It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
Themken: Yes, certainly it depends but you can do smaller resolution on a bigger screen, not the other way around.
avatar
Lexor: It's a matter of proportion, not resolution. Some games do not depend on resolution and display the same view in many resolutions (of the same proportions) - view is just less or more detailed. Change of display proportion creates much more visible difference.

EDIT: Found a gif to illustrate why 16:9 is better: http://hs2.abload.de/img/sc2_fov36k6.gif
Which is an illusion as you could draw a 4:3 box around the gif and then shrink the image and put black bars above and below for the widescreen ratios.

The merging of computer monitors and consumer TVs sucked. A shit refresh rate and crap screen ratio was worse for gaming.
avatar
Spectre: Which is an illusion as you could draw a 4:3 box around the gif and then shrink the image and put black bars above and below for the widescreen ratios.
No, it's not illusion for the most games. For example, I played Diablo III on 4:3 monitor but this game has special mode to have these black bars above and below, but for the other games such scaling presented in this gif is very true and used by default.

Another example of CS:GO - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCCwgUrBpI0 - you see more on both sides in 16:9 mode - vertically it's the same.
Post edited April 17, 2018 by Lexor
avatar
Spectre: Which is an illusion as you could draw a 4:3 box around the gif and then shrink the image and put black bars above and below for the widescreen ratios.
avatar
Lexor: No, it's not illusion for the most games. For example, I played Diablo III on 4:3 monitor but this game has special mode to have these black bars above and below, but for the other games such scaling presented in this gif is very true and used by default.
It is an illusion as you could shrink or enlarge the image with mods and in a game like that you would want to see above and below as much as from either side.
avatar
Spectre: It is an illusion as you could shrink or enlarge the image with mods
That's only possible IF there are mods for the game - most of the games have NO mods.
Also: not every game publisher accept such game modifications (for example: Blizzard is very strict on what is / isn't allowed).

16:9 format monitors allow all this without any 3rd party mods and are more universal for everyday use.

avatar
Spectre: in a game like that you would want to see above and below as much as from either side
The thing is:16:10 does not give you vertical advantage in most games - in most games you vertically see the same as in 16:9.
Post edited April 17, 2018 by Lexor
avatar
OldFatGuy: Ugh.. just hooked up my new widescreen monitor... I guess it takes getting used to. I definitely don't like playing Fallout 4 and seeing the desktop off to the right of where I'm playing. It's distracting.. and ugly..

May not be willing to put in the time to get used to it either. I just don't much like it. Obviously YMMV. LOL it's time like this I'm glad I have a son, two nephews, and a niece who all use puters. One of them will be happy to take this monster.

LOL even my browser leaves black areas of screen on both sides. And if you force it to take up the whole screen it streeeeeetches and looks U.G.L.Y.
Uhhh... I don't think you have it set up right. None of that should be happening.
Oh no, black bars. Why do folks get their knickers in a twist about having a game in its native resolution? Next time, I recommend researching a monitor that suits your needs before folding to a trend.
avatar
GR00T: (For comparison, I have a 1920x1200 monitor and Fallout 4 looks awesome on it).
avatar
Themken: I think that is the perfect resolution for a monitor. Pity the industry disagrees and charge twice as much as for a 1920x1080 :-(
May I ask why you consider better than the standard 1080p?
avatar
Themken: I think that is the perfect resolution for a monitor. Pity the industry disagrees and charge twice as much as for a 1920x1080 :-(
avatar
MadalinStroe: May I ask why you consider better than the standard 1080p?
Much better for work and some games. No matter what aspect ratio you have, it is bad for some games. I see no problem with having slim black bars in some games and rather that than three differnt monitors, one for each aspect ratio. Sure the wide formats are just perfect for some games and film but those would show just fine on a higher screen too if I set up the screen's settings correctly. Another solution would naturally be to have a much bigger screen, many of which take more space, where there are enough pixels vertically anyway. Problem there is cost; more expensive monitor + more space (a bigger flat might set you back A LOT) and a much more expensive graphics card to push so much more pixels.
avatar
MadalinStroe: May I ask why you consider better than the standard 1080p?
For me 16:10 is only better if you are using monitor mostly for work and you need space but you can't afford anything better than "standard" 16:9 (like 2560 x 1440).

In any other situation 16:9 is better as it is currently more versatile format.
Post edited April 17, 2018 by Lexor
I was talking about a 3660 (or whatever) X 1440. 30 something something.. .real wide. I tried every resolution available on Fallout 4 and ALL resulted in large parts of the screen not being used. Again, I _could_ scale it take up the whole page, but then it just looks awful (stretched).

