Posted September 23, 2016
This thread is so obviously funded by George Soros.
Garrison72
New User
Registered: Apr 2010
From United States
Kleetus
For Internal Use Only
Registered: Sep 2010
From Australia
rtcvb32
echo e.lolfiu_fefiipieue|tr valueof_pi [0-9]
Registered: Aug 2013
From United States
Posted September 23, 2016
low rated
You know, when there's a video of CNN that show Hillary 'wobbly' and cut the video before she falls, and then Alex Jones shows THE WHOLE VIDEO, i am forced to believe Alex Jones over CNN and the media (with a 6% trust rate), especially when all the main media have the same exact message/points/cut of the video. Alex Jones shows the 'cut' news where they remove/edit portions, and then the live/full versions for comparison.
Post edited September 23, 2016 by rtcvb32
Kleetus
For Internal Use Only
Registered: Sep 2010
From Australia
DaCostaBR
Dayman: Fighter of the Nightman
Registered: Sep 2012
From Brazil
Posted September 23, 2016
And what about all the evil vaccines that cause autism despite the countless and countless studies saying the opposite? What about NASA's lies about going to the moon, even though they placed instrumentation there that you can check from the Earth? Hell, what about "Jet fuel can't melt steel beams"?
Breja described an accident and a conspiracy theory saying it was an assassination and you immediately sided with the assassination story despite knowing nothing about it. His avatar is very appropriate here, because you want to believe.
You can't can't act like you have the impartial eye for truth, not after Kleetus has trolled you for over a week to keep you spamming the forum by bumping that thread and you still haven't noticed it. He even practically came out and said that's what he was doing once.
Kleetus
For Internal Use Only
Registered: Sep 2010
From Australia
rtcvb32
echo e.lolfiu_fefiipieue|tr valueof_pi [0-9]
Registered: Aug 2013
From United States
Posted September 23, 2016
low rated
Impartial studies tend to be far more useful and accurate.
You know a while back I watched some videos I think it was GreenEarth on Youtube, where they had this HUGE something like 5x3 Fresnel lens which could focus energy something like 3000° in a single spot. He showed he could melt metal easily and quickly. However the moment he went to the huge 1-2 inch slab he was using as a back board, (3x3?) and it never EVER hinted at melting even though it was the same metal. The heat was dissipating and spreading through the rest of the metal too fast to heat up enough. That was a fairly small sheet of metal, compare that to 250,000 tons of industrial steel for the twin towers, not to mention those fires were smoking (choking) and out within 20 minutes.
Besides talking of steel beams melting, if the tower was to fall due to those issues and the heat, the towers would have fallen sideways... not straight down at a freefall. A freefall only happens when there's no resistance at all.
edit:I'm sure this is the video I watched a while back.
Kleetus neither trolled, coaxed, messaged or anything to me to start the thread. At worst he got me to put an additional link up. I planned on doing the thread daily on my own anyways. After listening for a week I was convinced it's important enough to stop playing as many games, and concentrate on the immediate future. It certainly helps that the main media is being so biased and crappy with their jobs that it's blatantly obvious where they stand.
Post edited September 23, 2016 by rtcvb32
zeogold
The Puzzlemaster
Registered: Dec 2012
From United States
Posted September 23, 2016
You have to ask that about the studies or sources you reference as well. If you're not questioning your own side, you're making the same mistake you're accusing everybody else of doing.
I'm an avid documentary watcher and reader of random information, and I know of the whole sugar industry fiasco. There have been studies showing that sugar is MISERABLE for you funded by sugar substitute companies.
There is no such thing as an impartial study. Every researcher has a bias, and if he doesn't, the person funding him almost always does (nobody just spends money without a reason). The question is whether that bias alters the investigation or not, and if so, how.
I've seen some videos too. Like this one. What makes the videos you've seen more credible or more plausible than mine?
I believe DaCosta was interpreting your saying history was white-washed as you siding with the conspiracy theorists he mentioned in his statement, which I doubt is what you meant, but, given your current string of siding with conspiracy theorists, he thought it most likely.
I'm an avid documentary watcher and reader of random information, and I know of the whole sugar industry fiasco. There have been studies showing that sugar is MISERABLE for you funded by sugar substitute companies.
There is no such thing as an impartial study. Every researcher has a bias, and if he doesn't, the person funding him almost always does (nobody just spends money without a reason). The question is whether that bias alters the investigation or not, and if so, how.
I've seen some videos too. Like this one. What makes the videos you've seen more credible or more plausible than mine?
I believe DaCosta was interpreting your saying history was white-washed as you siding with the conspiracy theorists he mentioned in his statement, which I doubt is what you meant, but, given your current string of siding with conspiracy theorists, he thought it most likely.
