Posted May 27, 2015
adaliabooks: I wasn't particularly meaning marriage, as that is somewhat under the religions area of influence, I was thinking more of people who refuse rooms or to make cakes because the customer is gay and they claim it is against their religion. If you allow that kind of thing I think it opens the door for all kinds of discrimination. I could basically make up a religion and claim anyone I like is inferior and that I don't have to serve them or treat then equally.
I completely understand, and I fully agree, no one should be treated differently because of who or what they are. I know I have been at the receiving end of this, sometimes in a very unpleasant way, so I can appreciate people treating everyone the same rather than something beneath them. But it's a very grey area. At what point does it become an issue of freedom of religion over principles forced on a faith by a government, something which can be seen as undemocratic? Would the responsibility not be with the church, rather than the government? A government should have no real power to influence religion (within reason), it should lie with the rulers of that faith. For example, if Catholics feel so strongly about same sex couples getting equal treatment in the eyes of god, why not take it up with Vatican City? The Catholic church has always adapted the bible to suit it's needs, so if they were to issue a statement accepting all people no matter who or what they are (something that that faith seems to preach on about but hardly ever acts on), then surly that would negate the argument of people using religion as a shield. But as I said, it's a grey area, and one that the government must interfere in in order to get people the equal rights they deserve. I still think the church needs to take some responsibility in it all, but I do not see that going to happen. So you are completely right.