It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Community
General discussionDoes this forum seem a bit outdated?(47 posts)(47 posts)
(47 posts)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
This is my favourite topic
Posted February 16, 2016
Aesthetically-wise I think the forums are fine as they are. Always found what I needed.
Posted February 16, 2016
nah totally fine for me. I kinda like the "oldschool" vibe and don't require anymore subforums or stuff like that.
Posted February 16, 2016
avatar
Shamy25: snip
GoG is wild, GoG is chaos, GoG is love!!! :-)
Posted February 16, 2016
It's fine for me except for some minor things like not supporting animated gifs in avatar,but nothing major
Posted February 16, 2016
avatar
RottenRotz: It's fine for me except for some minor things like not supporting animated gifs in avatar,but nothing major
Actually, I would prefer the forum not to support animated gifs as avatars; they are an annoying distraction, and don't serve any real purpose.
Posted February 16, 2016
high rated
avatar
TT_TT_TT_TT: nah totally fine for me. I kinda like the "oldschool" vibe and don't require anymore subforums or stuff like that.
And I see that the issues that your username change introduced are still not solved...
Posted February 16, 2016
avatar
RottenRotz: It's fine for me except for some minor things like not supporting animated gifs in avatar,but nothing major
avatar
dtgreene: Actually, I would prefer the forum not to support animated gifs as avatars; they are an annoying distraction, and don't serve any real purpose.
your choice ;)
Posted February 16, 2016
avatar
TT_TT_TT_TT: nah totally fine for me. I kinda like the "oldschool" vibe and don't require anymore subforums or stuff like that.
avatar
HypersomniacLive: And I see that the issues that your username change introduced are still not solved...
sadly not ^^ - but got a pm from staff a bit back that they are really looking into it (without contacting them first again) so ya we may prevail in the end ;)
Posted February 16, 2016
A "bit"?
Posted February 16, 2016
avatar
Cyraxpt: A "bit"?
Yes.
Posted February 16, 2016
avatar
Cyraxpt: A "bit"?
Yes a bit.

We did do the hat.
And the nose.

But she has got a wart!
Posted February 16, 2016
avatar
Cyraxpt: A "bit"?
avatar
tinyE: Yes a bit.

We did do the hat.
And the nose.

But she has got a wart!
If she weighs the same as a duck, then she's made of wood. And therefore a witch. Solid logic that can't be denied. The logic is simply undeniable.
Posted February 16, 2016
avatar
Cyraxpt: A "bit"?
avatar
tinyE: Yes a bit.

We did do the hat.
And the nose.

But she has got a wart!
https://media.giphy.com/media/Ow59c0pwTPruU/giphy.gif
Posted February 16, 2016
avatar
tinyE: Yes a bit.

We did do the hat.
And the nose.

But she has got a wart!
avatar
paladin181: If she weighs the same as a duck, then she's made of wood. And therefore a witch. Solid logic that can't be denied. The logic is simply undeniable.
That whole scene was based on Aristotelian Deduction which used to be the standard scientific method for people. XD

When I covered it in a philosophy course in college the professor made us watch that scene.
Posted February 16, 2016
We like it this way, stranger.

*spits chewing tobacco*

Now git!
Pages:
1
2
3
4
This is my favourite topic
Community
General discussionDoes this forum seem a bit outdated?(47 posts)(47 posts)
(47 posts)