It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
More people will be moving over to Linux with the windows 10 change and it's never ending nonsense.
I'd certainly be down for a Linux version. But then i was prompting CD Projekt RED to look at DX12 compatibility for Windows 7 (it has been done on some games already) in the Cyberpunk thread for that.

Basically the only way i will pay for Cyberpunk is on a non Windows 10 version. If not then fine i'll pass it by.
avatar
OldOldGamer: Windows 10 is not better, but it is for gaming. Full stop.

Linux does everything and behind.
Perhaps too much.

Windows allow you to install a program, HW drivers and run these.

I see the "switch to Linux so superior system", a bit like the global warming theories that completely forgot that the south hemisphere is getting colder or,as minimum, not any hotter.
avatar
rojimboo: Ah, a science denialist. Figures. No sane argument can be made, that would be enough to convince you even a little bit about facts.

Should I even bother? I guess maybe in case other people are interested or reading this.

avatar
OldOldGamer: Windows 10 is not better, but it is for gaming. Full stop.
avatar
rojimboo: I don't actually disagree with this too much. I would say it's 'barely' better, a tiny bit better, only slightly better. And that's solely because some of the most popular games are competitive multiplayer games with anti-cheat that has not been ported to Linux. This causing some problems, like either not getting the game to work, or getting it to work, but possibly getting banned for the workaround implemented.

But another reason why Windows is better, is simply because of a lack of native ports for Linux - it's not because Windows is inherently better, like, at all. If these were ported to Linux natively, like for instance XCOM 2, chances are the game would not only run at least as good as the Windows counterpart, it might even surpass it due to lower overhead and resource utilisation by the OS. This is at least what I noticed with that particular game. Nevermind that usually games are ported straight into Vulkan when making native Linux ports, and thus does not use DirectX, usually for the better.

Linux does everything and behind.
Perhaps too much.
avatar
rojimboo: Not sure what you mean by this, maybe something lost in translation.

Yes, Linux does everything pretty much that Windows does. There are some specific proprietary software or drivers that are only on Windows, and that might break a lot or a little when using Linux, no doubt about that. But these are largely very niche, and specialised, like some multimedia recording/editing stuff, I think?

For the rest, stuff just works, and you can make it work even better. For instance, I have a pretty special headphone amplifier / sound card in my rig. On Windows, I went through a nightmare to enable its amplifier function (from 32 ohms to 64-300 ohms). Because the drivers didn't exist for modern OS, Windows 10. It took me probably a week or more of dedicated troubleshooting and scouring of the interweb, and harassing the company tech support to get it done.

On Ubuntu/Manjaro/probably any linux distro? Works straight out of the box, just need to go into alsamixer sound settings and set the amplifier/resistance setting.

Mind. Blown.

Windows allow you to install a program, HW drivers and run these.
avatar
rojimboo: And linux doesn't? How easy is it to update/upgrade software and drivers in linux compared to windows? In windows, can you use one command or press a button to do it all? I think not.

Anyways, we can discuss linux desktop vs windows all day long, I don't mind.

Shame we can't discuss anthropogenic climate change.
The novel that "Linux just works" is a pure lie.
1. Many products get released only for Windows. Unfortunate. But a cold fact. Wine is a nice bonus but: doesn't just work.
2. There are never-ending dependency issues. Often even within the same distro.
3. There are so many distros, incompatible between them, is is a brutal pain to port SW across (again, as dependencies are a question mark).
3. Should the above being false, the flatpak technology would not being developed and being looked a blessing
4. A lot of HW needs one or two Kernel releases to get finally supported. Often initially sub-par to Windows.
5. A number of infinite quirks pester you if your desktop sports exotic keyboards/mouses/monitor conf or other devices.

So no. Linux doesn't "just work".
I like Linux a lot.
I developed drivers on Linux as a professional.
As of today. As Linux is. Relative to gaming: give me Windows every day.

[Modded by Bookwyrm627: Please refrain from the social issues fighting.]
Post edited March 13, 2020 by Bookwyrm627
Regarding Linux here below - I think you ignored and brushed aside a lot of what I said. But that's ok. I'll just reply to your nicely numbered points.

As the novel that "Linux just works" is a pure lie.
Many products:
1. Get released only for Windows.
Hm. This doesn't automatically disqualify the statement that 'Linux just works'. How much of the stuff in Linux repos is open source stuff that was officially only released for Windows? I would imagine a hell of a lot.

