The_Puppet94: A clear definition how GOG interprets DRM would help us cutsomers to better understand their values and it would be easier for us to compare if their values match our personal values.
The site looks like it's not loading properly at the moment, but have you considered GOG's "sister site"
https://fckdrm.com ?
They do a compare/contrast between DRM-free and DRM.
Backup, copy, use anywhere
No one else gets a say in how you store and access your media. You bought it, you own it.
Access offline
Don't rely on your internet connection. If not on principle, then for stability and convenience.
Keep your consumer rights
Don’t hand your rights over to corporations that wouldn't trust you. Some relationships are based on trust, others on control and suspicion.
Support digital preservation
By choosing the right sources, you know that the content you bought will remain with you – no matter when it was created or for what hardware.
Lose all access, just like that
Online ownership checks can, and do, fail. Scheduled downtime, technical issues, and corporations shutting down are just everyday facts of life.
Additionally, to be featured on the site, a source of media must be "100% DRM-free".
Of course, to anyone examining this issue honestly, it is clear GOG does not meet their "own" standards set forth on FCKDRM.com.
So I don't think it matters having their definition or not. They obviously couldn't care less about it.