Posted September 15, 2013
Crosmando: No, but Metacritic has never been reliable, because the people that are bothered to write a review/give a score are by definition motivated beyond that of an average gamer. I myself take games seriously and they are mostly my only hobby, yet I'll be damned if I'm going to give a score to everthing I play on Metacritic.
It's a site for motivated minorities, and the scores always reflect an agenda, either it's THIS IS NEW CITIZEN KANE OF GAMING or it's THIS GAME IS EVIL and rarely an area in-between.
Also there's the reality that many people who rated it may not even have played it, or those who gave it a good score psychologically ward off their own buyer's remorse.
The best way to find the opinions of actual gamers on the game (I mean people who play the game from start to finish) is to frequent dedicated boards on the net.
Totally agree, Metacritic = Metash¡tIt's a site for motivated minorities, and the scores always reflect an agenda, either it's THIS IS NEW CITIZEN KANE OF GAMING or it's THIS GAME IS EVIL and rarely an area in-between.
Also there's the reality that many people who rated it may not even have played it, or those who gave it a good score psychologically ward off their own buyer's remorse.
The best way to find the opinions of actual gamers on the game (I mean people who play the game from start to finish) is to frequent dedicated boards on the net.