2. There are never-ending dependency issues. Often even within the same distro.
Of course there are dependencies. And they're handled pretty well, no? You install a package, it has dependencies, depending on the dependencies you might need some other packages and so on. All neatly packaged. Hell, Windows has dependencies too, except you're left with an obscure error message when the software fails to run, to figure out what's missing.

3. There are so many distros, incompatible between them, is is a brutal pain to port SW across (again, as dependencies are a question mark).
Is Ubuntu incompatible with Kubuntu or Ubuntu Mate? No. Is Manjaro KDE or Mate or any other DE flavour incompatible between each other? No. So there aren't that many distros actually, as we don't count the desktop environment variants as incompatible between each other.

As for what remains, it is partly true - Arch/Manjaro users need some package builds in AUR usually, where as debian based/ubuntu users can use deb packages or ppa's and distro repos and so on.

I do think you're making this into a bigger issue than it actually is.

Stuff becomes available for Arch/Manjaro users very quickly, shortly after deb/ubuntu users I imagine. Rarely is anyone getting paid for that support, yet someone somewhere is maintaining up to date packages for people to build.

Hell, Arch and its flavours, are probably some of the last distros developers are releasing to - yet it's well known Arch/Manjaro can represent the cutting edge in Linux desktop gaming due to having latest versions of kernels/wine/dxvk+plus any other gaming software/drivers.

3. Should the above being false, the flatpak technology would not being developed and being looked a blessing
Fair point, snap and flatpak do make it easier, yet the incompatibility between distros you mention still seems exaggerated across Linux. However, you have more experience and knowledge probably in this area, so I can be easily convinced otherwise.

But from what I've seen, non-ubuntu distros wouldn't be so well supported/updated if what you say was true.

4. A lot of HW needs one or two Kernel releases to get finally supported. Often sub-part to Linux.
Maybe new bleeding edge exotic hardware, that doesn't work as is, that's true I suppose.

For most people, this doesn't even apply, gamers update GPUs and CPUs and accompanying standard PC hardware.

Name something that is on the market accessible to gamers that no linux distro can make run adequately currently? I'm curious.

5. A number of infinite quirks if you got strange setups with your desktop or exotic keyboards/mouses or other devices.
You would be surprised at the open source software that is out there.

You have a flashy blingey RGB mouse/keyboard/peripheral? You think there is no open source drivers/utilities to configure those on Linux? Think again. I think I already mentioned all Razer products work splendidly with openrazer, and if people bothered to look, they would probably find other brands too.

So no. Linux doesn't "just work".
I like Linux a lot.
I developed drivers on Linux as a professional.
As of today. As Linux is. Relative to gaming: give me Windows every day.
Tell you what. Let's play a fun game.

You point to a specific game you have that doesn't run on Linux at all / doesn't run so well on Linux, and if I or others can't prove to you that it's possible to run it as good as or almost as good as in Win10, I will accept that for gaming - everyone should boot Windows10 instead of Linux.

Also, to troubleshoot, name your distro, kernel, gpu, wine, dxvk versions, and what arguments you used to run the game and we'll go from there.

[Modded by Bookwyrm627: Please refrain from the social issues fighting.]
Post edited March 13, 2020 by Bookwyrm627
You don't get the point.

I don't want to spend 1 sec to troubleshoot. Nor making a list of many things that doesn't work properly with Linux (audio volumes inconsistent...)
And, unless you have the magic Linux distro no-one is using, you will find hundreds of posts, just on GOG forum, of people, even with lots of Linux experience, with non-running games.

Good hunting.
Post edited March 12, 2020 by OldOldGamer
low rated
avatar
OldOldGamer: You don't get the point.

I don't want to spend 1 sec to troubleshoot. Nor making a list of many things that doesn't work properly with Linux (audio volumes inconsistent...)
And, unless you have the magic Linux distro no-one is using, you will find hundreds of posts, just on GOG forum, of people, even with lots of Linux experience, with non-running games.

Good hunting.
awww

pawww rojimboo

sadface

no fun games
avatar
nightcraw1er.488: ...
avatar
Lin545: Give a spin of a month for desktop everything like I said using, say, Gentoo or Nixos. Then we can discuss, where Linux is. :-) I just remember myself very well when I used 100% Windows and another period when I dualbooted. Only thing I probably miss is changing RGB lighting on my mouse (good to have but mostly irrelevant.. ).
NixOS +1 !


