It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
j0ekerr: In the manner of all good threads, things have diggressed towards post-service efficiency.

Allow me to however go back to my question of your favorite hack&slash games.

The greatest of those is the 2004 Ninja Gaiden, with Dark Souls second with a brilliant mix of H&S and RPG elements.

Out of sheer love for the manga, I would have loved to play Sword of the Berserker, and apparently the game was actually rather good for a licensed game too. Has anyone played the PS2 game?
It's somewhat blasphemous, but I do enjoy Koei's Warriors series (Dynasty Warriors, Samurai Warriors). I know most people consider them mindless rubbish but I find them a lot of fun. Not sure whether they are quite the same genre as the games you've mentioned.

Can't say I've really played that many other Hack n Slash games. Unless you'd class Zelda as one.
yei there was much rejoicing!
I'll have a go at Dark Souls now. I gottaah! Got it as a present.

Good hack n slashes are all around-ah. You just have to feel the looove!
Yes-aah!

To summah this up I'd say Midnight Resistance was a spledidaah revisitaah on Amigaah.
I know I shouldn't that I ultimately will be disappointed, that I absolutely hate PVP gameplay (because I suck at it). But still Blade Symphony calls out to me like the sirens did to Odysseus. And I have no idea why. It's not like there'll be decapitations and amputations galore.

GOG has but it feels more like a half-baked sould calibur with schoolgirls and only one character to choose from than anything else. And I've seen [url=http://store.steampowered.com/app/7510]this one discounted often enough at a low enough price to not feel scammed even if it's shit.

Of course Carrion can tell you that even if you buy shit at a huge discount, you're still paying for (pigeon) shit.
Post edited December 16, 2014 by j0ekerr
avatar
adaliabooks: It's somewhat blasphemous, but I do enjoy Koei's Warriors series (Dynasty Warriors, Samurai Warriors). I know most people consider them mindless rubbish but I find them a lot of fun. Not sure whether they are quite the same genre as the games you've mentioned.

Can't say I've really played that many other Hack n Slash games. Unless you'd class Zelda as one.
Anything in which you slice and dice through hordes of enemies with a combination of well timed attacks and special combos can be considered a hack&slash.

Dark Souls is lacking in the combos department, but it's notoriously heavy (even to an obnoxious level sometimes) on the timed part.

Edit: Damn, double posted instead of editing.
Post edited December 16, 2014 by j0ekerr
avatar
j0ekerr: I know I shouldn't that I ultimately will be disappointed, that I absolutely hate PVP gameplay (because I suck at it). But still Blade Symphony calls out to me like the sirens did to Odysseus. And I have no idea why. It's not like there'll be decapitations and amputations galore.

GOG has but it feels more like a half-baked sould calibur with schoolgirls and only one character to choose from than anything else. And I've seen [url=http://store.steampowered.com/app/7510]this one discounted often enough at a low enough price to not feel scammed even if it's shit.

Of course Carrion can tell you that even if you buy shit at a huge discount, you're still paying for (pigeon) shit.
Have X-Blades for the 360. Good luck to you if you buy that one. -laughs-
And yes, there's a fair bit of shit (of pigeon and other varieties) in my library. Think I've gotten all the horribly notorious ones, at least.
avatar
adaliabooks: It's somewhat blasphemous, but I do enjoy Koei's Warriors series (Dynasty Warriors, Samurai Warriors). I know most people consider them mindless rubbish but I find them a lot of fun. Not sure whether they are quite the same genre as the games you've mentioned.

Can't say I've really played that many other Hack n Slash games. Unless you'd class Zelda as one.
avatar
j0ekerr: Anything in which you slice and dice through hordes of enemies with a combination of well timed attacks and special combos can be considered a hack&slash.

Dark Souls is lacking in the combos department, but it's notoriously heavy (even to an obnoxious level sometimes) on the timed part.
I've never actually played Dark Souls, and having watched a few videos it doesn't look like my kind of game. I like Dynasty Warriors because it's ridiculous (and my OCD loves all the unlockable stuff and characters to level up), but in general I find Hack n Slash combat a bit boring. I can't be bothered holding block and waiting for my opponent's attack animation to finish before I can attack or remembering long and complicated combos..

I would love to find (or make) a game with melee combat that was a bit more involved or realistic.
Just found that blade symphony is mostly a mouse and keyboard game.

I suddenly lost all interest.
avatar
LaPtiteBete: And about our habits... I'm a bit surprised to read that a lot of you seem to take medics everyday... And how you all seem to consider alcohol as a worse, if not the worst thing. Personally I don't smoke, or take any pills ; but I like to drink a glass of wine or beer when I get back home after work, during the diner, when the kids are in bed... it's a (bad) habit too. But does it make me a bad person or a wino ?... I don't drink enough to get drunk or anything (or yes, rarely, during parties... a friend's birthday, new year... ! I don't feel bad about it) ; but most of the time it's just because I appreciate it ; just a glass of good wine. And also, because this ritual helps me to relax and feel better, and less stressed by daily life... To each his own, afterall :) Be sure I'm not judging or anything, but I don't think that alcohol or cigarettes are worse than medicine... they are all drugs, all to be put on the same line to me...
I agree. I certainly don't think alcohol is worse than pills, or anything else. I didn't mean to judge, and I apologize if I made it sound that way. Personally, I don't drink because I just don't enjoy it. Most people do seem to enjoy it, and I think that's great. It just isn't for me.