I think maybe these monitors are more for productivity than gaming. So it was my bad for buying it.
avatar
OldFatGuy: I was talking about a 3660 (or whatever) X 1440. 30 something something.. .real wide. I tried every resolution available on Fallout 4 and ALL resulted in large parts of the screen not being used. Again, I _could_ scale it take up the whole page, but then it just looks awful (stretched).

I think maybe these monitors are more for productivity than gaming. So it was my bad for buying it.
Just some whacky out-of-the-box thinking: Have your tried researching the actual native resolution of your monitor (which usually doesn't include "or whatever" in parantheses) and then setting/modding the games to the correct resolution?
avatar
Spectre: Which is an illusion as you could draw a 4:3 box around the gif and then shrink the image and put black bars above and below for the widescreen ratios.
avatar
Lexor: No, it's not illusion for the most games. For example, I played Diablo III on 4:3 monitor but this game has special mode to have these black bars above and below, but for the other games such scaling presented in this gif is very true and used by default.

Another example of CS:GO - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCCwgUrBpI0 - you see more on both sides in 16:9 mode - vertically it's the same.
That's only because certain games choose to screw over certain ratios.They could let you have the same FOV but didn't,unlike a video where the ratio is set e.g silly conan making fun of people with 4:3 here except most modern TVs let you choose either.

The problem is worse when you get into multiple monitor territory and the variety of ways you can configure them or can't in the case of idiot games like cs:go buy more loot.
Post edited April 18, 2018 by Spectre
avatar
Spectre: That's only because certain games choose to screw over certain ratios.
Yes, that's true. 16:9 is the current standard one, 16:10 is sometimes natively supported, sometimes not. And if not, then people will probably have a little different experience (most probably worse one).
avatar
OldFatGuy: I was talking about a 3660 (or whatever) X 1440. 30 something something.. .real wide. I tried every resolution available on Fallout 4 and ALL resulted in large parts of the screen not being used. Again, I _could_ scale it take up the whole page, but then it just looks awful (stretched).

I think maybe these monitors are more for productivity than gaming. So it was my bad for buying it.
avatar
Randalator: Just some whacky out-of-the-box thinking: Have your tried researching the actual native resolution of your monitor (which usually doesn't include "or whatever" in parantheses) and then setting/modding the games to the correct resolution?
I don't know if you're being a smartass or are genuinely confused but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. The native resolution is what I said above, I was typing from memory but it is a well known, ultra wide resolution. As I just looked it up it's 3440X1440. And as I said above I tried every resolution in Fallout 4 and got the result I posted above.
These are much better suited to productivity than gaming. At least at the moment. And I wish I hadn't bought it but live and learn.
avatar
OldFatGuy: Ugh.. just hooked up my new widescreen monitor... I guess it takes getting used to. I definitely don't like playing Fallout 4 and seeing the desktop off to the right of where I'm playing. It's distracting.. and ugly..

May not be willing to put in the time to get used to it either. I just don't much like it. Obviously YMMV. LOL it's time like this I'm glad I have a son, two nephews, and a niece who all use puters. One of them will be happy to take this monster.

LOL even my browser leaves black areas of screen on both sides. And if you force it to take up the whole screen it streeeeeetches and looks U.G.L.Y.
avatar
SirPrimalform: Uhhh... I don't think you have it set up right. None of that should be happening.
It's set up right.
Post edited April 18, 2018 by OldFatGuy
avatar
Randalator: Just some whacky out-of-the-box thinking: Have your tried researching the actual native resolution of your monitor (which usually doesn't include "or whatever" in parantheses) and then setting/modding the games to the correct resolution?
avatar
OldFatGuy: I don't know if you're being a smartass or are genuinely confused but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. The native resolution is what I said above, I was typing from memory but it is a well known, ultra wide resolution. As I just looked it up it's 3440X1440. And as I said above I tried every resolution in Fallout 4 and got the result I posted above.
These are much better suited to productivity than gaming. At least at the moment. And I wish I hadn't bought it but live and learn.
avatar
SirPrimalform: Uhhh... I don't think you have it set up right. None of that should be happening.
avatar
OldFatGuy: It's set up right.
Donm't give up on it. Quite a lot of new games work fine on it, just running Far Cry 5 through my 3440x1440, stunningly good. Fallout 4 is good through it. The reason you get the black bars and problems is not the monitor, its the developers. Then lock height to width, so height is a percentage of width. Even if you set the res correctly, you get a messed up menu system. Here is what I had for F4 when I played through:
Edit Fallout4Prefs.ini
Set
iSize W=3440
iSize H=1440

You will need this mod - otherwise the menus are all off the screen:
https://www.nexusmods.com/fallout4/mods/274

And FlawlessWidescreen from:
https://www.flawlesswidescreen.org/

Instructions are in the mod, pretty easy, Flawless widescreen works on other games as well.

With that tweak F4 works fine on widescreen.