I’d love something like…

pkgs.fetchFormGog {
login = "mylogin";
password = "password";
game = "cyberpunk";
}
avatar
Lin545: Most of long-term Linux users are against home-pinging software or software which strips them of control from things which they themselves paid for. There is big collision with DRM part of Steam and Linux/FSF mentality, I think in unrealistic case of Steam dropping DRM, there would be some drastical changes in that percentage. I also think that marketshare is not what Valve is actually persuing with its Linux program, but its something very similar to Linux/FSF mentality - free control. Given a chance that MS suits Valve and denies it the right to use parts of Windows in development or runtime, Proton is Valve's lifeguard from take over or milking.
If Linux had some secret gaming power out there pushing that percentage a lot higher then it would be a market force people would pay attention to. It's not, because it doesn't.
avatar
StingingVelvet: If Linux had some secret gaming power out there pushing that percentage a lot higher then it would be a market force people would pay attention to. It's not, because it doesn't.
Does the "not getting in the way" count?
CD Projekt had to call a third-party contractor to get The Witcher 2 Linux "port" done.
GOG still has no Linux build of Galaxy after all these years.

I do not think they have people with the required skills to do a Linux port of Cyberpunk 2077. Nor the will to hire some.

No loss for me, I would not want to play it even if a native Linux version were available.
Post edited April 24, 2021 by vv221
I see I've already thrown my vote in. Given the state of Cyberpunk 2077, I don't actually care about the game, I care about the idea of the following:

CDPR treating Linux to the same level of support as Valve does. Yes, that would be a step up.
An updated version of MojoSetup. Come now, the GOG installer is over a decade out of date.
An alternative to the installer based solution, such as a simple Tar.gz
To include formatting support for actual unicode.

To not hire things like "Scrum Masters", since any material I read on it reads like pure marketing cultism, unlike the Dynamic systems development method, or the Rational Unified Process (Which IBM uses), Kanban. or plain ole DevOps. Heck, I'd even accept Workers' self-management. Just call it Lightweight Timeframe Development, or LTD for short? Scrum just screams I'M A MARKETING "PROFESSIONAL" LOOKING FOR NEW BUZZWORDS TO SWOON OVER!!!
(And it has the displeasure of reminding me of one of the most unprofessional food channels I've ever seen.)
Post edited April 24, 2021 by Darvond
avatar
StingingVelvet: If Linux had some secret gaming power out there pushing that percentage a lot higher then it would be a market force people would pay attention to. It's not, because it doesn't.
So being able to run WIn16 doesn't count, or black box tech games? Or literally running games at higher performance curves than native?
Post edited April 24, 2021 by Darvond
A Linux port would be (would have been) nice, but I am not insisting for one, nor I believe GOG would go for it either. Especially since they haven't made a Linux version of Galaxy yet.

Valve/Steam seems to put quite a bit effort on supporting Linux, but I think it is mainly just to keep it alive as their plan B, so that they can continue their business on Linux if Microsoft really started pushing the Windows ecosystem towards a walled garden using Windows Store, which is clearly what Valve was afraid of and complaining about back when the Windows Store was introduced with Windows 8.

At least the gaming I do in Linux currently (which mainly means playing Team Fortress 2 on Steam Linux, and older Windows games on WINE) seems pretty effortless and e.g. playing TF2 in Linux doesn't really differ at all from playing it on Windows... but I guess the "problem" is that Linux/Windows users like me don't really mind playing also on Windows as well (if we have to), which isn't an incentive for GOG or others to support Linux.

So yeah, I hope for the best for Linux gaming, but I am not demanding or insisting for it from game publishers and stores. Albeit, I admit I've recently become a bit annoyed I have to boot to Windows to run e.g. the Epic Store client, just to check if they have any interesting freebie games I should redeem.
Post edited April 24, 2021 by timppu
Voted as well, but I'm skeptical. Would be nice though.
If they ever wanted to make a Linux version of the game possible, they'd have gone with Vulkan instead of D3D12 in Red Engine 4...

Which is not to say they can't add an additional Vulkan renderer to it now, I just find that very unlikely.
Post edited April 24, 2021 by WinterSnowfall