He meant it's not existing in the game, that's all...

You're telling "Womanizer" is NOT a rape culture term?

Geez, you're oblivious...

It's not the way I would do things but it has nothing to with rape.

I'm pretty sure there is consent involved.

No, it is not. A Womanizer is simply someone who is not comfortable with one woman only - it has absolutely NOTHING to do with rape.

Wiki says "Womanizer" (term), a promiscuous heterosexual man"

It might be okay to get upset about themes in games you aren't comfortable with (though I'd still argue that a game is a game is a game) but making things up just to be able to complain is ridiculous. Leisure Suit Larry btw was a womanizer too. And to outline what rape culture is (so that you can learn a thing or two) ... I'll include another wiki definition for you:

"Rape culture is a setting, studied by several sociological theories, in which rape is pervasive and normalized due to societal attitudes about gender and sexuality. Behaviors commonly associated with rape culture include victim blaming, slut-shaming, sexual objectification, trivializing rape, denial of widespread rape, refusing to acknowledge the harm caused by sexual violence, or some combination of these.It has been used to describe and explain behavior within social groups, including prison rape and in conflict areas where war rape is used as psychological warfare. Entire societies have been alleged to be rape cultures."

You COULD argue that what the character in this game is doing is "sexual objectification" but I would not go that far (not before having played the game myself to be able to judge). The description alone simply says that the main character thinks that he can seduce every woman - does not need to mean that he only sees them as sex objects.

I have a serious question for the people here who have a problem with games that have sex or even rape. Which do you consider worse, rape or murder? There are TONS of games that exist that include MASSIVE amounts of murder. There are games where you can kill people, butcher people, chop limbs off and see fountains of blood. You can flamethrower people, melt people, explode people, freeze and shatter people, squish people, drown people. Most games with murder have you killing hundreds of people by the end. There are games where you can wipe out entire planets of their populations. Why aren't you complaing about ANY of them??? Why aren't you worried that little timmy or sally are playing games where they run over dozens of people with their cars or pop heads with sniper headshots and laugh about it???

Why are you SO upset at games with sex, or gays, or threesomes, or seduction, or anything else? Even rape, bestiatliy, necrophilia or pedophilia can't compare to all the violence and beatings and cruelty and murder and deaths that occur in countless games. Why aren't you demanding NSFW tags for every violent game out there? Why aren't you complaining about all the "sickos" that "get off" on killing people? Why can't you grasp that all of these things are GAMES, and NONE of it is real???

Sorry to hear you hate non-bigoted stores and want discrimination. Feel free to visit stores that push that. Has newsmax or oann opened any yet?

You need to be an adult to be on gog. Their entire site is therefore NSFW.

Yes! I myself find walking sims questionable, but I ultimately accept they fall under the umbrella of "games". People may not like visual novels, or they may not like the content of them, but they are still games, and there are people who enjoy them. All we have here, like EVERY time, are people whining about people they don't know enjoying games they don't play. Was that not the main complaint over people like Sarkeesian? How many of these complaining puritans complained about her and people like her I wonder.

Did you ever ask yourself: "Why does Youtube have videos with massive gore and slaughter but if you show ONE female nipple, even in a non-sexual context, this video gets banned?"

We're living in times with weird moral standards nowadays...

Oh I've thought a fair deal about it and reached my own conclusions, but I like to hear directly from others what their reasons are, rather then presume.

'

You know...you are either intentionally being very disingenuous by misrepresenting me or you clearly cannot read. I don't have a problem with anything here at all. I was making fun of these games, the people who play them, and generally here in general. I don't give two shits what people do. So...next time, don't just pick a sentence from a paragraph and pretend to be onto something revolutionary and insightful. You clumsily went out of your way to misrepresent the entire context of what I typed...so that kinda makes you a lying sack of shit...but anyway....That's what preachers and ministers do. lol ClownWorld indeed. lol As for your thoughts theories and conclusions on modern day morality...save it. You have to have common-sense to make those kind of statements. You can't even draw context from written work. lol Epic Fail!

Thank you for bringing it to GoG :)