It seems that you're using an outdated browser. Some things may not work as they should (or don't work at all).
We suggest you upgrade newer and better browser like: Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer or Opera

×
Thanks for all the feedback you gave us after the previous update. You’re awesome and it shows the GOG insights piques your interest. Today’s article is about a topic that we know is very important to you – our commitment to DRM-free gaming and what it exactly means.

GOG was built on trust, which is at the very core of our identity. It is evidenced by our 30-day refund policy or releasing games DRM-free, among other things. At the same time, we understand DRM-free might mean different things to different people, especially when modern games blend offline and online experiences.

When GOG first launched, the gaming market looked very different from what it is now – retail was the main place to buy games, and digital distribution was just taking baby steps. DRM, the copy protection software created to protect licenses against unauthorized disc copying, was a huge source of annoyance for gamers often restricting how they can access their content. From the beginning, part of GOG’s mission was to provide gamers with a simple way to access and play games, without the need to fiddle with files or deal with any DRM. Making sure you can play games purchased on GOG offline, make backup copies, and install them as many times as you need is even more relevant now, as things like game preservation become an important topic for the whole industry.

Today, while some of the most infamous DRMs of the past are thankfully long gone, it doesn’t mean the constraints are fully gone. They just have a different, more complex face.

Games are evolving and many titles offer features beyond single-player offline gameplay, like multiplayer, achievements, vanities, rewards. Many such games are already on GOG and will continue to join our catalog. But it also raises the question: is this a new frontier for DRM?

And this is the crux of the matter. Some think it is, some don’t. Some hate it, some don’t mind it. And to be fair, we didn’t comment on it ourselves for quite some time and feel this is the time to do so:

We believe you should have freedom of choice and the right to decide how you use, enjoy, and keep the games you bought. It manifests in three points:
1. The single-player mode has to be accessible offline.

2. Games you bought and downloaded can never be taken from you or altered against your will.

3. The GOG GALAXY client is and will remain optional for accessing single-player offline mode.


We fully commit to all those points. Aside from this, we reaffirm our continuous effort to make games compatible with future OSs and available for you for years to come.

As for multiplayer, achievements, and all that jazz – games with those features belong on GOG. Having said that, we believe that you have the right to make an informed choice about the content that you choose to enjoy and we won’t tell you how and where you can access or store your games. To make it easier to discover titles that include features like multiplayer, unlockable cosmetics, timed events, or user-generated content, we’re adding information about such functionalities on product pages. In short, you’ll always know.

We always took a lot of pride in the freedom we provide gamers. While we know DRM-free may have a different meaning to everyone, we believe you have the right to decide how you use, enjoy, and keep the titles you get on GOG. With games evolving towards adding more online features, we want you to understand our DRM-free approach and what it means to us. It is an important topic – let us know what you think.
low rated
avatar
ReynardFox: How much you all want to bet GOG starts doubling down with stricter moderation in the face of all the criticism and dissent instead of actually listening to the users and the issues being raised in this thread (and elsewhere)?
Given what I know and from personal experience over the last several years, i'd say that is a distinct possibility.

=-=-=-=-=

avatar
David9855: What games that GOG sells are 'rape porn'
There are adult games now sold on GOG, with some such themes.
Post edited March 19, 2022 by GamezRanker
high rated
avatar
chandra: I’ve seen an avid discussion about what DRM and DRM-free really stands for
[..] you may not agree with our definition, but we do stand by it. Games with features like multiplayer, achievements, vanities, rewards, timed events, etc. belong on GOG.
That being said, we’re adding notices about such functionalities on product pages so you can make an informed choice
[..] we believe each developer has the right to decide whether they want to give additional incentives, like cosmetics, that do not impact the single-player gameplay
Umm.. I can understand multiplayer features being tied to Galaxy (since publishers don't care about Lan and private servers), but IMO cosmetics and other functionalities (achievs too) for the single player part should be fully available offline and in standalones.
If Gog games can start having missing features at some point, then it's a problem..
I use Galaxy, but my main incentive to use Gog is the (complete) standalones option.
Post edited March 19, 2022 by phaolo
avatar
Matruchus: The other thing is the problem that even gogs offline installers automatically search for Galaxy and I already had issues where I could not install a gog game cause it wouldn't install without a Galaxy client on Linux. This is a big issue for me.
Could you give us any examples of these offline installers that have failed to install without finding the Galaxy client on the system, these kind of problems tend to get fixed faster the more of us know about them.