I take pills everyday for some long-term problems. I realize that my medication is not good for my health, and is likely much worse for me than drinking a beer or some wine everyday. But I can't let my problems go untreated, so I take pills everyday, and they really help.
(Just to be clear, all my pills were legally prescribed by a licensed physician. I don't want people to think I am doing illegal stuff.)

I think the discussion from earlier was just about our personal preferences. We meant no criticism or judgment.
I'm coming in to the conversation late, but I take medication every day, too. Mostly vitamins and minerals, which help to keep the worst of my fibromyalgia pain at bay. I don't know whether I have trouble absorbing these things in general, whether it's because of my restricted diet, or a combination of the two. As for prescribed meds, among others, I take medication for anxiety and depression. There is a stigma attached to antidepressants, and I really don't understand it. You're not less of a person because you can't "deal" with stress and depression. It's no different than being diabetic or having high blood pressure. It's an imbalance that can -- and should -- be treated, and yet there is this perception that you're less of a person because you need these things!

Why is that? At least some of the people reading this are now thinking that I'm less of a person because I take these meds, and I don't care. I am who I am, and that hasn't changed since you found out that I take *gasp* antidepressants! I am still the ever-optimistic you knew before you read this post. I need medications to keep my body running properly, and there should be no shame in that, and so I say it loud and proud. I take medications because I need them, and my health would suffer terribly if I didn't have them. I know because I came close to dying three years ago (no, not because of depression), but those health woes are a whole different story. I've been doing much better since starting some new meds and vitamins, so no worries there :)

The above was directed at no one, I was just thinking about it because of something a "friend" once said to me about depression meds. There are many reasons we are no longer friends, and this is just one of them.

As for recreational drugs and alcohol, I do neither. I can't stand the taste of alcohol, nor the effect it has on me, and I detest the feeling of being drugged (which is why I balk at any prescribed drug that has the effect.) My dentist offered me nitrous (aka laughing gas) when I was last having work done, and though the work took FOUR hours, I declined, 'cause I absolutely can't stand the feeling.

To sum up I don't think that anyone should be judged based upon the meds that they need to take. As for the other drugs and alcohol/cigarettes, as long as they're not hurting themselves and/or others, it's their own choice, and I can respect that :)
Apropos of nothing, I have a question out of simple curiosity.

I've heard many security concerns about wifi sniffer programs intercepting data packets from the tinfoil hat wearing community.

But correct me if my assumptions are wrong or incomplete. To get to the data, they first have to crack the WPA encryption or all they get is a bunch of garbage. Without getting into arguments as to how secure WPA is (from what I know, quite a bit but not entirely uncracakable) let's assume that's cracked. If you're sending data through a https webpage, there's still the ssh encryption of the webpage itself which has to be cracked as well to read anything of what is being transfered at all, am I wrong?

Considering both encryptions, am I right assuming that only the most paranoid would be worried about personal account data being stolen through a wi-fi sniffer?

EDIT: I haven't mentioned WEP because it doesn't even bear consideration.
Post edited December 16, 2014 by j0ekerr
J0ekerr! My how you've changed! O_o
avatar
genkicolleen: I'm coming in to the conversation late, but I take medication every day, too. Mostly vitamins and minerals, which help to keep the worst of my fibromyalgia pain at bay. I don't know whether I have trouble absorbing these things in general, whether it's because of my restricted diet, or a combination of the two. As for prescribed meds, among others, I take medication for anxiety and depression. There is a stigma attached to antidepressants, and I really don't understand it. You're not less of a person because you can't "deal" with stress and depression. It's no different than being diabetic or having high blood pressure. It's an imbalance that can -- and should -- be treated, and yet there is this perception that you're less of a person because you need these things!

Why is that? At least some of the people reading this are now thinking that I'm less of a person because I take these meds, and I don't care. I am who I am, and that hasn't changed since you found out that I take *gasp* antidepressants! I am still the ever-optimistic you knew before you read this post. I need medications to keep my body running properly, and there should be no shame in that, and so I say it loud and proud. I take medications because I need them, and my health would suffer terribly if I didn't have them. I know because I came close to dying three years ago (no, not because of depression), but those health woes are a whole different story. I've been doing much better since starting some new meds and vitamins, so no worries there :)

The above was directed at no one, I was just thinking about it because of something a "friend" once said to me about depression meds. There are many reasons we are no longer friends, and this is just one of them.

