Posted October 08, 2015
FearfulSymmetry
The Tyger
FearfulSymmetry Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Oct 2013
From Netherlands
ddickinson
Battle Sister
ddickinson Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Feb 2014
From United Kingdom
ElTerprise
Registered: May 2011
From Germany
FearfulSymmetry
The Tyger
FearfulSymmetry Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Oct 2013
From Netherlands
Posted October 08, 2015
Pretty good. I went to a very nice production of Richard III yesterday, so that was excellent. :P How are you feeling?
I'm good, just taking it easy this morning. I see your illness hasn't gotten any better? :( *hug*
I'm good, just taking it easy this morning. I see your illness hasn't gotten any better? :( *hug*
ElTerprise
Registered: May 2011
From Germany
ddickinson
Battle Sister
ddickinson Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Feb 2014
From United Kingdom
FearfulSymmetry
The Tyger
FearfulSymmetry Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Oct 2013
From Netherlands
ddickinson
Battle Sister
ddickinson Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Feb 2014
From United Kingdom
FearfulSymmetry
The Tyger
FearfulSymmetry Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Oct 2013
From Netherlands
Posted October 08, 2015
ddickinson: I am glad to hear it.
Another person who likes to burn things? I knew Agent and Owl were a bad influence. :-)
Yes, their actions are unleashing my inner pyromaniac. Don't be overly concerned, though, I tend to be so clumsy it's more likely I'll set myself on fire before causing any serious harm to others. :P Another person who likes to burn things? I knew Agent and Owl were a bad influence. :-)
Well, I'm off for a bit to take a shower. *waves*
ddickinson
Battle Sister
ddickinson Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Feb 2014
From United Kingdom
Posted October 08, 2015
FearfulSymmetry: Yes, their actions are unleashing my inner pyromaniac. Don't be overly concerned, though, I tend to be so clumsy it's more likely I'll set myself on fire before causing any serious harm to others. :P
Well, I'm off for a bit to take a shower. *waves*
*gives Fearful a fire-resistant suit* Well, I'm off for a bit to take a shower. *waves*
I forget, am I supposed to remind you to close the curtains when you take a shower so Endre can't see, or am I supposed to not mention it so he can look with his telescope? :-)
*big hug*
AgentBirdnest
Ja'crispy
AgentBirdnest Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Jan 2011
From United States
Posted October 08, 2015
The chat issues have been acknowledged.... which is somehow not comforting at all to me :-|
toxicTom
Big Daddy
toxicTom Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Feb 2009
From Germany
Tallima
TreasureHunting!
Tallima Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Apr 2010
From United States
Posted October 08, 2015
apehater: yes i think i get it now. well my opinion to the whole inflation vs variable speed of light is heavily influenced by the theoretical side and may include mistakes. and in case it should sound offensive than thats just because i'm not a native english speaker.
although we as mankind have the arrogance to think that we're near the end of the understanding how the universe work, it could very fast turn out that we got almost nothing and most parts of our physics are only applicable under special conditions and only in some parts of what we think is the universe (i'm assuming its not only my opinion). its like 1000 years ago where people most probably discussed about what is outside of the flat earth.
this whole discussions about the universe expands too fast, are almost 100 years old as i recall and its mostly because light spectral analysis from presumably old galaxies deliver results that aren't consistent with the applied theories and assumptions. the applied theory is a mix of classic field theory expanded with quantum theory, statistical physics and general relativity. part of the assumptions is that the universe (matter, energy and empty space inside our universe) has finite volume regarding the corresponding submanifold measure, this ensures that the universe is a closed system with conservation. and the conservation doesn't get along with the new results. its like a puzzle then in which you remove/change parts of the theory or assumptions to make it fit with the new results and then look if the theory stays consistant with other results and what conclusions that new theory delivers, be it that there is a blue drarf in every galaxy outside of our own or that the universe collapse in 5 years after gog starts drm'ing their games or that matter/energy can be faster then light speed relative to the spectator under some conditions.
