I completely disagree. Forum censorship is one of my main reasons for being in this thread. IMO its the most critical issue for this thread. Because with forum censorship they can just kill this thread. So the biggest threat. So while technically from the POV of someone who personally does not have an issue (in terms of reason for boycotting) with forum censorship forum censorship may be irrelevant for the "topic" but its still highly relevant for this thread about the topic.
I havent bought anything since Dec-12 and used to buy lots before that. (Not formally boycotting though.)

Edit: pointless re/edit - messed up posting.

Depends on your definition of morality. I am sure GOG strictly follows morality of corporate capitalism.

Sure :-) And tbh it probably was always naive to expect anything different, in the end it's a corporation like any other.

sign me up for "unofficial boycott". i hardly buy anything these days anyways
because of my backlog, freeware, abandonware, animes and lack of motivation to beat games.
Hear ye hear ye.

RIP, whatshisname /fit/ guy.

Also: The OP (poster) has "Free speech and honey!" under the forum name ('Time4Tea') and in the OP (post) mentions (Chinese) censorship as one of the reasons for boycotting:

The fact that GOG is not letting 3rd parties hijack their platform by turning it into a medium for bashing China and its government is a *good* thing in my opinion - and a strong argument against any boycott. GOG should stick to being a politically neutral game distribution platform and it should resist the pressure of this current political moment to join the information war against China with content aimed at questioning the legitimacy of its government. China is hardly unique in censoring information and Chinese are not unique in demanding basic respect as paying customers. Those who want to raise their principled voice against censorship would be better served by starting right at home, China should be the last of their worries (unless they themselves actually live in China). I am for instance, as a non-US citizen, far more affected by US censorship than by anything China does and I think this holds true for the vast majority of GOG users...

Can you elaborate on this?

In principle I agree with this...however, as I understand it, the (ill-advised) joke about Xi Jinping would have been already removed in the version of Devotion that would have come to Gog - so just by releasing the game Gog wouldn't have endorsed anything directed against Xi and the PRC (if I'm wrong about this, I'm open to corrections).
As for politically neutral platform, I also agree with that in principle...but gimme a break, Gog sees nothing wrong with publishing a game promoting far left rioting, at a time when there has just been months of violent rioting by far left extremists in the US, and when far left violence is a serious problem in many other Western countries. They aren't "politically neutral", they just go along with what's best for their business. In China that means behaving submissively towards the party's leadership, in the West it means going along with the "progressive" agenda and its egregious double standards. That's not neutral at all.

Note that all the following is my own personal perspective on this. I do believe that some other people here have quite different ones.
I dont agree with your perspective. Its GOG doing the censorship and not China. My issues are with GOG.

I do believe you got this the wrong way round: GOG took a political position by reversing their Devotion release. This is the originating cause for the China bashing here. And I dont see why that would be an argument against a boycott. I am not here for China bashing. I am here in this thread (in terms of the censorship context, there are other reasons for me being here too) because GOG censors stuff (Devotion, forum). Not because of it having to do anything with China.

For me this is not a political issue. If anything its an anti-political issue. I dont want politics (etc) dictating what can or cant be released or said on GOG.

I dont see your point - especially as you complain then about US censorship:
GOG is in Europe, you are in Europe, I am in Europe.
GOG is in this forum, you are in this forum, I am in this forum.

Yes, it’s very politically neutral, the recent tonight we riot is a good example of that!

Achieving neutrality by publishing only non-political games is not really an option, since any game could be seen to have political connotations if you look hard enough. Some have more and some have less, but you can find something that someone will be upset about in anything.

To be politically neutral, GOG would need to publish games based solely on what its customers would buy, regardless of their political connotations. If GOG is picking and choosing which games to publish based on their political connotations, then it is not being politically neutral, especially if it is basing its choice on demands from governments.

Hard to do that if for some reason , China decides to flood GOG with CCP nationalist "gamers".

"we have bigger problems on the radar so let's ignore this one"
Please...

Pick one as you are contradicting yourself.

Don't misunderstand. They do not have so called standards so the rules associated with those don't apply to them from their perspective.