Tallima: ...
You should be able to understand roughly the same place I am (physics classes in engineering school, light reading on the side). I like what I saw with the theory, which is grand. But I also am completely surprised that it's not covered in basic science classes when inflation is. Of course, I haven't been in school for quite some time, so it might be taught. But I haven't heard it from the lips of any kids. I only hear about inflation. So much so, that I was never told about the massive holes in the inflation theory that, until recently (due to high-precision of describing the thermal layout of the CMB), were only massive, not rationally suspect.
...
apehater: well thats specialised knowledge, only physicians at the end of their master studies who specializes on astro physics would bother about big bang theories and astro physicians which write their dissertation or habilitation.
but back to the topic, what do you mean with increase in size of the nothing, i read that the universe is a compact submanifold and has finite volume with the corresponding submanifold lebesgue measure? and also do you know stokes theorem and how its used to build a consistent field theory?
I don't know Stokes.
As for inflation and "nothing" increasing in size, the theory of inflation requires the universe to grow much larger than it could if the speed of light was a speed limit. It breaks this barrier by making the nothingness in-between particles increase in size much faster than the speed of light.
E=mc^2 means that energy and mass are related -- one and the same, really. You can manipulate the equation so that you show a change in the amount of energy in a mass due to its velocity. When you push a block, a piece of it turns into energy. When it stops, it converts back into mass. The faster you push it, the more mass turns into energy. But you can't push it faster than the speed of light, because all of its mass will be energy. There will be nothing left.
If you turned on a laser that had its beam go straight up and down and then put it on a spaceship that flew past you on earth, the light would move diagonally to you. /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ whereas the astronaut would see it moving vertically |. You can use this idea in combination with the Pythagorean theorem and the speed limit c to quickly deduce that time must change for this event to happen. When something moves relative to something else, the rate that time passes changes in order to keep the speed limit c from being broken.
But the space between matter is neither energy nor matter. So it does not have to follow this law. It can grow or shrink as much as it wants to (according to Inflation, anyway, which at this point I'm pretty sure is just not a correct theory). So the nothingness between particles in the early universe expanded 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000+ times faster than the speed of light.
The problem with inflation is that if the universe expanded that fast, why is their homogeneity in the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB)? The CMB temperature has been measured to be within ten-thousands of a degree from any one point to another. It's all the same temperature. And that's not possible b/c at the point in the universe's creation, it was too big too soon for those particles to talk very far from each other. So we have a very major problem with inflation.