It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
avatar
rtcvb32: Hmmm...

Higher framerates for TV isn't a sell on me, not because it can't be good, but i keep seeing on the demos where they run a movie, it runs smooth, then glitches after 2 seconds and loses 2-3 frames in a stutter. (might be 24->48 frames, and missing 12 frames, with 60hz refresh; Had it been in UK/Europe with 50Hz refresh the problem would be barely noticeable)
Oh god, don't watch movies at anything but 24fps. I was only talking about games. A lot of older games were built for 30fps and when playing at 60 (or even higher) there are animation issues. Bioshock is a good example.
avatar
rtcvb32: Reminds me, for more PC stuff, RinkWorks is another source; You'll be reading and laughing for hours.
Just noticed, that rinkworks site you posted hasn't been updated in 5 years. Is it officially dead? What's the story with it?
avatar
rtcvb32: Hmmm...

Higher framerates for TV isn't a sell on me, not because it can't be good, but i keep seeing on the demos where they run a movie, it runs smooth, then glitches after 2 seconds and loses 2-3 frames in a stutter. (might be 24->48 frames, and missing 12 frames, with 60hz refresh; Had it been in UK/Europe with 50Hz refresh the problem would be barely noticeable)
avatar
StingingVelvet: Oh god, don't watch movies at anything but 24fps. I was only talking about games. A lot of older games were built for 30fps and when playing at 60 (or even higher) there are animation issues. Bioshock is a good example.
The other day I caught my Aunt watching the original "Bladerunner" on a 6 inch laptop screen. I think that should be against the law.
avatar
tinyE: The other day I caught my Aunt watching the original "Bladerunner" on a 6 inch laptop screen. I think that should be against the law.
My flatmate watches his movies on his mobile phone, so...
:D
avatar
tinyE: The other day I caught my Aunt watching the original "Bladerunner" on a 6 inch laptop screen. I think that should be against the law.
avatar
babark: My flatmate watches his movies on his mobile phone, so...
:D
Well it depends on the movie. "Steel Magnolias" big deal, but "Bladrunner"!? "Star Wars"!? "Close Encounters"!? NO!!!!
avatar
nicohvc: The most stupid quote that I've read more than once (unbelievable) "The PC has no exclusives" when all we know that PC has the largest catalog ever (+ exclusives) and even exclusives game genres like RTS (rare being seen on consoles)
avatar
rtcvb32: I'm reminded of Starcraft for N64. While the base game did get on it, it was missing a lot, like voice acting, animation, it was gimped to work around the controller, and otherwise a really poor port. (mostly due to ROM space)

For those quoting such lines as 'PC has no exclusives' they obviously never looked at the back catalog of games. Though some like certain Ultima games didd get a console port, they were either gimped/changed, or the no-mouse made UI management a pain (moreso than it already was), needing a lot of convenience features that aren't present.
Strarcraft 64 is an interesting piece of collection. The only Blizzard game on the console and it has his own missions (altough playing is a pain in the ass). I've never tryed yet but I'm a big fan of Starcraft Broodwar since almost 20 years
I've remember AOE 2 age of kings beign ported on the PS2... lol ^^
avatar
StingingVelvet: Oh god, don't watch movies at anything but 24fps. I was only talking about games. A lot of older games were built for 30fps and when playing at 60 (or even higher) there are animation issues. Bioshock is a good example.
I'm in the opposite camp on this.
IIRC, our TV does support 24Hz, but I think frame interpolation (aka. Intelligent Frame Creation, aka. ...) is great.

When in a cinema, I sometimes get annoyed at the "flicker" at first. Oddly enough, not always.
Anyway, after a few minutes, I usually forget about it and no longer notice it.
At least until the movie ends, the light is turned back on, and real life's proper frame rate returns. :-)
avatar
StingingVelvet: Oh god, don't watch movies at anything but 24fps. I was only talking about games. A lot of older games were built for 30fps and when playing at 60 (or even higher) there are animation issues. Bioshock is a good example.
avatar
brouer: I'm in the opposite camp on this.
IIRC, our TV does support 24Hz, but I think frame interpolation (aka. Intelligent Frame Creation, aka. ...) is great.

