Grargar: In essence, either GOG is rejecting the games as unfit for their service, or because of the pricing.
tfishell: I imagine
pricing for most of the older games. Shame as it's only a $1 difference - 5.99 vs. 6.99.
Funny how often people have complained on GOG that some classic games aren't even worth $5.99. Correct or not, that was something I read many times regarding one of the last Tommo games to be released on GOG, Sword of the Samurai.
So, who should we be laying the blame on? Night Dive for increasing their base price refusing to make an exception for GOG because they want the same price on all platforms (sound familiar? Yeah, that was recently returned Nordic's position)? Or GOG for not making a $1 exception so they can continue to release classic Microprose titles?
ggf162: Is pricing really such a problem though? I mean look at the Pixelunk games;
and [url=http://www.gog.com/game/pixeljunk_monsters_hd]$7.99 for Shooter and Monsters, respectively.
GOG has been historically tight on "classic" game pricing. They've been willing to treat newer indie game differently...