leimboy: I understand and to a certain point agree with the negativity and betrayal many feel towards this game, I myself thought much the same.
At some point I figured that staying away from the game would only hurt myself in the end, so I downloaded it from Epic shortly after it was released there.
That was a beta version and a game under heavy development, but as it was patched and features added it became a really strong game with very enjoyable turn based tactical combat (TBTC).
The developers have really listened to the community and many (most?) of the requested features have been implemented rapidly from the Epic release date. In a way they released an early access / beta version and with the added fund from Epic could spend a full year extra on development (which was really needed, as I'm sure everyone in that community can agree on). The year one edition seems to be the best edition of this game so far, and if the developers keep listening to the community it might just be one of my favourite TBTC games of all times.
It is by no means perfect, but for me and my taste it's not far away either.
I would recommend anyone with a slight interest in this game not to pass up on it just out of spite.
I respect the middle paragraph you have there but I really have to object to the last one. If a company brakes trust with a large part of it's audience, especially in a crowd funding environment where trust is pivotal, and does so for a sack of cash (even if some portion of that sack of cash is put back into the company) then it's not "just out of spite" or even spite at all to warn others that this company - regardless of the qualty of this particular product - doesn't deserve the full faith and confidence of the end user. It's no small matter to break an explicit - not implict - promise. If someone pays for a physical item and is told after they're charged that they'll be getting something other than what they were sold they would be understadably upset and would look elsewhere for shoping in the future. This really isn't much diffrent.
Is the game potentially good? Probably.
Has the company really worked to make it better? I'll take your word for it and assume yes.
Do either of these things, if taken as facts, mean they've earned back the trust they sold? No, it simply doesn't.
My TL:DR if anyone is looking for a "point' to this, buy the game if it looks good but wait for a major discount 75%+ because the copmany is going to have to behave in a pro user manner for several more title/years to begin restoring the trust they lost by literally selling out.