And I'm 5'8, I'm not little.

Confused yeah, I'll cop to that.

The party is called AfD ("Alternative für Deutschland" - "Alternative for Germany"), not AdP.
And while it's true AfD did exceptionally well in East Germany, they also got substantial results in many West German areas (somewhat above 12% in the southern states of Bavaria and Baden-Würtemberg).
The whole "The stupid Easterners haven't got a clue about democracy, never learned it" argument is a diversion pushed by the German establishment which doesn't want to admit how badly they screwed up in supporting Merkel's open borders policy (which is the only reason why AfD - which was close to imploding in mid-2015 - still exists and did comparatively well at the elections).

The whole censorship system needs to be thrown into the garbage. Only then, will Germans be able to have the same freedom when it comes to indulging in entertainment as most people in the world.

*shrug* politicians saying stupid things in parliament, I think we can survive that :)
its not like this never happened before :p

Probably, but it still seems like wasting your vote if you vote for a party you do not identify with and whose slogans you will have to endure then for four years just in order to punish another party. It would probably be better to look for a more decent alternative if available. In the end I'm just not very keen on having to see the new party in the headlines for the coming years.

If you stand for alt-right, then maybe start by not making them sound so crazy? Relax!
You don't have to threaten people :)

I don't know any Baywatchformers, so I have to look into that, but if it's like "the first scene you see is someone manipulating the world with the power of his mind (also: see most games as they are thus unimmersive and thus shitty)", no I don't believe that's true. But the difference here is: I don't know, maybe they are true.
I don't look down on anybody on this planet - Even the most gruesome mass murderers. Everybody is the product of his genes and his upbringing so why hold something you don't like against them. Looking down means it actually irks me right? So no, I don't have time for that shit and to play world ethics police every freaking day. To varying degree I sort people as "can interact" and "can not interact" and a mass murderer would be in the far right of the second category. No time to fanatically speak about how the mass murderer is a mass murderer and that I find that bad. That would be like those feminazis who don't buy core games with unsexy female protagonists yet they all scream they should be made. If you call that looking down, then yes.

To address Cloud... that's all well and good until you learn that we all live in a simulation in which the game master can spawn anything at any point. But to piss you off, he's not spawning Cloud.
I know that one is not to take what people say word for word (one of the biggest pitfalls in my life), because when they say "It is" it's usually "I believe", so no hard feelings there. But when you're actually saying the scientific word "atheist", it's definition is like that, and that is a bit bold, as real scientists _always_ say "It's unlikely.." to soften their conclusions, because they, most of all, can sum up the mind to understand that _everything_ not exactly specified, given time and space, can change. Just because you can't see it, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I hate fantasy and I can't believe I just said that :D But logical at the same time, every man fears (=hates) the unknown. Spock would raise an eyebrow now.

But for the record I don't believe that Garbriel told Mohammed to kill everybody who does not believe it.
I leave you with that logic bomb just like Kirk did with that robot in that episode.
Happy exploding.

You were right, they are gassing the whole banking system as we speak.

I hope you are not referring to the fact that banks would rather have no cash money: but only digital, like in the sf movies were cash is tranfered digitally(numbers only, no real cash you can hold)

So if you have been a 'bad' boy according to some people they can block your digital income, since there is no cash, physical money, they have you were they want you.

With all real cash gone and also millions of people jobless, and common labour replaced by advanced machines you will have a Terminator like future with a EU Skynet.... not a very pleasant view of the future.

Yes. I would be perfectly OK with todays lifestyle of e.g. tapping location services for when you want to go to the nearest, I don't know, specialized doctor for some illness your insurance should not find out about, but the problem is: Every location service (google and so on) have _NO_ product for paying customers who want to have guarenteed that they don't share your data.
That is something which should be enforced by politicians (they make rules), but so far, nothing. I think most are either incompetent, fear backlash, for are supported by cases full of money graciously left by lobbyists.
No, I was joking about Jew history and how they are always got forced into the money business and the relation to world war 2, but your future is one we all sure will have one day. Heck, wageslaves are real today!

Ah, the money business, yes i know all about it, yes despite all bad things that happend to them most of them are still pretty wealthy.
As for the grim future: yes we will have that sooner then we thik cause now EU (Brussels) is full steam ahead globalazing Europe cause now the momentum is there, they forget the fact that some 'unwanted' parties , as they call anything that does not believe in what they believe, have gained a nice amount of seats, same in the netherlands, they are happy they can bow to EU but also forgot they lost seats aswell, and the vvd lost members aswell to fvd, lots of members.
Anyway now with the last incident with the 2 soldiers , regaring bad equipment / ammo the main party VVD is in the spotlights again.....

I forgot who said that. But that quote was very intersting.

60% of germans that voted for AfD voted for them in protest and not because they identify with them.
But nearly 100% of germans that voted for the greens voted them out of deep conviction. I think that is true. You don’t vote for the greens if you don’t identify with them.

I think that was very intersting. The greens have very stable results. But SPD and CDU aren’t that stable. Granted their fan base (sorry dont have an adequate word right now) is bigger.

I think the AfD will vanish just like the pirat party did in a couple of years. The problem will resolve from alone. We don’t have to do anything. They have no concept like SPD right now and people will see this when time comes.

Will Germany finally have coalition government this weekend, or will new elections be required?

we actually wont know this weekend for sure - as even if they reach a final agreement in the negociations there will be a vote of all the ~440000 members of the SPD if they want to accept the terms or prefer reelections