It makes young boys smoke weed and become rapists.

Never trust anything that bleeds for five days and doesn’t die.
I guess "young boys" don't watch TV or Movies or visit internet.

I can see how that might be too titillating for former convicts.

I am a believer in the idea that everyone should be able to say whatever they bloody well please. If you don't like it, that's fine but silencing one group over another is wrong.

People who oppose this should really think about how how many idiots lose it when a game shows any instance of sex / nudity. Its a kind of invisible restriction gaming has imposed on itself and there are many who would take up the sword to fight to keep it that way.

Censorship lies on "both" sides of the "left-right spectrum". They agree on restricting thoughts and ideas.

Nah. Tit missiles FTW.

Yep!!

LOL you are right.

I mostly see censorship as problem when the thing being censored has some kind of value. For instance, I use spamfilters and ad-blockers and I don't even feel bad, because I don't really feel that the content has all much importance. As I see it, artistic renderings of various body parts has actual value. Racist opinions does not. And history seems to agree with me - nobody consider 'On the Jews and Their Lies' to be worth much, except as a case study on the looneyness of the author. But 'Fanny Hill' gets a reprint, because, actual value!

Rather than left or right, it's a conservative's thing: left conservatives censor on ideological grounds, such as "racism", "sexism" or the catch-all "promotes discrimination", while right conservatives censor on moral grounds, such as "promotes sex", "promotes violence", and the catch-all "corrupts our youths". They'll both censor anything made by a recognized member of the opposite sector, though, regardless of actual content. Similarly, it's opposed by liberals on both sides of the spectrum, such as anarcho-colectivists on the left and anarcho-capitalists on the right, both of which see state censorship as a much bigger sin than anything you may possibly write or record.

Of course, they seldom admit as such when confronted with it; often they'll claim is for protecting impressionable people ("they're taking advantage of people!"), consumer's rights or even freedom itself ("people should be free to go to a bookstore without seeing $X!"), but test them on the alleged "value" of a few sampled works and authors and the old party lines should soon become apparent.

My advice is to seek online for a pdf of it, it might exist somewhere in the internet and all. My old, former self, posted many times before i kind of "retired": "Piracy had been true democracy once" and "Piracy is FREEDOM", sometimes, after all! And no mistake. In the past, even here on gog, even a developer said once to their fans to torrent their game, in areas which had it banned.

Now you're gonna say masturbation doesn't make people blind. And the leading cause of juvenile delinquency is gangster movies and GTA.

I've read all your posts here, and I'm still not sure about what point are you trying to make O_o
Constant sarcasm in each reply to everyone?