reative00: "Hollow Knight" - 2,158 backers pledged AU$ 57,138 to help bring this project to life. /Released on GoG
Wishbone: Looking at the trailer, this looks polished and well made, with interesting gameplay, and a consistent aesthetic.
reative00: "A House of Many Doors" - 1,103 backers pledged £12,866 to help bring this project to life. /Refused by GoG
Wishbone: Looking at the trailer, this looks like crap made by amateurs, with awful disjointed gameplay, and no consistent aesthetic.
reative00: Well done guys. You have lost my respect and Hearthlands is officially last game I've bought from you until you create clear rules about publishing games here because currently this is just odd, dumb and leave bad taste in mouth.
Wishbone: I guess the rule in this case is "If it seems like a good game, release it. If it seems like a bad game, don't."
In some cases, the reasons for GOG accepting or rejecting certain games seem incomprehensible. This does not seem to be one of those cases though.
Would you mind explaining exactly why you clearly think that A House of Many Doors deserves to be released here, while Hollow Knight does not? All you have said is "GOG released one game and rejected another. Now I'll never buy anything here again", which quite frankly doesn't make sense.
"A House of Many Doors" was game partially funded by Failbetter Games - the company behind quite successful Sunless Sea (available here), it's DLC Zubmariner (available here) and upcoming Sunless Skies (going to be available here). Their funding program is
https://www.failbettergames.com/fundbetter/ quite strict. So I do believe that if BOTH Kickstarter users AND company with some experience in making QUALITY games agreed this is something worth funding I'm kinda pissed that for GoG it's not good enough.
I got it, GoG has to make cash. Until some time they were making it being a friendly company. If they're going to turn into "we only accept games that will bring us AT LEAST that and that much of money" I'm not going to support their DRM-free process anymore because it's not so far from "we've started using DRM for certain games that otherwise wouldn't agree to publish here, but it's gonna be only a few titles per year" and finally into "DRM-free option is now optional for publishers".
"GOG can run their store - curating the catalog that they sell - as they wish."
Oh damn, my favorite argument. YES, they can do what they like. And I, as customer with over 200 games here, can tell company that I'm not going to support said practice and inform them about my decision. That's also free market for you.