Darvond: No. But rather than leaving it at such a simple blunt statement, I'll explain.
Think of the people who are claimant to such sightings:
1) Alone, no witnesses to actually back their claims.
2) In a farce of circumstance, somehow unaware of strange circumstances.
3) Always somehow end up somewhere quite near to where they had been "abducted" from, instead of appearing on the Kinzua Sky Walk, several thousands of kilometers from where they should be.
You are talking about UFO sightings, which is not the same thing as aliens travelling interstellar distances. UFO lore makes a strong connection between the two, but in reality, those two are separate issues.
If we talk about UFO sightings, there are several credible cases with multiple witnesses and recorded instrument data.
Belgian triangle wave, Japan Airlines flight 1628, Finnair flight AY 915, and so on.
Of course those are most likely some military technology/incidents that has never been made public by any military forces in the world.
PixelBoy: Even if most alien races wouldn't bother, and would rather stay at home playing good old video games, even if there's one race that takes the challenge, we should see it. Because we don't, then it's very likely that there simply isn't anyone out there to try anything like that.
Mr.Mumbles: Considering how vast the universe is and how relatively little we actually know about our very own galaxy it's impossible that anyone could say in any absolute way that we are the only intelligent species in existence.
That wasn't the question. We may not be the most intelligent thing on this planet, but that's almost impossible to measure because things with bigger brains, like dolphins, couldn't physically do the things that we do, like travel in space.
Also, I was referring to this galaxy alone, and the theory about populating the galaxy in a very short (cosmic) timeframe.
There can be some super intelligent beings 300 galaxies further away from us, but it would be even less probable that those beings would ever get here. Even if they started some massive space program, there would be those other 299 galaxies between us, so it's unlikely that they would ever get here. And that is assuming that out of all directions they would start expanding towards our galaxy, and not other galaxies.
If life is as plentiful as, for instance, the Drake equation speculates, then there should be thousands or millions of intelligent civilizations in this galaxy alone.
If such numbers were even remotely true, we would be seeing at least subjects to speculation all the time, but we don't. The only thing we have so far is the "Wow signal", which most likely was an unexplained instrumentation malfunction.
PixelBoy: And that brings us back to the Fermi paradox. If there are some aliens who are millions of years ahead of us in their technology, then why haven't they already spread out all over the galaxy?
neumi5694: How is not knowing a reason for a action or non-action a paradox?
We can not assume that we understand how another life form thinks. But let's just assume they think like we do. That would mean they never got interstellar travel working, because they got themselves extinct long before that.
True, but whether they don't exist, or they are just simply too lazy to travel is irrelevant, as the original question was, are they here. In both cases, they would not be here.
And again, if there's any truth to that Drake stuff, there should be at least some signs of alien civilizations some place. Even if 99% of them would never leave their planet, or send out any intentional or unintentional signal, just that remaining 1% would be enough to prove their existence.
Because no such proof exists, even though based on many theories it should, it creates the said paradox.
And the argument of us being the only moderately intelligent beings, at least in this galaxy, becomes more probable.
We could go further into the discussion about how each and every theory about extraterrestrial life has turned out to be false so far. Some thought there was life on the Moon, there wasn't. Some thought there were channels on Mars, there weren't. Some thought Venus was a blue planet with water and life, it isn't. Some thought there were habitable moons in the outer solar system, there aren't. Some thought aliens might be broadcasting radio signals from exoplanets, so far they haven't.
So every time some speculative source of life has been scientifically studied, it has turned out to be untrue. And that has pushed our current hopes for finding life even more speculative, like believing that ʻOumuamua was an artificially constructed object.