 2022 by plan99
avatar
MarkoH01: Speaking of "enhanced". I think I won't buy it any time soon (and I am not sure if this even can be fixed) because ...
https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/the-blade-runner-games-new-remaster-looks-worse
Great link. From the review:
[…]
Released in 1997 by Westwood (yes, the Command & Conquer studio), Blade Runner is not an adaptation of the movie. The adventure game is set in the same city at the same time, but aside from a few cameo appearances it's telling its own story with its own detective hunting for illegal (maybe) sentient robots. It's a clever way to handle an adaptation, getting to play with many locations, characters, and gadgets from the movie without clumsily forcing the plot into video game shape. It even echoes the movie's uncertainty by randomly picking a different handful of key characters to be replicants on each playthrough. I liked it in 1997 and, after years of the game not being sold anywhere, still liked it when a version rebuilt inside ScummVM arrived on GOG in 2019. You should play that version, not this new one.
[…]
But this is an epic failure:
[…]
It even ruins one of the game's best moments: vibing on Ray's balcony listening to nine minutes of the Blade Runner Blues. The song will randomly cut off after sound effects like the thunder or siren, and the scene is missing the blaring adverts for a new life on the off-world colonies (it's the chance to begin again in a golden land of opportunity and adventure, don't you know?). I've tried several times and it always gets cut off at some point.
[…]
I agree with Alice O'Connor, this release is all about bringing an old game from an endangered platform into the new platforms.
[…]
If ScummVM hadn't added support for Blade Runner, and if GOG hadn't re-released the game, I would welcome the release of an ugly remaster with joy and a sidenote of sadness. But that version does exist, and it's better. Nightdive reportedly couldn't build on ScummVM's work because the open-source license requirements wouldn't fly with their plans for console releases, and consoles do seem the main reason for this to exist at all. I'm glad consoleers will get to see this game in some form, but on PC it's near-pointless.
[…]
It is wonderful that a whole new audience will experience the game and, more than likely, (re-) watch the excellent film —— Vale maestro Papathanassiou —— and, maybe, even read the original book by PKD (which I highly recommend).
low rated
avatar
Linko64: It's wrong either way, as too is the silence.
avatar
MarkoH01: If I am not mistaken "silence" is simply GOGs favorite policy when it comes to the question on how to handle their unsatisfied customer base. I have absolutely no idea why they still follow this policy since they have been told already by (at least) 6 persons from said customer base that silence policy is never working ... maybe they just did not believe them - maybe they weren't even interested for real in what those 6 thought could improve the GOG/customer releations ... it will remain a big mystery to me why the results of two days talks were thrown away completely but we can't understand everything in life I guess.
It seems like a case of asking their user community for feedback and not liking the answers they got. They didn't get the answers they wanted and it ultimately shows how little respect they have for their customer base.
low rated
avatar
Dogmaus: There is a beautiful review that GOG can't delete because it's on Steam:
"You are the thieves who stole the work of the ScummVM group" (I'm quoting).
That further proves why Steam has no integrity.
avatar
Linko64: Normally with deleted review it's to control false revies e.g. ranting with no reference to the direct quality of the product. A chunk of these talk directly of the product, deleting them in err....a odd one. I've not had too much time to play the 'enhanced' edition so can't comment on its quality, but there is clearly a issue with it. Deleting reviews in this case is a a bit reckless
avatar
Dogmaus: Normally accepted reviews on GOG are like I don't like this game because you play a woman and I am a boy; this game is jsw communist propaganda because one character is gay or black. Just random letters like dhdhdhfhfbd. Reviews like this are all over the site and never removed in years.
Thanks for regurgitating Right Wing talking points you heard from propaganda sites instead of actually understanding what they mean.
avatar
Dogmaus: Normally accepted reviews on GOG are like I don't like this game because you play a woman and I am a boy; this game is jsw communist propaganda because one character is gay or black. Just random letters like dhdhdhfhfbd. Reviews like this are all over the site and never removed in years.
avatar
mrkgnao: One of my favourite examples is this list of eight consecutive reviews on the "We Are the Dwarves" game page (see image). Note how the reviews are all five stars, all by users with a tiny number of games and reviews, all by users with highly convincing user names, and all posted within a period of five days in April 2019.

I wonder why the developers of the game didn't contact GOG to delete these reviews.
Ahh... selection bias. I just checked the "most helpful" reviews of that game and they vary between 1 to 4 stars of varying dates.
Post edited June 30, 2022 by Krogan32
avatar
Krogan32: That further proves why Steam has no integrity.
Because they don't censor reviews???

avatar
Krogan32: Ahh... selection bias. I just checked the "most helpful" reviews of that game and they vary between 1 to 4 stars of varying dates.
Well they can't all be fake, thankfully