avatar
torham: The problem with Galaxy is that it has already became the go to method of adding DRM to the multiplayer experience.
The problem is actually with Steam having given an API and tools for the developers that apparently make it easier for them to develop multiplayer support and thanks to that they are no longer willing to "re-invent the wheel" by coding a replacement from scratch for their Steam implementation just to sell a few more copies here, so the Galaxy API is more like a necessary band-aid on an open wound in multiplayer development practices that Steam has caused and which will not close as long as long as there are enough Steam users allowing it to stay open.

avatar
Catmancer: With this, I do hope Hitman comes back. I'm glad I had the foresight to buy before it got pulled, but I feel that as long as I can still play the single player mode offline, then it is drm-free.
Please, the Hitman 2016 release was like raw steak with nothing but one leaf of salad on top, while most of the DRM issues with other games here are more like some of the ingredients in a vegetarian dish having minuscule traces of insect fragments found on them from insects that had gotten sucked in by the harvester and then had got crushed in the process or some of the DRM-free multiplayer support advocates having made the incorrect assumption that GOG's 100% meat-free promise must have meant that they promised to be a vegan restaurant.

avatar
Cantiras: Is CD PROJEKT S.A. / GOG sp. z o.o. open to reconsidering Devotion's inclusion on GOG.com? Or is this not a possibility whatsoever?
Sure, it will happen as soon as first world countries dare to allow Taiwan to set up official embassies on their soil...

avatar
serpantino: So what possible benefit does it have for them trying to force people to use your 'optional' client through exclusive content then?
avatar
MarkoH01: That's the big question, isn't it? But how should GOG or GOG staff know about it? Don't forget: they are independent from each other :D
Once again, the GOG Galaxy is the entire CDP Group's client, so the "GOG" part is there only because the CDP Group has refused to launch a separate store for Gwent, CP2077 and their future releases that may very well continue to tarnish GOG's principles.
avatar
JAAHAS: Once again, the GOG Galaxy is the entire CDP Group's client, so the "GOG" part is there only because the CDP Group has refused to launch a separate store for Gwent, CP2077 and their future releases that may very well continue to tarnish GOG's principles.
But if CDPR is so different from GOG they could not have anything to do with a client that only benefits GOG. It's nice that YOU are telling me that they are more or less the same (and I already knew this) but who am I not to believe GOG staff who just told me that they are different? This whole "we don't want to go against the wishes of our partners" explanation simply is a big joke when it comes to CDPR and GOG since they ARE in fact two parts of the same company in the end and we all know this (anybody ever saw the movie "Primal Fear"? ;)).
Post edited March 19, 2022 by MarkoH01
low rated
avatar
JAAHAS: Sure, it will happen as soon as first world countries dare to allow Taiwan to set up official embassies on their soil...
"So you're telling me there's a chance..."
low rated
avatar
bombardier: It is quite funny to see people berating GoG for trying to expand their game offer, but at the same time they are vehemently defending GoG selling rape porn.

I guess it is ok only if they do something you are ok with and everything else should be banned.
avatar
David9855: What games that GOG sells are 'rape porn'
https://www.gog.com/en/game/detective_girl_of_the_steam_city

She's literally R'd multiple times, i was kinda surprised the 'high curation' picked it up
low rated
avatar
bombardier: It is quite funny to see people berating GoG for trying to expand their game offer, but at the same time they are vehemently defending GoG selling rape porn.
There is not inconsiderable overlap between the "DRM-free games I don't like shouldn't be here" and the "DRM is just fine and dandy" crowds. Both should be dismissed.
low rated
Bravo! Your points clarify the most im portant points. I always will opt for the DRM free iteration of a game. In fact I almost stopped buying titles with DRM on them. On the other hand I never was that concerned about having to log into any client to play multiplayer - I once was and I know that this isses still bugs many people but the industry wants to control servers and sell you stuff and whatnot. Finally: The Step to clearly announce on the storefront what I buy into is very important to avoid a debacle like Hitman... I almost bought this game on GOG until I found out, how heavy online elements are linked with the singleplayer experience... I`d be very frustrated to find out, that I bought such a game on GOG, not knowing what I did ;-)

Once again: Bravo!