what i want to say with this is: we're not that far away for a religion still. basic mechanics work on our earth for now, but already the simulation of the moon landing (if it ever happened, i doubt it but thats another topic) had to be modified with delay-differential equations instead of ordinary ones. it may sound funny, but how about regional physics, i think you get what i mean. then all the results would be seen under different view and lead to other conclusions.
i personally don't like both ideas, as the results (light spectral analysis from presumably old galaxies) that lead to the conclusions are totally unreliable, at least for me. how about we're just surrounded by black holes, if the distance is far enough, wouldn't this lead to the same results? and light as boundary for speed of matter/energy is just a cheap workaround to fit newton's mechancs with some results, i wouldn't count too much on that boundary.
Yes! I remember when we visited Pluto and we had the size of it off by a bunch. Every time we actually go somewhere, our numbers are way off. although we as mankind have the arrogance to think that we're near the end of the understanding how the universe work, it could very fast turn out that we got almost nothing and most parts of our physics are only applicable under special conditions and only in some parts of what we think is the universe (i'm assuming its not only my opinion). its like 1000 years ago where people most probably discussed about what is outside of the flat earth.
this whole discussions about the universe expands too fast, are almost 100 years old as i recall and its mostly because light spectral analysis from presumably old galaxies deliver results that aren't consistent with the applied theories and assumptions. the applied theory is a mix of classic field theory expanded with quantum theory, statistical physics and general relativity. part of the assumptions is that the universe (matter, energy and empty space inside our universe) has finite volume regarding the corresponding submanifold measure, this ensures that the universe is a closed system with conservation. and the conservation doesn't get along with the new results. its like a puzzle then in which you remove/change parts of the theory or assumptions to make it fit with the new results and then look if the theory stays consistant with other results and what conclusions that new theory delivers, be it that there is a blue drarf in every galaxy outside of our own or that the universe collapse in 5 years after gog starts drm'ing their games or that matter/energy can be faster then light speed relative to the spectator under some conditions.
what i want to say with this is: we're not that far away for a religion still. basic mechanics work on our earth for now, but already the simulation of the moon landing (if it ever happened, i doubt it but thats another topic) had to be modified with delay-differential equations instead of ordinary ones. it may sound funny, but how about regional physics, i think you get what i mean. then all the results would be seen under different view and lead to other conclusions.
i personally don't like both ideas, as the results (light spectral analysis from presumably old galaxies) that lead to the conclusions are totally unreliable, at least for me. how about we're just surrounded by black holes, if the distance is far enough, wouldn't this lead to the same results? and light as boundary for speed of matter/energy is just a cheap workaround to fit newton's mechancs with some results, i wouldn't count too much on that boundary.
We did the same thing with dark matter. I'm not a big dark matter believer. There's all this mysterious matter all over the place, except here. We just happen to not have any. Or, at least, very little. But just out of our reach and everywhere else, there's tons of it (thousands of times more than we have here).
Or our numbers are screwed up.
I agree with you on the "it's like a religion." I've heard lots of folks say that it's important to know certain facts about the universe, but in reality, we don't know them at all.
The best we can do is study, think, observe, hypothesize, test, and keep trying to figure out this crazy universe the best we can.
ElTerprise
Registered: May 2011
From Germany
Posted October 08, 2015
you mean hug-addicted non-blobs right ? ;)
AgentBirdnest: The chat issues have been acknowledged.... which is somehow not comforting at all to me :-|
Oh no...the top men...pimpmonkey2382.313
You are obsolete. Delete!
pimpmonkey2382.313 Sorry, data for given user is currently unavailable. Please, try again later. View profile View wishlist Start conversation Invite to friends Invite to friends Accept invitation Accept invitation Pending invitation... Unblock chat Registered: Jan 2011
From United States
Posted October 08, 2015
*hugs everyone* :)