I don't even know what to make of Bootpunter's last few pieces of verbal constipation.

And that's why you started calling names. Yeah, you are very tolerant person (not).

Already? We haven't even talked about global warming yet... OR RELIGION! That's a fun one!

Wasn't all our talk about religion? I mean, all we talked about were things each of us believe in. Some believe in rational thought, some in liberal values, some in white male privilege and so on.

At least you have the option to make a white character. There are no asians in the Elder Scrolls series but I don't see anyone boycotting it. You can wield katanas and tantos but can't make an asian character.

I don't think Bethesda is racist because of it though. There is some in-game justification for it and the asians (Akaviri) are apparently extinct - or became vampire lizards or something.

Oh for the love of... stop trying to tell people what they should and should not say. The people you're trying to champion for don't care, they're not all fragile snowflakes.

Actually, they are. I mean she really champions not for autists, but for "snowflakes", because it's snowflake reaction (crying "Nooo!" and thowing a tantrum) to things not going their way is what some people call (though quite inaccurately) "autistic screecing".

The insistence on thought and word policing, the attack on free speech is more offensive than anything someone could say about people with autism.

I won't argue with that. I'm just saying that it simply inaccurate to call snoflakes who throw a tantrum autists, because frankly people with autism and aspergers are least likely to be among "social justice" and political correctness supporters.

Weren't we waiting for that. I mean, all the other right-wing imagined reality phrasal vomit is already here. "Political correctness", the "identity politics", the "special snowflake", the "attack helicopter", the "attack on free speech", the "word policing" and of course, the most stupid of it all, the "thought policing".

It was inevitable that it would all lead here, because for pages now a few assholes have been doing nothing besides dehumanizing certain minority groups.

Congratulations, this is exactly the atmosphere in which LootHunter thrives. An utter warning sign that your forum is going to shit.

And it started with you, all those pages ago. Which is really sad particularly as you have self-diagnosed rather effectively.

You've been trying, for many pages now, to push a false dichotomy on people, contrary to science. You know well that it constituted trolling, and you have exhibited a certain malicious glee in reiterating the false dichotomy several times. You have, contary to the spirit of enlightenment and to reason, failed to listen and understand, although many laudable attempts at an explanation have been made. You have been actively creating division and a distorted reality.

Ask yourself why you did that, you've given the answer already. You need that false dichotomy like air to breathe. You're horrified by the idea that gender isn't binary. You're horrified by the idea that non-binary people actually have a fully formed and healthy self, an identity. You're horrified they're considered people.

In a narrative game, you're unable to relate to characters when their biological sex is not explicitly stated, even though you get to choose a pronoun and could continue to revel in something that is your fantasy anyway: that this means an explicitly stated biological sex.

All the neo-right-wing drivel that you're excreting will not hide that your problem is a lack of literal empathy.

Thank you. Thank you so much. And quoted for truth.

I'd love to read those paragraphs one day.

Science will confirm that there are two genders, male and female. Take a random sample of the population and see what their physical characteristics are. I'm confident you'll not find some magical third gender there; it will be males and females, and a rare person that mixes the two genders in different ways. For reference, an example of a third gender might be if we had a gender(let's call it a Fedrale just to make it easier) that implants an egg into a female, then the male fertilizes that egg. Then we would have male, female, and fedrale genders. But we don't have that, we have two. Female carries the eggs, male fertilizes. Pretty simple, really.

Talking about what's real is not considered trolling in any sense I'm aware of; I might as well be talking about the existence of gravity. Would you also consider that to be 'trolling'? I suppose it might be considered trolling if you're unwilling to accept that reality isn't subjective; then I would be pushing my 'gravity' agenda on you. Having a discussion about something isn't creating division and distorted reality. I'm talking about something like pushing sexism where there is none; like the example of the woman trying to say that air conditioning is sexist. Or refusing to have a discussion about a topic and instead try to censor your opponent; that will create division.

The irony is that I lean more to the left. I support socialism(as it's implemented in Canada), free health care, multiculturalism, I'm happy to pay taxes and have the government provide programs like welfare to people who need it, I support 'normal' immigration(ie. immigration done carefully and with care to integrate immigrants into canadian culture). However the insane push to restrict free speech, tear down reason and individual liberty, to be so intolerant to differing opinions that the opposition is shouted down or threatened with violence for speaking, the resistance to acknowledge objective reality, intentional distortion of what's true(technically the insane postmodernists think truth is a useless concept), forced diversity, the inability to compromise(ie. all relationships are based on power and power alone), the push to destroy western culture that has improved our lives immeasurably and allowed us to advance so quickly; those are all issues that transcend political position, this is the first true threat to civilized society I've ever seen during my lifetime.

Frankly everyone should be standing up in opposition to postmodern sjw radical leftists, regardless of political leaning. I think the only reason they don't is because they don't fully understand what you're trying to do yet. People are waking up though, I only found out earlier this year when I saw protestors/ unethical thugs using borderline violence to try and prevent people from having rational discussions about things they disagreed with at universities; labelling it 'hate speech' when it was anything but.

I'm going to vote for whoever is most likely to stop this nonsense from continuing, even if that means voting for someone I wouldn't normally. Good job.

The rare person who mixes those two genders is, in fact, of a third (or fourth, or fifth, or n-th (for n > 2) gender. Hence, the rare example that you mention here disproves your point.

It really is not as simple as you're claiming; biology is a very complex subject, and plenty of things can go in ways you wouldn't expect.

(Also, what about people who are infertile, being unable to either carry an egg or fertilize one?)

You don't need to give each subcategory its own classification. How would you even define what being 9/10 male is? That doesn't create an entirely different gender. Being infertile doesn't matter, you still have the same equipment that's used in the same way.

You literally just googled 'science gender' and posted the articles on the first page that seemed to support what you wanted. I don't think you even read them, most of them are opinion pieces, not scientific studies, and the one reputable one doesn't say anything about how many genders there are, it just talks about how you can have a female brain in a male body, and explains what transgenderism is. It doesn't say anything about multiple genders.

How about you try to address the statement I posted instead of posting random things you found on the internet that aren't even relevant to the argument.

It's because of tactics like these, labelling people fascist(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2y8Sx4B2Sk) that you will see reasonable people act in opposition to you.

You trying to slip in authoritarianism by disguising it as philantropy is not going to work.