As for recreational drugs and alcohol, I do neither. I can't stand the taste of alcohol, nor the effect it has on me, and I detest the feeling of being drugged (which is why I balk at any prescribed drug that has the effect.) My dentist offered me nitrous (aka laughing gas) when I was last having work done, and though the work took FOUR hours, I declined, 'cause I absolutely can't stand the feeling.

To sum up I don't think that anyone should be judged based upon the meds that they need to take. As for the other drugs and alcohol/cigarettes, as long as they're not hurting themselves and/or others, it's their own choice, and I can respect that :)
There's a stigma because to a lot of people, antidepressants equal "crazy". And "crazy" people are portrayed as everything from wacky goofballs to homicidal maniacs.

In agreement with you, such a stigma should not exist, and brain chemistry should be seen on the same level as any other kind of physical ailment - something to be treated, and that's that.

Far as alcohol and drugs go, that's up to each person, no judgment attached unless you're doing such profoundly stupid things that you're putting other people in danger or you're so far gone with addiction that you're doing bad things to people to get a fix.

Have drank til I lost the ability to speak and have taken pills to the point that I fell out of my chair, hit the floor, and didn't even feel it. (Well, not til the next day where I found I'd landed on a piece of cardboard with those stupid packing staples in it. Had a few holes in my arm as a result. -laughs-) Wouldn't recommend such things to people, but most people aren't doing that.

(Also, feel compelled to mention this just because - if you're having a really, REALLY bad day and you're waiting for the anti-anxiety pills to kick in? Give them a few minutes. Whatever you do, resist the urge to take more in the hopes that something will activate faster. They'll kick in, trust me. -laughs-)
Post edited December 16, 2014 by CarrionCrow
avatar
j0ekerr: Apropos of nothing, I have a question out of simple curiosity.

I've heard many security concerns about wifi sniffer programs intercepting data packets from the tinfoil hat wearing community.

But correct me if my assumptions are wrong or incomplete. To get to the data, they first have to crack the WPA encryption or all they get is a bunch of garbage. Without getting into arguments as to how secure WPA is (from what I know, quite a bit but not entirely uncracakable) let's assume that's cracked. If you're sending data through a https webpage, there's still the ssh encryption of the webpage itself which has to be cracked as well to read anything of what is being transfered at all, am I wrong?

Considering both encryptions, am I right assuming that only the most paranoid would be worried about personal account data being stolen through a wi-fi sniffer?
WPA/WEP are not needed for a packet sniffer to decrypt the data captured. Cracking WEP is much more easier than WPA. I think webpages which are encrypted are useless to the the attacker even if he/she decrypts packets corresponding to those.
Post edited December 16, 2014 by huN73R
avatar
j0ekerr: Apropos of nothing, I have a question out of simple curiosity.

I've heard many security concerns about wifi sniffer programs intercepting data packets from the tinfoil hat wearing community.

But correct me if my assumptions are wrong or incomplete. To get to the data, they first have to crack the WPA encryption or all they get is a bunch of garbage. Without getting into arguments as to how secure WPA is (from what I know, quite a bit but not entirely uncracakable) let's assume that's cracked. If you're sending data through a https webpage, there's still the ssh encryption of the webpage itself which has to be cracked as well to read anything of what is being transfered at all, am I wrong?

Considering both encryptions, am I right assuming that only the most paranoid would be worried about personal account data being stolen through a wi-fi sniffer?

EDIT: I haven't mentioned WEP because it doesn't even bear consideration.
No clue on that one, sorry. I get my video games, Cheez Whiz and riding crop fetish porn the old-fashioned way - wired connection to a modem.
avatar
j0ekerr: Considering both encryptions, am I right assuming that only the most paranoid would be worried about personal account data being stolen through a wi-fi sniffer?
SSH takes a few hours to break in a best-case scenario for the attacker. But the realistic worst-case scenario for the attacker is only a few days, because the people paranoid enough to use really good passphrases are outliers.
WPA doesn't fold like WEP in a matter of seconds, but most users are susceptible to a rainbow table of some sort. If you think adding a number here or there in place of a letter makes your password s00p3r 53curE, then you don't know enough about entropy just yet.

In general, if you are banking online, your credentials will not be stolen by cracking open a tunnel and then brute forcing some hashy mess. They'll be stolen by hijacking your browser session, probably coming through an add-on or plug-in of some sort. Wireless security is pretty good. It's not the machine that will fail you. You will fail you.

[url= That's a generic "you" up there, not a you "you". I do know a lot more about networking and information security than the average bear; I'm also a bit more paranoid about it. If you genuinely worry about the security of your information, then do these things, in order of easy to hard: avoid wireless networking; take the time to create good passwords and passphrases, and keep them written down somewhere easy for you to get to but hard to associate with your online identity; use anonymized routing; use stateless virtual machines for high-risk information.][/url]