It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
So basically the D&D universe does not have as linear a lore compared to Warcraft and Tolkien and I think the Warhammer universe?
I was going to start with Pool of Radiance.
avatar
Elmofongo: So basically the D&D universe does not have as linear a lore compared to Warcraft and Tolkien and I think the Warhammer universe?
Actually, $SETTING does have a linear core and is a complete universe. However, $SETTING is only one of the various settings that have been released for Dungeons and Dragons; there are other settings, and they are different.

Possible values for $SETTING, as used in computer games:
Forgotten Realms
Dragonlance
Dark Sun
Ravenloft
Spelljammer (but not on gog.com)
Planescape
Greyhawk (Temple of Elemental Evil)

As used in official D&D supplements, but not in any computer games, to my knowledge:
Eberron (would be interesting to see a cRPG set here)
possibly others
avatar
Elmofongo: So basically the D&D universe does not have as linear a lore compared to Warcraft and Tolkien and I think the Warhammer universe?
avatar
dtgreene: Actually, $SETTING does have a linear core and is a complete universe. However, $SETTING is only one of the various settings that have been released for Dungeons and Dragons; there are other settings, and they are different.

Possible values for $SETTING, as used in computer games:
Forgotten Realms
Dragonlance
Dark Sun
Ravenloft
Spelljammer (but not on gog.com)
Planescape
Greyhawk (Temple of Elemental Evil)

As used in official D&D supplements, but not in any computer games, to my knowledge:
Eberron (would be interesting to see a cRPG set here)
possibly others
Why do you call settings like "$Settings?"

Whats with the dollar symbol?
avatar
tamablenebula: The Gold Box games are 1e AD&D.
avatar
dtgreene: Not quite true.

The Gold Box games (Collection 2 and the Krynn series) are actually based on *1st* edition, complete with things like the 1st edition ranger (which gets d8 hit dice and both druid and magic user spells), the strange 1e Heal spell (heals all but 1d4 hit points), and the sexist rule about female strength (female characters have a lower strength cap than male characters, and they get nothing in return to balance the penalty). No game to my knowledge implements the 1e Druid or Bard, however. (The 1e Bard would have been interesting to see in a computer game, especially since it is very different from the Bards of later editions.)

The Dark Sun games, while 2e based, are the only games (to my knowledge) to implement the psionics rules. They are also the only ones to implement double dual classing.
Sigh... I really need to fact-check better next time.
avatar
dtgreene: As used in official D&D supplements, but not in any computer games, to my knowledge:
Eberron (would be interesting to see a cRPG set here)
Dragonshard takes place in Eberron.
Post edited December 11, 2015 by Grargar
If you like Baldur's Gate then start with it. Afterwards check out what you want.
Either BG2 if you want to continue, Pool of Radiance (the old one, everything turn-based) or Eye of the Beholder (first person real-time action game) if you want a change.
avatar
Elmofongo: Why do you call settings like "$Settings?"

Whats with the dollar symbol?
In Linux (and probably other UNIX-based OS), variables names always start with a '$'. Most of them are full uppercase by convention.

So it means here that the variable named "$SETTING" can take any of the values listed and the sentence will stay true.
Post edited December 11, 2015 by vv221
avatar
Elmofongo: Why do you call settings like "$Settings?"

Whats with the dollar symbol?
avatar
vv221: In Linux (and probably other UNIX-based OS), variables names always start with a '$'. Most of them are full uppercase by convention.

So it means here that the variable named "$SETTING" can take any of the values listed and the sentence will stay true.
Technically, it is the shell that has this convention.

Perl also uses this convention for variable names.
avatar
dtgreene: Greyhawk (Temple of Elemental Evil)
Whaat? I always thought ToEE was set in Faerun because in the PC version you select a Faerun deity when you create a cleric.
Post edited December 11, 2015 by Green_Hilltop
avatar
Green_Hilltop: Whaat? I always thought ToEE was set in Faerun because in the PC version you select a Faerun deity when you create a cleric.
Yes, it's set in Greyhawk. I'm not sure who are the Faerun deities you are talking about. Corellon Larethian? Moradin? Those also exist in Greyhawk.
Post edited December 11, 2015 by Grargar
avatar
Grargar: 3.0
Icewind Dale 2
Neverwinter Nights

3.5
Neverwinter Nights 2
Temple of Elemental Evil

The rest are either 2nd Edition or not trying to adapt the DND rules (Demon Stone and Dragonshard).
avatar
dtgreene: Not quite true.

The Gold Box games (Collection 2 and the Krynn series) are actually based on *1st* edition, complete with things like the 1st edition ranger (which gets d8 hit dice and both druid and magic user spells), the strange 1e Heal spell (heals all but 1d4 hit points), and the sexist rule about female strength (female characters have a lower strength cap than male characters, and they get nothing in return to balance the penalty). No game to my knowledge implements the 1e Druid or Bard, however. (The 1e Bard would have been interesting to see in a computer game, especially since it is very different from the Bards of later editions.)

The Dark Sun games, while 2e based, are the only games (to my knowledge) to implement the psionics rules. They are also the only ones to implement double dual classing.
Also, <i>Stronghold</i> uses the D&D ruleset, not AD&D. Of course, it's not the only one, most of the games set in Mystara do too. As for psionics, they're in the PSP game, Dungeons & Dragons Tatctics, as well.
avatar
Green_Hilltop: Whaat? I always thought ToEE was set in Faerun because in the PC version you select a Faerun deity when you create a cleric.
avatar
Grargar: Yes, it's set in Greyhawk. I'm not sure who are the Faerun deities you are talking about. Corellon Larethian? Moradin? Those also exist in Greyhawk.
Yes, I was thinking of Corellon specifically, however it looks like I was mistaken since I don't think I ever realized it was set on Greyhawk (and it's not mentioned in the manual, right?), due to my thinking it would be set in FR like all the other modern DnD games were coupled with Corellon being one of the selectable deities and not knowing much about the FR pantheon at the time. Also I felt that you had more gods from Faerun there, like Helm, but now I see it's just Corellon and Moradin after all (unless any of the others exist on Faerun as well). ...it also explains why I thought Pelor was one of FR gods, haha!

Hm, now that I've seen the fan updates again, I'm thinking - how much better is the base campaign if you install the fan updates? Does the base game become more fun?
Post edited December 11, 2015 by Green_Hilltop
As said by others, for the old games, within a certain D&D Universe you should stick to the sequence of the titles if they form a "chain" within that universe like the Pool of Radiance Series, or the Dragonlance Titles... For nostalgic reasons you could also stick, within each of the D&D Realms, to the sequence of the time they where published ;)

What I may add, and why I post here - [url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DragonStrike_(video_game)]DragonStrike[/url] - it is a game that is AFAIK not available in the stores I am aware of as a digital download - but this SSI-Title is a game that any player of the Dragonlance titles should be aware of ;) And something you may keep in mind (to look out for) if you enjoy the Krynn Titles :D
Post edited December 11, 2015 by Sha_n_Dra
avatar
qwixter: I was going to start with Pool of Radiance.
+1 It's the earliest one despite being in the 2nd collection.
avatar
vv221: In Linux (and probably other UNIX-based OS), variables names always start with a '$'. Most of them are full uppercase by convention.

So it means here that the variable named "$SETTING" can take any of the values listed and the sentence will stay true.
avatar
dtgreene: Technically, it is the shell that has this convention.

Perl also uses this convention for variable names.
Right, that was a quick shortcut, I’m spending a bit too much time coding in shell lately ;)