When in a cinema, I sometimes get annoyed at the "flicker" at first. Oddly enough, not always.
Anyway, after a few minutes, I usually forget about it and no longer notice it.
At least until the movie ends, the light is turned back on, and real life's proper frame rate returns. :-)
When I'm in a cinema I worry about this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GEQVS-ZE9-o
avatar
babark: I dunno, I seem to be of the almost exact opposite viewpoint. I use a car regularly, and get oil changes done when scheduled to, but if I'm required to do something beyond change the tire, I'll be at a loss. I'd call someone to get it fixed.
These things are all tools, mean to help us lead better lives, not unwritten obligations to get a minor degree in computing.
And I feel that someone refusing to use something like a computer because they feel they're not knowledgeable enough about it is...childish and frustrating.
I learned my first programming language in 1 night. I would've timed myself if i knew so many people would've considered that such a big deal. Granted, I wasn't as good as I am now at it, but i read the book mentioned in the following link back when i was in middle school

http://www.wrox.com/WileyCDA/WroxTitle/Beginning-Visual-C-6.productCd-0764543881.html

Didn't take me long at all. I'm not even asking people to have that much knowledge. You should know about alternative booting methods, you should be aware of how to get to your BIOS, and if something breaks inside and you know what it is, you should be able to replace it. None of that's overly complicated, and the number of people that brag about such skills is appalling. You should have enough knowledge to diagnose basic problems and then do research on them. People who don't know how to use quotes and minus symbols on a given search engine is enough to say you shouldn't be left alone on a computer. This is why viruses and such are out of control. This is why IT people spend more time trying to shut employees out of their computers than fixing the backlog of actually broken computers. You should have enough knowledge to turn around and do your own research on how to learn what that degree teaches you if you want the information. If you don't, you should still have enough knowledge to be able to research it when the time comes that you actually need that knowledge.
All that is, of course, besides the main point: No offense to rtcvb32 at all, but I didn't really find the video posted in the original post amusing, or instructive or even beneficial to anyone- I mean that last point in the sense that they "deserve" ostracism. That sort of attitude brings to mind a road-ragey friend of mine who felt the need to "teach the other drivers lessons" when they cut him off by overtaking them and slowing down in front of them to frustrate them- didn't serve any purpose except to make me not want to be in the car with him :D.
They might "deserve" ostracism, but I don't care enough about other people's opinions on their own stuff to bother with it.

Wow, that was certainly a very long post by me about essentially nothing...
A driver on the road who does dumb things has malice and/or a lack of ethics. With computers, people are dangerous and turn around when they do something wrong and said "i didn't know any better." At least the other driver admits they should have been paying attention. And, if they don't, we actually still hold them accountable.

avatar
kohlrak: I'm of the opinion that if you use a tool, you should reasonably be informed on how to fix and maintain it to a reasonable degree. If you're trying to use a microwave, and you're standing there confused because it's in timer mode or something, and you can't figure out how to get it back, i am going to make fun of you. I don't care if it hurts your feelings. If you don't know how, to a reasonable degree, something works, you are a danger to yourself and those around you. The same thing can be said about computers, believe it or not. The same thing can even be said about consoles, though to a lesser degree. I don't care if you "don't have an interest," and neither does danger. Making fun of these people is a form of ostracism which is often ultimately for their own benefit.
avatar
StingingVelvet: I wasn't talking about basic use scenarios, but more the deep dive of "this runs at 60hz but the animation is 30hz and it feels weird" kind of anal expertise. My dad can use his laptop to order parts and read unfortunately chosen news sites, but could he add more RAM or reformat it? Probably not, and I think that's fine. I know how to drive a car and maybe change a tire, but for everything else there's AAA and mechanics.

I find PC gaming's benefits far outweigh its negatives, but the majority of society disagrees and I understand that.
Changing oil and tires are pretty basic. Maybe headlights too. Engine? nah. But getting RAM, graphics cards, etc, no, that's easy, and if it's not, you should be able to google it.

But there's another issue, here. With your father's knowledge, do you think he'd be sitting there making comments about how the framerates don't match? I certainly hope not. If he does, when he very well knows he doesn't have a clue what he's talking about, deserves to be made fun of. If he keeps quiet, or shows at least some degree of humility with words like "i think," well then that's a whole other story, and I could respect that.
Wait, wait, I've got one:

"Strange developers on the internet distributing games is no basis for a system of entertainment. Supreme gaming experience derives from a mandate from the owner of the platform, not from some farcical open market."
avatar
Breja: Wait, wait, I've got one:

"Strange developers on the internet distributing games is no basis for a system of entertainment. Supreme gaming experience derives from a mandate from the owner of the platform, not from some farcical open market."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iu7vySQbgXI
sorry but i'm still trying to recover my sanity from the comment in one of the first videos about 12GB video ram GPU cannot match the 500gb or storage of a console...


i mean, from what i understood, or at least it's the way i took this serie of videos, it's not exactly about "pc master race thing" (maybe a bit) or "console players are dumb" as a whole; the person clearly states that he is referring to a portion of console gamers who behave like clueless people spreading uninformed FUD and lies with more balls than a whole flock of bulls.