Keep goning!

All the best!

phil
low rated
avatar
David9855: What games that GOG sells are 'rape porn'
avatar
Linko64: https://www.gog.com/en/game/detective_girl_of_the_steam_city

She's literally R'd multiple times, i was kinda surprised the 'high curation' picked it up
Thank you for replying, I don't know many of the anime games in detail.
You are currently a free and original platform, but if you bring DRM-containing content here, no one will prefer you.It would be a shame if you don't put yourself in a position that isn't even considered a Steam alternative.You can't go beyond being a "fake steam" and you will be deleted from the market.
low rated
avatar
MarkoH01: Edit: Yay, downvoted. Makes me wonder if GOG themselves did downvote this time ... would explain why they still refuse to do anything against donvote mobbing here on GOG.
Yep. Pretty much any post that is critical about those news of watering down DRM-Free definition is getting downvoted.
avatar
Uilos: That's not a good placement of the information, the box needs to be at the top of the description, please move it. It's extremely easy to miss it down where it is on the link above. Important information like that needs to be shown properly and not hidden away at the bottom.
Agreed. If the store is serious about drm-free, it needs to be on top and prominent.

There should also be filters. We should have a drm-free search, both for single and multiplayer.

For me, the most positive outcome of this announcement is transparency. Lets be transparent. Its the only possible way we can move forward with this.

It would be nice to also see the Galaxy and offline installers version on the game page prior to purchasing. We should be able to decise not to buy a game is the offline installer is not properly maintained.

avatar
trynoval: Yep. Pretty much any post that is critical about those news of watering down DRM-Free definition is getting downvoted.
Unfortunately, it has been watered down for some time, but now at least, there is some hope that we might be able to make enlightened purchases according to our value without having to do tons of research.
Post edited March 19, 2022 by Magnitus
Well, GOG, I think you've shown yourself to not truly care about DRM-Free with the statement "We'll inform you with a warning on the game page what DRM exists!"

I am extremely disappointed that your commitment to DRM-Free is shrinking like every other broken promise you made (One world, one price for example). You've abandoned all your core principles except DRM-Free, but it is slowly eroding just like the others did before you opened the floodgates to destroy them. GOG is nothing now but a Steam wannabe. Steam, but worse. You say you're going to recommit to DRM-Free, and then shit on it by saying "We'll support DRM-Free with a nebulous intentionally vague definition, then let you know what DRM content is included."

Lying isn't good, and I'm done with it. If you want to be Steam-but-worse, then you be Steam-but-worse. I'll start shopping at Steam again since DRM-Free was the only thing worth keeping me here. Thanks for your dishonesty as it has made the decision simple.
low rated
Thank you to the entire GOG team for all your efforts and victories for DRM-free gaming. I am 100% behind you, and this commitment to DRM-free in this news post is good to hear.

I am dismayed at the current trend in games that are designed to be fragile and brittle, making them dependent on external systems like servers, and thus make them difficult to preserve or go DRM-free. But I am encouraged by the work of GOG, and I see every single game or game feature that is made DRM-free as a small victory - rather than seeing every online feature as a defeat (DRM-free is an ongoing battle).

Keep up the great work, GOG.
I just wanted to emphasise that.
high rated
avatar
SmollestLight: The in-game items received in Cyberpunk 2077 are purely cosmetic and in no way affect the single player experience of the game.
oof. I don't have a dog in the cyberpunk fight but reading this just rubbed me the wrong.

My reasoning is, from my perspective cosmetic items in any game have been and always will be utterly pointless. Iv felt this way even before the day of them being ripped out of games and resold to people. Since cosmetic items hold no value despite what game companies want to try and tell me they are worth. This comes off about as well as it would if you told me I have to use an always online game launcher when ever I go back and play Star wars Jedi knight 2, but only if I was to pick the green light saber.

So I just scratch my head and ask. But why!? just feels like a solution to a problem gog (in this case) created. This is just spitting hairs putting up hurtles for customers for items that ultimately pointless( aka items that "in no way affect the single player experience of the game").
Post edited March 20, 2022 by Death_Masta187