POLE7645: - About the original not being able to be sold separately, I find it to be an incredibly stupid point because that's the case for EVERY single game that has an updated re-release (remakes notwhistanding). And in some cases, we don't even get the originals (like Darksiders II, although it's understandable since the first port was horrible). Broken Sword 1 and 2, System Shock, Monkey Island 1 and 2 (no originals), Day of the Tentacle, Ori and the Blind Forest (no original), Oniken (no original), Strife, Darksiders 1 and 2 and Outcast. All of them have their re-release up front with their original either as a bonus or absent.
Leroux: The difference is that at least in the case of the older games, there were no alternative versions available on the market anymore. So the 'enhanced' re-releases were better than having nothing at all, an improvement over the state of not being able to buy
any version of the game before that, while in the case of IWD and BG, previously available products were intentionally removed from the market
because of the re-release. Although you do have to give them credit for still offering the originals as extras, it still makes the game more expensive even for those who aren't interested in the 'enhanced' version. And it's not like people don't complain about the original versions of Monkey Island not being sold separately here.
Btw, Skyrim and the Bioshocks are other examples for games that are still available in their original version, despite the release of remastered versions.
Divinity Original Sin did it. Even worse was the fact that the Enhanced Edition did not run on every computer that could run the base edition.
ydobemos: No she didn't. That is a gross distortion of what she actually said.
Engerek01: -------------------------------------------
“If there was something for the original
Baldur’s Gate that just doesn’t mesh for modern day gamers like the sexism, [we tried to address that],” said writer Amber Scott. “In the original there’s a lot of jokes at women’s expense. Or if not a lot, there’s a couple, like Safana was just a sex object in BG 1, and Jaheira was the nagging wife and that was played for comedy.
We were able to say like, ‘No, that’s not really the kind of story we want to make.’ In Siege of Dragonspear, Safana gets her own little storyline,
she got a way better personality upgrade. If people don’t like that, then too bad.” --------------------------------
As You can see, she claimed BG was sexist and needed to be changed an that is what the DID. Please tell me where is the distortion in my sentence?
It gives me shivers if she tried to "fix" fall-from-grace. No thank you.
some links..
redditt beamdog Can you name an example in the game? I don't care what she said, only what she wrote. I think at least she is to be admired for her transparency in that interview, as she acknowledges the fact she will write the expansion differently to the base game due to her inherent biases, as compared to the original writers, a trait that afflicts us all.