Post edited September 23, 2016 by zeogold
Kleetus
For Internal Use Only
Registered: Sep 2010
From Australia
zeogold
The Puzzlemaster
Registered: Dec 2012
From United States
Posted September 23, 2016
He hasn't done anything that would cause you to continue posting, but it IS clear that he's mocking you, as his behavior is very consistent with other ways in which he's mocked people. Your responses to this mockery tend to give the impression that you're taking his statements seriously.
rtcvb32: After listening for a week I was convinced it's important enough to stop playing as many games, and concentrate on the immediate future. As good as your intentions may be, it's rather obvious that your cries are falling on deaf ears. You might want to give it up and seek another forum, website, blog, etc. where people would be more receptive.
I hate to sound rude, but at the rate you're going currently, you're only making a fool of yourself and causing people to view you unfavorably. Take a lesson from how dtgreene is treated. Nobody likes to hear the same thing over and over again.
I hate to sound rude, but at the rate you're going currently, you're only making a fool of yourself and causing people to view you unfavorably. Take a lesson from how dtgreene is treated. Nobody likes to hear the same thing over and over again.
Post edited September 23, 2016 by zeogold
rtcvb32
echo e.lolfiu_fefiipieue|tr valueof_pi [0-9]
Registered: Aug 2013
From United States
Posted September 23, 2016
low rated
Let's not forget architects and expert engineers before 9/11 had NEVER EVER seen a building or tower go down due to a fire.
It's also said that they couldn't dig up the remainder of the twin towers because they were coming across molten metal, and this was for 6 months AFTER the tower fell.
If someone is poisoning your water supply, say with heavy metals, lead or something, people will get stirred. But if that isn't kept up, then people will forget and move on. This also happens in the gaming industry, which is why Jim Sterling keeps bringing up Microtransactions when they appear in full games that shouldn't have them.
We need reminders of injustices, even if we don't want to hear it. My rep is unimportant compared to how important I think this is. If I thought or think they are taking me for a spin, I wouldn't have started. Ignore me if they want, but important things are happening. As I said in the thread title, 'it's time to pay attention'.
Post edited September 23, 2016 by rtcvb32
zeogold
The Puzzlemaster
Registered: Dec 2012
From United States
Posted September 23, 2016
I could come across an article saying that butter can kill you, and in it is cited a scientific study about the long-term effects of butter. The study shows it can cause heart disease, high blood pressure, osteoarthritis, sleep apnea, and various cardiovascular diseases
But if I actually looked at that study more, I'd realize that the study was funded by a big margarine company and that it was conducted by feeding participants a stick of butter per day, which would most certainly make you fat enough to kill you. In fact, if you're paying close enough attention, you'd realize that all of those effects are actually a result of the participants becoming overweight, it has nothing to do with the butter itself.
i'm not saying that whatever you're looking at is necessarily lying to you or poorly-researched, I'm just saying you should make sure what it is before you just accept it as fact. Unfortunately, this rarely ever happens, which is why we've had so many successful scientific and medical hoaxes through the years.
Whoa, whoa, whoa. Slow down there, bud. There's no way in heck I'm about to dispute the 9/11 incident and derail the thread. My point was that there are many sources for both sides. Have you properly checked and looked into arguments against the points which you make, or do you only read one side of the coin?
Post edited September 23, 2016 by zeogold
Kleetus
For Internal Use Only
Registered: Sep 2010
From Australia
rtcvb32
echo e.lolfiu_fefiipieue|tr valueof_pi [0-9]
Registered: Aug 2013
From United States
Posted September 23, 2016
low rated
Had the investigation went through it's likely we'd find that the result we saw was impossible according to the official statement. But everyone wants to live in denial rather than look at what is as comprehensively the truth as can be done using scientific analysis.
Vainamoinen
🇺🇦 🇺🇦 🇺🇦 🇺🇦
Registered: May 2010
From Germany
Posted September 23, 2016
Your friend is layering it on incredibly thick though. The government, the rich people, the press, the feminists and all the truth in Christian prophecies. That's... such a huge load of manure to wade through, I am so sorry.
I'm still amazed at how the 9/11 "inside job" conspiracy faith has survived recent surges of islamist terrorism and anti-islam sentiments. There it was, by a huuuge margin the largest islamist terror attack on American soil, and still the paranoid would rather blame the government. I'm even still hearing the "these unprepared Arabs couldn't have done it" fallacy when it has clearly been shown these last years what infinitely terrible things a single dedicated person can achieve.
Eventually, you may have to tell your friend that it's not just that you don't share his specific reality piercing needle pins or his individually chosen artifacts of doubt, but his whole method of acquiring evidence and his whole quasi-religious conspiracy faith, and that you don't wish to talk about the topic with him at all. For him, that's you closing your eyes to the truth and all the readily available evidence out there, of course, but at one point self preservation should set in. That's way more crazy than I could bear.
Oh WOW. I had no idea. I'm so sorry. :(