I had been playing (and still do) on both computer(s) and consoles for the last 30 years (including non PC computer); but what i clearly dislike is the false facts and blatant lies about tech, especially from people who clearly don't even have a clue about the techs they are trying to talk about in such an arrogant way to gain some edge in their biased fanboyish delusional crusades

and aside from the ridiculous false statements backed up by nothing but bravado or rethorical loopholes, there is also the half truth that is kept being repeated as if doing that long and often enough will turn them into full truth or such.

And, so, yes, this serie of videos amused me so far, but also infuriated me equally as well, because of some completely ridiculous comments i saw there or people who are not only clueless, but also are proud of it and act as if they were expert.

When i am not sure of a fact or info, i'll try to verify it; if it's something based on tech or similar thing, i'll read unbiased documentation on it (not some random article of some bloggers), or ultimately i'll try to experience the whole thing myself. But sure, it would be way easier for me to go full speed on the route of "i don't know jackshit about some topic, but i'll say whatever i feel like about it and claim i know my stuff with any quickly baked arguments i would get out of my rethorical oven". Sadly, the majority of people go this route and as they outnumber the dumb people like me who are stupid enough to just inform themselves and verify facts, they end up defining what new truth is... Which is sad.
avatar
tinyE: The other day I caught my Aunt watching the original "Bladerunner" on a 6 inch laptop screen. I think that should be against the law.
avatar
babark: My flatmate watches his movies on his mobile phone, so...
:D
in my country, back in the 14th century, we used to burn heretics for less than that !
Post edited March 06, 2018 by Djaron
avatar
StingingVelvet: Though I do hate it when, after I tell someone in real life that I'm a PC gamer, they reply "isn't PC gaming dead?" That's happened less lately though, thanks to... well, the service which shall not be named.
Most people I know IRL don't even know the difference between a console and a PC when it comes to gaming. I do notice it's more common with younger people to know about games or being a gamer. But that doesn't make them make any less worthy, like you say, just not interested in gaming.

And an opinion on whether or not you can distinguish framerates above 30 fps, is not something I care much about.
avatar
Djaron: sorry but i'm still trying to recover my sanity from the comment in one of the first videos about 12GB video ram GPU cannot match the 500gb or storage of a console...
Common misconceptions are from buzzwords and not understanding the differences, like comparing ram to the CPU speed. Though Sony/Sega/Atari certainly didn't do much better when having ads for Blast Processing and 64bit processors

avatar
Djaron: i mean, from what i understood, or at least it's the way i took this serie of videos, it's not exactly about "pc master race thing" (maybe a bit) or "console players are dumb" as a whole; the person clearly states that he is referring to a portion of console gamers who behave like clueless people spreading uninformed FUD and lies with more balls than a whole flock of bulls.
Seems more focused on fanboys.


avatar
Djaron: And, so, yes, this serie of videos amused me so far, but also infuriated me equally as well, because of some completely ridiculous comments i saw there or people who are not only clueless, but also are proud of it and act as if they were expert.
I stopped listening somewhere around video 18 (so people starting at #20 might be better than #1...) lots of duplication, some good stupidity, plenty of repeated stupidity. When facts fail it goes to cursing and exclusives for fanboys.

avatar
DubConqueror: Most people I know IRL don't even know the difference between a console and a PC when it comes to gaming.
Today? Other than being locked, can't be upgraded and proprietary.... they aren't much different from PC's as they use the same hardware. So confusion between them is easy.

Though the lack of mouse/keyboard would be the biggest difference...
Post edited March 07, 2018 by rtcvb32
avatar
DubConqueror: Most people I know IRL don't even know the difference between a console and a PC when it comes to gaming.
avatar
rtcvb32: Today? Other than being locked, can't be upgraded and proprietary.... they aren't much different from PC's as they use the same hardware. So confusion between them is easy.

Though the lack of mouse/keyboard would be the biggest difference...
I meant to say they wouldn't know the difference as most people I know IRL have zero interest in gaming.