A space colony city-builder. Hope they have more luck in KS than in IGG:
Terminus

A licensed sequel for the beat'em up River City Ransom:
River City Ransom: Underground

Action platformer/adventure:
The Fall: dark, story driven exploration in an alien world

And wow, mere hours later, Volgarr the Viking comes out on Humble.

EDIT: Pardon me, the download isn't up on Humble, but that's Humble's side of things, the development is done and the Kickstarter post mentions his hope that speed runs will be up soon.

EDIT 2: It will officially be released on the 12th, Steam on the 13th.

Sandblox: make building blocks out of sand

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1327125291/sandblox-reimagine-sand-play

Colt: hockey stick with "powermetal" technology

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/colthockey/the-colt-engineering-a-better-hockey-stick

Help someone pledge $5000 for mighty no. nine

http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/help-me-design-a-mighty-no-9-character

Now I do think you're trolling me. Yes, it's perfectly okay to charge thousands of dollars for getting to say what the special mission would be. It's not okay to limit access to playing that mission. Eg a 2k FTL backer got to design the crystal race (which is awesome), and now I get to play it. I don't get to play my purple space lynx dream race instead, because I paid tenbux.
Uhm.
Uhm.
Wat.
No one plays games to complete them, not even completionists. Otherwise the only game in the universe would be LaZorra's World (go north to win - north! - you win!) People play games for the experience of interacting with the game's content. The more content there is to potentially enhance the experience, the better. (I don't recommend playing PS:T with Leprechaun Annah.) And you can tell the extra content that guy offers is meant to enhance the experience, because he charges money for it.
No, posters are to be sold separately from the artist's site, price to be set by the (like-minded) artist.

Side note: SwiftKey offers to autocomplete "some" with "Euro-Skeptics".

Neo's Land : A New Beginning - High fantasy MMORPG where the community provides content and has a direct say over the development and state of the game.

So let me tell you about The Banner Saga. The kickstarter campaign featured a $50 tier which they promised would get a backer's family crest immortalized in the actual game, to be selectable by other players. TBS got huge exposure and a megaton of backers, so the devs announced they'll be automating the crest submission process.

Then they announce that no, there would be no submissions. Instead, backers of that tier would get a speshul version of the game with the ability to upload any image to use as their crest, everyone else gets the castrated version.

I pm'd them via kickstarter, complaining and politely suggesting a fucking refund (which I didn't get; I'll try again if I don't get a DRM-free copy of the early access release). And guess what? Turns out they had to renege on the submissions because a not-insignificant number of shitstains who pledged for that tier specifically requested to NOT INCLUDE THEIR FUCKING CREST IN THE FUCKING GAME. And the devs had to reward these shitstains with something for their $50, so they chose to ruin both that tier for other backers (by not letting interested folks submit their content for inclusion) and the base game for everyone (by restricting access to an image upload option).

"Not Found

The requested URL /forum/showthread.php was not found on this server.

Additionally, a 404 Not Found error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request."

On one of comments looks like someone hacked their website lol
I actually dont understand that. Person X pledges at Tier $50 expecting to get x rewards. THEY choose not to take up part of that reward. Why should they get something else??????

A RTS project:
Shadow Heroes: Vengeance In Flames

This is a bad move, Shadowrun Returns is a very flawed and disappointing game, they should be focusing on expanding and enhancing that game. This crap looks like a big gimmick.

They are already working on the next campaign and they keep fixing bugs. Golem Arcana is unlikely to impact Shadowrun Returns development anyway. It's not a PC game and has a pretty simple mobile software component. Also "very flawed and disappointing" is purely your opinion. Enough people think it's a decent game. It may not be perfect, but a lot of people were happy enough with it.

Can't say I'm all that excited by Golem Arcana (because I'm not that much into miniatures board games), but Jordan Weisman did most of his important work in pen and paper and miniatures, and it's natural for him to go back there.

Except that it's not "purely" my opinion, in my fact I'd say it's the general consensus. SRR was built up and hyped as a good RPG and completely fell short of any and all expectations. Completely on-rails linear campaign, fake dialogue choices which all mostly give the same response, terrible tablet interface, broken character system with useless classes and non-implemented skills. I would say that the only people who SAID they liked it are lying/buyer's remorse, or are not average cRPG players.

These people do not deserve any money until they get their act together and prove they can even make a good game. Cause SRR basically revealed HBS to be incompetent.

You'd have to prove that. Metacritic shows mostly positive reviews from both reviewers and users, and other user rating sites also show generally favourable responses.

Only people who use use sites like that are shills